Prediction of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

被引:4
|
作者
Wang, Ruoran [1 ]
Cai, Linrui [2 ,3 ]
Zhang, Jing [1 ]
He, Min [4 ]
Xu, Jianguo [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Neurosurg, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[2] Sichuan Univ, West China Univ Hosp 2, Inst Drug Clin Trial GCP, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[3] Sichuan Univ, Dis Women & Children, Minist Educ, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
[4] Sichuan Univ, West China Hosp, Dept Crit Care Med, Chengdu 610041, Peoples R China
来源
MEDICINA-LITHUANIA | 2023年 / 59卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
traumatic brain injury; acute respiratory distress syndrome; machine learning; prognosis factors; ACUTE LUNG INJURY; COAGULOPATHY; COAGULATION; MORTALITY; PRESSURE;
D O I
10.3390/medicina59010171
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) commonly develops in traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients and is a risk factor for poor prognosis. We designed this study to evaluate the performance of several machine learning algorithms for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. Methods: TBI patients from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III (MIMIC-III) database were eligible for this study. ARDS was identified according to the Berlin definition. Included TBI patients were divided into the training cohort and the validation cohort with a ratio of 7:3. Several machine learning algorithms were utilized to develop predictive models with five-fold cross validation for ARDS including extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine, Random Forest, adaptive boosting, complement naive Bayes, and support vector machine. The performance of machine learning algorithms were evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F score. Results: 649 TBI patients from the MIMIC-III database were included with an ARDS incidence of 49.5%. The random forest performed the best in predicting ARDS in the training cohort with an AUC of 1.000. The XGBoost and AdaBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.989 and 0.815 in the training cohort. The random forest still performed the best in predicting ARDS in the validation cohort with an AUC of 0.652. AdaBoost and XGBoost ranked the second and the third with an AUC of 0.631 and 0.620 in the validation cohort. Several mutual top features in the random forest and AdaBoost were discovered including age, initial systolic blood pressure and heart rate, Abbreviated Injury Score chest, white blood cells, platelets, and international normalized ratio. Conclusions: The random forest and AdaBoost based models have stable and good performance for predicting ARDS in TBI patients. These models could help clinicians to evaluate the risk of ARDS in early stages after TBI and consequently adjust treatment decisions.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Machine learning-based prediction model of acute kidney injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Wei, Shuxing
    Zhang, Yongsheng
    Dong, Hongmeng
    Chen, Ying
    Wang, Xiya
    Zhu, Xiaomei
    Zhang, Guang
    Guo, Shubin
    BMC PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [2] Machine learning-based prediction model of acute kidney injury in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome
    Shuxing Wei
    Yongsheng Zhang
    Hongmeng Dong
    Ying Chen
    Xiya Wang
    Xiaomei Zhu
    Guang Zhang
    Shubin Guo
    BMC Pulmonary Medicine, 23
  • [3] Prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury patients using machine learning algorithms
    Khalili, Hosseinali
    Rismani, Maziyar
    Nematollahi, Mohammad Ali
    Masoudi, Mohammad Sadegh
    Asadollahi, Arefeh
    Taheri, Reza
    Pourmontaseri, Hossein
    Valibeygi, Adib
    Roshanzamir, Mohamad
    Alizadehsani, Roohallah
    Niakan, Amin
    Andishgar, Aref
    Islam, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful
    Acharya, U. Rajendra
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [4] Prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury patients using machine learning algorithms
    Miri, MirMohammad
    Cone, Jamie
    ARCHIVES OF TRAUMA RESEARCH, 2023, 12 (04) : 217 - 219
  • [5] Prognosis prediction in traumatic brain injury patients using machine learning algorithms
    Hosseinali Khalili
    Maziyar Rismani
    Mohammad Ali Nematollahi
    Mohammad Sadegh Masoudi
    Arefeh Asadollahi
    Reza Taheri
    Hossein Pourmontaseri
    Adib Valibeygi
    Mohamad Roshanzamir
    Roohallah Alizadehsani
    Amin Niakan
    Aref Andishgar
    Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam
    U. Rajendra Acharya
    Scientific Reports, 13
  • [6] Moderate/severe acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with or without traumatic brain injury
    Weirich, Priscila P.
    Tozo, Tatiane C.
    Wandeur, Vanessa
    Duarte, Pericles A. D.
    TRAUMA-ENGLAND, 2015, 17 (04): : 274 - 281
  • [7] PREVALENCE AND OUTCOME OF ACUTE RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME IN TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY
    Fan, Tracey
    Huang, Merry
    Gedansky, Aron
    Price, Carrie
    Robba, Chiara
    Hernandez, Adrian
    Cho, Sung-Min
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2022, 50 (01) : 412 - 412
  • [8] Prediction of Mortality in Geriatric Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithms
    Wang, Ruoran
    Zeng, Xihang
    Long, Yujuan
    Zhang, Jing
    Bo, Hong
    He, Min
    Xu, Jianguo
    BRAIN SCIENCES, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [9] Mortality prediction for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome based on machine learning: a population-based study
    Huang, Bingsheng
    Liang, Dong
    Zou, Rushi
    Yu, Xiaxia
    Dan, Guo
    Huang, Haofan
    Liu, Heng
    Liu, Yong
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [10] Machine Learning Tools for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Detection and Prediction
    Rubulotta, Francesca
    Bahrami, Sahar
    Marshall, Dominic C.
    Komorowski, Matthieu
    CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2024, 52 (11) : 1768 - 1780