Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Ruoran [1 ]
Cai, Linrui [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
He, Min [4 ]
Xu, Jianguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Inst Drug Clin Trial GCP, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dis Women & Children, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
traumatic brain injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; machine learning; prognosis factors; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; COAGULOPATHY; COAGULATION; MORTALITY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59010171
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly develops in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and is a risk factor for poor prognosis. We designed this study to evaluate the performance of several machine learning algorithms for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. Methods: TBI patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were eligible for this study. ARDS was identified according to the Berlin definition. Included TBI patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation cohort with a ratio of 7:3. Several machine learning algorithms were utilized to develop predictive models with five-fold cross validation for ARDS including extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, Random Forest, adaptive boosting, complement naive Bayes, and support vector machine. The performance of machine learning algorithms were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F score. Results: 649 TBI patients from the MIMIC-III database were included with an ARDS incidence of 49.5%. The random forest performed the best in predicting ARDS in the training cohort with an AUC of 1.000. The XGBoost and AdaBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.989 and 0.815 in the training cohort. The random forest still performed the best in predicting ARDS in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.652. AdaBoost and XGBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.631 and 0.620 in the validation cohort. Several mutual top features in the random forest and AdaBoost were discovered including age, initial systolic blood pressure and heart rate, Abbreviated Injury Score chest, white blood cells, platelets, and international normalized ratio. Conclusions: The random forest and AdaBoost based models have stable and good performance for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. These models could help clinicians to evaluate the risk of ARDS in early stages after TBI and consequently adjust treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] The acute respiratory distress syndrome following isolated severe traumatic brain injury
    Hendrickson, Carolyn M.
    Howard, Benjamin M.
    Kornblith, Lucy Z.
    Conroy, Amanda S.
    Nelson, Mary F.
    Zhuo, Hanjing
    Liu, Kathleen D.
    Manley, Geoffrey T.
    Matthay, Michael A.
    Calfee, Carolyn S.
    Cohen, Mitchell J.
    JOURNAL OF TRAUMA AND ACUTE CARE SURGERY, 2016, 80 (06): : 989 - 997
  • [12] Refining outcome prediction after traumatic brain injury with machine learning algorithms
    Bark, D.
    Boman, M.
    Depreitere, B.
    Wright, D. W.
    Lewen, A.
    Enblad, P.
    Hanell, A.
    Rostami, E.
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2024, 14 (01)
  • [13] Mechanical ventilation in acute brain injury patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Humayun, Mariyam
    Premraj, Lavienraj
    Shah, Vishank
    Cho, Sung-Min
    FRONTIERS IN MEDICINE, 2022, 9
  • [14] Supervised machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)
    Le, Sidney
    Pellegrini, Emily
    Green-Saxena, Abigail
    Summers, Charlotte
    Hoffman, Jana
    Calvert, Jacob
    Das, Ritankar
    JOURNAL OF CRITICAL CARE, 2020, 60 : 96 - 102
  • [15] Acute respiratory distress syndrome in traumatic brain injury: how do we manage it?
    Della Torre, Valentina
    Badenes, Rafael
    Corradi, Francesco
    Racca, Fabrizio
    Lavinio, Andrea
    Matta, Basil
    Bilotta, Federico
    Robba, Chiara
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2017, 9 (12) : 5368 - 5381
  • [16] acute respiratory distress syndrome in traumatic brain injury: how do we manage it?
    Sakka, Samir G.
    Tagami, Takashi
    Kirov, Mikhail
    Perel, Azriel
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2018, 10 (03) : E221 - E223
  • [17] Traumatic Brain Injury and Pediatric Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Moving the Field Forward*
    Tasker, Robert C.
    PEDIATRIC CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2020, 21 (02) : 198 - 199
  • [18] Impact of Acute Lung Injury and Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome After Traumatic Brain Injury in the United States
    Rincon, Fred
    Ghosh, Sayantani
    Dey, Saugat
    Maltenfort, Mitchell
    Vibbert, Matthew
    Urtecho, Jacqueline
    McBride, William
    Moussouttas, Michael
    Bell, Rodney
    Ratliff, John K.
    Jallo, Jack
    NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 71 (04) : 795 - 803
  • [19] Machine learning for the early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) in patients with sepsis in the ICU based on clinical data
    Jiang, Zhenzhen
    Liu, Leping
    Du, Lin
    Lv, Shanshan
    Liang, Fang
    Luo, Yanwei
    Wang, Chunjiang
    Shen, Qin
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (06)
  • [20] Early prediction of acute respiratory distress syndrome complicated by acute pancreatitis based on four machine learning models
    Zhang, Mengran
    Pang, Mingge
    CLINICS, 2023, 78