Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO2 Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge

被引:27
|
作者
Subraveti, Sai Gokul [1 ]
Angel, Elda Rodriguez [2 ]
Ramirez, Andrea [2 ]
Roussanaly, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Energy Res, N-7019 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 Delft, Netherlands
关键词
carbon capture and storage; CO2; reduction; cost-benefit analysis; cost analysis; emissions;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.2c05724
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO2 emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user's one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO2 emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (similar to 1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO2 emissions (similar to 51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS.
引用
收藏
页码:2595 / 2601
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Industry CO2 EOR experience relevant for carbon capture and storage (CCS)
    Sweatman, R. E.
    Parker, M. E.
    Crookshank, S. L.
    OIL & GAS JOURNAL, 2009, 107 (45) : 20 - 25
  • [2] Impact Analysis About Introducing CCS for CO2 Emissions Reduction
    Zhou, Yicheng
    She Jinhua
    Li, Yong
    Nakanishi, Yosuke
    2021 IEEE PES INNOVATIVE SMART GRID TECHNOLOGIES - ASIA (ISGT ASIA), 2021,
  • [3] Influence of SO2 on CO2 storage for CCS technology: Evaluation of CO2/SO2 co-capture
    Gimeno, Beatriz
    Artal, Manuela
    Velasco, Inmaculada
    Blanco, Sofia T.
    Fernandez, Javier
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 206 : 172 - 180
  • [4] Tackling CO2 reduction in India through use of CO2 capture and storage (CCS):: Prospects and challenges
    Shackley, Simon
    Verma, Preeti
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (09) : 3554 - 3561
  • [5] Metrics for sustainability analysis of post-combustion abatement of CO2 emissions: Microalgae mediated routes and CCS (carbon capture and storage)
    Fernandes Araujo, Ofelia de Queiroz
    de Medeiros, Jose Luiz
    Yokoyama, Lidia
    Vaz Morgado, Claudia do Rosario
    ENERGY, 2015, 92 : 556 - 568
  • [6] CO2 capture and storage (CCS) cost reduction via infrastructure right-sizing
    Mechleri, Eugenia
    Brown, Solomon
    Fennell, Paul S.
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    CHEMICAL ENGINEERING RESEARCH & DESIGN, 2017, 119 : 130 - 139
  • [7] A Compendium of CO2 Leakage Detection and Monitoring Techniques in Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Pipelines
    Adefila, Kehinde
    Yan, Yong
    2013 IEEE EUROCON, 2013, : 1327 - 1333
  • [8] Coal and energy security for India: Role of carbon dioxide (CO2) capture and storage (CCS)
    Garg, Amit
    Shukla, P. R.
    ENERGY, 2009, 34 (08) : 1032 - 1041
  • [9] A novel methodological approach for achieving £/MWh cost reduction of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) processes
    Cabral, Renato P.
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 205 : 529 - 539
  • [10] Comparison of CO2 liquefaction pressures for ship-based carbon capture and storage (CCS) chain
    Seo, Youngkyun
    Huh, Cheol
    Lee, Sangick
    Chang, Daejun
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2016, 52 : 1 - 12