Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Ruoran [1 ]
Cai, Linrui [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
He, Min [4 ]
Xu, Jianguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Inst Drug Clin Trial GCP, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dis Women & Children, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
traumatic brain injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; machine learning; prognosis factors; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; COAGULOPATHY; COAGULATION; MORTALITY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59010171
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly develops in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and is a risk factor for poor prognosis. We designed this study to evaluate the performance of several machine learning algorithms for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. Methods: TBI patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were eligible for this study. ARDS was identified according to the Berlin definition. Included TBI patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation cohort with a ratio of 7:3. Several machine learning algorithms were utilized to develop predictive models with five-fold cross validation for ARDS including extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, Random Forest, adaptive boosting, complement naive Bayes, and support vector machine. The performance of machine learning algorithms were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F score. Results: 649 TBI patients from the MIMIC-III database were included with an ARDS incidence of 49.5%. The random forest performed the best in predicting ARDS in the training cohort with an AUC of 1.000. The XGBoost and AdaBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.989 and 0.815 in the training cohort. The random forest still performed the best in predicting ARDS in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.652. AdaBoost and XGBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.631 and 0.620 in the validation cohort. Several mutual top features in the random forest and AdaBoost were discovered including age, initial systolic blood pressure and heart rate, Abbreviated Injury Score chest, white blood cells, platelets, and international normalized ratio. Conclusions: The random forest and AdaBoost based models have stable and good performance for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. These models could help clinicians to evaluate the risk of ARDS in early stages after TBI and consequently adjust treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating traumatic brain injury. Can opposite strategies converge?
    Robba, Chiara
    Camporota, Luigi
    Citerio, Giuseppe
    INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 2023, 49 (05) : 583 - 586
  • [32] High-frequency oscillatory ventilation in adults with traumatic brain injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome
    David, M
    Karmrodt, J
    Weiler, N
    Scholz, A
    Markstaller, K
    Eberle, B
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2005, 49 (02) : 209 - 214
  • [33] Acute respiratory distress syndrome complicating traumatic brain injury. Can opposite strategies converge?
    Chiara Robba
    Luigi Camporota
    Giuseppe Citerio
    Intensive Care Medicine, 2023, 49 : 583 - 586
  • [34] Use of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Blunt Traumatic Injury Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
    Trivedi, Jaimin R.
    Alotaibi, Amal
    Sweeney, Joseph C.
    Fox, Matthew P.
    van Berkel, Victor
    Adkins, Kandis
    Condley, Clay
    Alwair, Hazaim
    Slaughter, Mark S.
    ASAIO JOURNAL, 2022, 68 (04) : E60 - E61
  • [35] Machine Learning Opportunities in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients
    Noor, M. Marzia
    Rahman, Md Moshiur
    Agrawal, Amit
    Moscote-Salazar, Luis Rafael
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA, 2025,
  • [36] Prediction of Neurological Deterioration of Patients with Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Using Machine Learning
    Caracol, Gem Ralph
    Choi, Jin-gyu
    Park, Jae-Sung
    Son, Byung-chul
    Jeon, Sin-soo
    Lee, Kwan-Sung
    Shin, Yong Sam
    Hwang, Dae-joon
    STATISTICS AND DATA SCIENCE, RSSDS 2019, 2019, 1150 : 198 - 210
  • [37] Prediction of intracranial pressure crises after severe traumatic brain injury using machine learning algorithms
    Petrov, Dmitriy
    Miranda, Stephen P.
    Balu, Ramani
    Wathen, Connor
    Vaz, Alex
    Mohan, Vinodh
    Colon, Christian
    Diaz-Arrastia, Ramon
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 139 (02) : 528 - 535
  • [38] Machine Learning Algorithms and Quantitative Electroencephalography Predictors for Outcome Prediction in Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review
    Noor, Nor Safira Elaina Mohd
    Ibrahim, Haidi
    IEEE ACCESS, 2020, 8 : 102075 - 102092
  • [39] Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
    Rahul Raj
    Teemu Luostarinen
    Eetu Pursiainen
    Jussi P. Posti
    Riikka S. K. Takala
    Stepani Bendel
    Teijo Konttila
    Miikka Korja
    Scientific Reports, 9
  • [40] Machine learning-based dynamic mortality prediction after traumatic brain injury
    Raj, Rahul
    Luostarinen, Teemu
    Pursiainen, Eetu
    Posti, Jussi P.
    Takala, Riikka S. K.
    Bendel, Stepani
    Konttila, Teijo
    Korja, Miikka
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2019, 9 (1)