Reliability, Structure, and Validity of Module I (Personality Functioning) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders (SCID-5-AMPD-I)

被引:11
|
作者
Ohse, Ludwig [1 ]
Zimmermann, Johannes [2 ]
Kerber, Andre [3 ]
Kampe, Leonie [1 ,4 ]
Mohr, Jil [1 ]
Kendlbacher, Julia [1 ]
Busch, Oliver [1 ]
Rentrop, Michael [5 ,6 ]
Horz-Sagstetter, Susanne [1 ]
机构
[1] Psycholog Hsch Berlin, Dept Clin Psychol & Psychotherapy, Kolln Pk 2, D-10179 Berlin, Germany
[2] Univ Kassel, Dept Psychol, Kassel, Germany
[3] Free Univ Berlin, Div Clin Psychol Intervent, Berlin, Germany
[4] Klinikum Itzehoe, Dept Psychiat Psychotherapy & Psychosomat Med, Itzehoe, Germany
[5] KBO Inn Salzach Klinikum, Wasserburg am Inn, Germany
[6] Tech Univ Munich, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Munich, Germany
关键词
personality disorders; personality functioning; Level of Personality Functioning Scale; AMPD; DSM-5; SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEW; PSYCHOMETRIC EVALUATION; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; PART I; LEVEL; CRITERION;
D O I
10.1037/per0000576
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
According to the alternative model for personality disorders (AMPD) of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5), a moderate or greater impairment in personality functioning is the essential criterion for a personality disorder diagnosis. Personality functioning is operationalized in the Level of Personality Functioning Scale via 4 domains (identity, self-direction, empathy, and intimacy) and 2 higher order dimensions (self and interpersonal functioning). The current study examined the reliability (interrater, test-retest), structure, and validity (convergent, discriminant, and incremental) of the Structured Clinical Interview for the AMPD-Module I (SCID-5-AMPD-I). A clinical sample (n = 121) completed the SCID-5-AMPD-I, along with an interview for DSM-5 Section II personality disorders and self-reports for personality pathology (personality functioning, personality organization, personality structure, and pathological personality traits) and other forms of psychopathology (depression, anxiety, somatization, and general disability). Interrater and test-retest reliability was excellent for overall personality functioning, the higher order dimensions, and the domains, except for the empathy domain in the test-retest condition. Factor analyses suggest that personality functioning is an essentially unidimensional construct. Personality functioning demonstrated high convergence with other forms of personality pathology and showed good discriminant validity in relation to depression, anxiety, and somatization but not in relation to the broader construct of general disability. Personality functioning (Criterion A) showed incremental validity over pathological personality traits (Criterion B) in predicting interview-assessed DSM-5 Section II personality disorders but not in predicting self-reported personality and general psychopathology. The present study suggests that the SCID-5-AMPD-I is a viable measure for personality functioning.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 299
页数:13
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] An Examination of Dependent Personality Disorder in the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
    McClintock, Andrew S.
    McCarrick, Shannon M.
    JOURNAL OF PSYCHOPATHOLOGY AND BEHAVIORAL ASSESSMENT, 2017, 39 (04) : 635 - 641
  • [22] An Examination of Dependent Personality Disorder in the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders
    Andrew S. McClintock
    Shannon M. McCarrick
    Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 2017, 39 : 635 - 641
  • [23] Validation of the DSM-5 Alternative Model Personality Disorder Diagnoses in Turkey, Part 1: LEAD Validity and Reliability of the Personality Functioning Ratings
    Dereboy, Ferhan
    Dereboy, Cigdem
    Eskin, Mehmet
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2018, 100 (06) : 603 - 611
  • [24] Personality Disorders in DSM-5: Emerging Research on the Alternative Model
    Morey, Leslie C.
    Benson, Kathryn T.
    Busch, Alexander J.
    Skodol, Andrew E.
    CURRENT PSYCHIATRY REPORTS, 2015, 17 (04)
  • [25] AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON THE DSM-5 ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR PERSONALITY DISORDERS
    Yalch, Matthew M.
    Stone, Sydney N.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2024, 38 (03) : 268 - 283
  • [26] Personality Disorders in DSM-5: Emerging Research on the Alternative Model
    Leslie C. Morey
    Kathryn T. Benson
    Alexander J. Busch
    Andrew E. Skodol
    Current Psychiatry Reports, 2015, 17
  • [27] Changes in the Classification of Personality Disorders: Comparing the DSM-5 Section II Personality Disorder Model to the Alternative Model for Personality Disorders Using Structured Clinical Interviews
    Weekers, Laura C.
    Hutsebaut, Joost
    Zimmermann, Johannes
    Kamphuis, Jan H.
    PERSONALITY DISORDERS-THEORY RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2022, 13 (05) : 527 - 535
  • [28] Reliability and validity of severity dimensions of psychopathology assessed using the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-5 (SCID)
    Shankman, Stewart A.
    Funkhouser, Carter J.
    Klein, Daniel N.
    Davila, Joanne
    Lerner, Debra
    Hee, Danelle
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF METHODS IN PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH, 2018, 27 (01)
  • [29] Exploring the Assessment of the DSM-5 Alternative Model for Personality Disorders With the Personality Assessment Inventory
    Busch, Alexander J.
    Morey, Leslie C.
    Hopwood, Christopher J.
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2017, 99 (02) : 211 - 218
  • [30] EXAMINING THE STRUCTURE AND VALIDITY OF SELF-REPORT MEASURES OF DSM-5 ALTERNATIVE MODEL FOR PERSONALITY DISORDERS CRITERION A
    Bliton, Chloe F.
    Roche, Michael J.
    Pincus, Aaron L.
    Dueber, David
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY DISORDERS, 2022, 36 (02) : 157 - +