Is Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Really So Expensive? An Analysis of Cascading Costs and CO2 Emissions Reduction of Industrial CCS Implementation on the Construction of a Bridge

被引:27
|
作者
Subraveti, Sai Gokul [1 ]
Angel, Elda Rodriguez [2 ]
Ramirez, Andrea [2 ]
Roussanaly, Simon [1 ]
机构
[1] SINTEF Energy Res, N-7019 Trondheim, Norway
[2] Delft Univ Technol, NL-2628 Delft, Netherlands
关键词
carbon capture and storage; CO2; reduction; cost-benefit analysis; cost analysis; emissions;
D O I
10.1021/acs.est.2c05724
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) is an essential technology to mitigate global CO2 emissions from power and industry sectors. Despite the increasing recognition of its importance to achieve the net-zero target, current CCS deployment is far behind targeted ambitions. A key reason is that CCS is often perceived as too expensive. The costs of CCS have however traditionally been looked at from the industrial plant perspective, which does not necessarily reflect the end user's one. This paper addresses the incomplete view by investigating the impact of implementing CCS in industrial facilities on the overall costs and CO2 emissions of end-user products and services. As an example, we examine the extent to which an increase in costs of raw materials (cement and steel) due to CCS impacts the costs of building a bridge. Results show that although CCS significantly increases cement and steel costs, the subsequent increment in the overall bridge construction cost remains marginal (similar to 1%). This 1% cost increase, however, enables a deep reduction in CO2 emissions (similar to 51%) associated with the bridge construction. Although more research is needed in this area, this work is the first step to a better understanding of the real cost and benefits of CCS.
引用
收藏
页码:2595 / 2601
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [21] The acceptability of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) in Europe: An assessment of the key determining factors Part 2. The social acceptability of CCS and the wider impacts and repercussions of its implementation
    Shackley, Simon
    Reiner, David
    Upham, Paul
    de Coninck, Heleen
    Sigurthorsson, Gudmundur
    Anderson, Jason
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (03) : 344 - 356
  • [22] Internal corrosion of carbon steel pipelines for dense-phase CO2 transport in carbon capture and storage (CCS) - a review
    Barker, R.
    Hua, Y.
    Neville, A.
    INTERNATIONAL MATERIALS REVIEWS, 2017, 62 (01) : 1 - 31
  • [23] CO2 stability of Portland cement based well cementing systems for use on carbon capture & storage (CCS) wells
    Lesti, M.
    Tiemeyer, C.
    Plank, J.
    CEMENT AND CONCRETE RESEARCH, 2013, 45 : 45 - 54
  • [24] Could the energy cost of using supercritical fluids be mitigated by using CO2 from carbon capture and storage (CCS)?
    Stevens, James G.
    Gomez, Pilar
    Bourne, Richard A.
    Drage, Trevor C.
    George, Michael W.
    Poliakoff, Martyn
    GREEN CHEMISTRY, 2011, 13 (10) : 2727 - 2733
  • [25] Was the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake in Japan Related to Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS)-CO2 Injection? Insights From Geomechanical Analysis
    Lei, Xinglin
    FRONTIERS IN EARTH SCIENCE, 2022, 10
  • [26] Potential impact of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage (CCS) systems on growth and yield in spring field bean
    Al-Traboulsi, Manal
    Sjoegersten, Sofie
    Colls, Jeremy
    Steven, Michael
    Craigon, Jim
    Black, Colin
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 80 : 43 - 53
  • [27] The property of hydrogen separation from CO2 mixture using Pd-based membranes for carbon capture and storage (CCS)
    Ryi, Shin-Kun
    Park, Jong-Soo
    Hwang, Kyung-Ran
    Lee, Chun-Boo
    Lee, Sung-Wook
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HYDROGEN ENERGY, 2013, 38 (18) : 7605 - 7611
  • [28] Review on carbon capture and storage (CCS) from source to sink; part 1: Essential aspects for CO2 pipeline transportation
    Kim, Tea Woo
    Yoon, Hyun Chul
    Lee, Joo Yong
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2024, 137
  • [29] Socio-economic impacts of future electricity generation scenarios in Europe: Potential costs and benefits of using CO2 Capture and Storage (CCS)
    Koelbl, Barbara Sophia
    Wood, Richard
    van den Broek, Machteld A.
    Sanders, Mark W. J. L.
    Faaij, Andre P. C.
    van Vuuren, Detlef P.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 42 : 471 - 484
  • [30] A comparison of electricity and hydrogen production systems with CO2 capture and storage -: Part B:: Chain analysis of promising CCS options
    Damen, Kay
    van Troost, Martijn
    Faaij, Andre
    Turkenburg, Wim
    PROGRESS IN ENERGY AND COMBUSTION SCIENCE, 2007, 33 (06) : 580 - 609