Reliability, Structure, and Validity of Module I (Personality Functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I)

被引:12
|
作者
Ohse, Ludwig [1 ]
Zimmermann, Johannes [2 ]
Kerber, Andre [3 ]
Kampe, Leonie [1 ,4 ]
Mohr, Jil [1 ]
Kendlbacher, Julia [1 ]
Busch, Oliver [1 ]
Rentrop, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Horz-Sagstetter, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Psycholog Hsch Berlin, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Kolln Pk 2, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Kassel, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Div Clin Psychol Intervent, Berlin, Germany
[4] Klinikum Itzehoe, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat Med, Itzehoe, Germany
[5] KBO Inn Salzach Klinikum, Wasserburg am Inn, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
关键词
personality disorders; personality functioning; Level of Personality Functioning Scale; AMPD; DSM-5; SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEW; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PART I; LEVEL; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1037/per0000576
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample (n = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: Integrating Multiple Paradigms of Personality Assessment.
    Regier, Darrel A.
    PSYCHIATRY-INTERPERSONAL AND BIOLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2019, 82 (04): : 375 - 378
  • [42] Exploring the Associations of Personality and Sexual Health Using the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders
    Deschenes, Melissa
    Gamache, Dominick
    Vaillancourt-Morel, Marie-Pier
    Mayrand, Kristel
    Nolin, Marie-Chloe
    Berthelot, Nicolas
    Mercerat, Coralie
    Savard, Claudia
    JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2024, 50 (07) : 834 - 854
  • [43] Alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5 [Das alternative Modell für Persönlichkeitsstörungen in DSM-5]
    Berberich G.
    Zaudig M.
    Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie, 2015, 9 (3) : 155 - 163
  • [44] Special Series on the Personality Functioning Component of the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (vol 100, pg 565, 2018)
    Bender, Donna S.
    Zimmermann, Johannes
    Huprich, Steven K.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2019, 101 (03) : 343 - 343
  • [45] Investigating the overlap and predictive validity between Criterion A and B in the alternative model for personality disorders in DSM-5
    Marti Valls, Carla
    Balazadeh, Kitty
    Kajonius, Petri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF TESTING, 2023, 23 (03) : 190 - 204
  • [46] Narcissism and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorder
    Miller, Joshua D.
    Crowe, Michael L.
    Sharpe, Brinkley M.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 13 (04) : 407 - 411
  • [47] Developing a New Model of Personality Disorders for DSM-5
    Skodol, Andrew E.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2011, 25 : 3 - 4
  • [48] Clinical Utility of the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders: Six Cases from Practice
    Bach, Bo
    Markon, Kristian
    Simonsen, Erik
    Krueger, Robert F.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRIC PRACTICE, 2015, 21 (01) : 3 - 25
  • [49] The Impact of DSM-5's Alternative Model for Personality Disorders on Criminal Defendants
    Filone, Sarah
    Strohmaier, Heidi
    Murphy, Megan
    DeMatteo, David
    BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES & THE LAW, 2014, 32 (01) : 135 - 148
  • [50] Psychological Assessment With the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders: Tradition and Innovation
    Waugh, Mark H.
    Krueger, Robert F.
    Pincus, Aaron L.
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    Morey, Leslie C.
    Wright, Aidan G. C.
    PROFESSIONAL PSYCHOLOGY-RESEARCH AND PRACTICE, 2017, 48 (02) : 79 - 89