CO2 capture and storage (CCS) cost reduction via infrastructure right-sizing

被引:34
|
作者
Mechleri, Eugenia [1 ,2 ]
Brown, Solomon [3 ]
Fennell, Paul S. [4 ]
Mac Dowell, Niall [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Proc Syst Engn, London SW7 2AZ, England
[2] Imperial Coll London, Ctr Environm Policy, London SW7 1NA, England
[3] Univ Sheffield, Dept Chem & Biol Engn, Mappin St, Sheffield S1 3JD, S Yorkshire, England
[4] Imperial Coll London, Dept Chem Engn, London, England
来源
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
CO2 pipeline transport; Optimisation; CCS; Cost minimisation; PIPELINE TRANSPORT; STREAM IMPURITIES; CARBON CAPTURE; OPTIMIZATION; DESIGN; MODELS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.cherd.2017.01.016
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Carbon capture and storage (CCS) will be a critical component of a portfolio of low-carbon energy technologies required to combat climate change (IEA-GHG, 2013). As such, an extensive transportation infrastructure will be required to transport captured CO2 from different sources to the available sinks. Several studies in the literature suggest that shared oversized pipeline networks may be the most efficient long term option compared to single source to sink pipelines, based on increased CCS deployment over the years and therefore increased CO2 flowrate to the transport network. However, what is neglected in this vision is that the deployment of intermittent renewable energy tends to displace thermal power generation. This directly reduces the amount of fossil fuel burned, CO2 produced, captured and transported through the network. This paper presents an optimisation methodology to "right-size" CO2 transport infrastructure, explicitly accounting for the transient flow of CO2 arising from the co-deployment of intermittent renewable energy generators. By application of this methodology, we demonstrate that capital cost reductions of up to 28% are possible relative to a business-as-usual design case. (C) 2017 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:130 / 139
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] A novel methodological approach for achieving £/MWh cost reduction of CO2 capture and storage (CCS) processes
    Cabral, Renato P.
    Mac Dowell, Niall
    APPLIED ENERGY, 2017, 205 : 529 - 539
  • [2] Tackling CO2 reduction in India through use of CO2 capture and storage (CCS):: Prospects and challenges
    Shackley, Simon
    Verma, Preeti
    ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (09) : 3554 - 3561
  • [3] The cost of CO2 capture and storage
    Rubin, Edward S.
    Davison, John E.
    Herzog, Howard J.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2015, 40 : 378 - 400
  • [4] Reduction potential of the energy penalty for CO2 capture in CCS
    Yawen Zheng
    Lin Gao
    Song He
    Hongguang Jin
    Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17 : 390 - 399
  • [5] Reduction potential of the energy penalty for CO2 capture in CCS
    Zheng, Yawen
    Gao, Lin
    He, Song
    Jin, Hongguang
    FRONTIERS IN ENERGY, 2023, 17 (03) : 390 - 399
  • [6] Efficient Design of CO2 Capture and Storage Infrastructure
    Whitman, Caleb
    Yaw, Sean
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Hoover, Brendan
    Ellett, Kevin
    E-ENERGY'19: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 10TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY SYSTEMS, 2019, : 383 - 384
  • [7] Linear models for optimization of infrastructure for CO2 capture and storage
    Bakken, Bjorn H.
    Velken, Ingrid von Streng
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENERGY CONVERSION, 2008, 23 (03) : 824 - 833
  • [8] Scalable algorithms for designing CO2 capture and storage infrastructure
    Caleb Whitman
    Sean Yaw
    Brendan Hoover
    Richard Middleton
    Optimization and Engineering, 2022, 23 : 1057 - 1083
  • [9] Scalable algorithms for designing CO2 capture and storage infrastructure
    Whitman, Caleb
    Yaw, Sean
    Hoover, Brendan
    Middleton, Richard
    OPTIMIZATION AND ENGINEERING, 2022, 23 (02) : 1057 - 1083
  • [10] The cost of getting CCS wrong: Uncertainty, infrastructure design, and stranded CO2
    Middleton, Richard S.
    Yaw, Sean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2018, 70 : 1 - 11