Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Hsu, Chi-Pin [1 ]
Wu, Chen-Te [4 ]
Chen, Chao-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, High Speed 3D Printing Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthpaed Surg,Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst BioMed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Glenoid version; Glenoid inclination; 3D preoperative planning; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Centerline; PATIENT-SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; COMPONENT; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INCLINATION; SELECTION; SURGEON; EROSION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. Materials and methods Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. Results The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63 degrees +/- 6.60 (2.87 degrees +/- 5.97) and -1.96 degrees +/- 4.24 (-3.21 degrees +/- 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10 degrees was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). Conclusion The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (+/- 10 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:4065 / 4075
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Novel 3D Printed Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis for Successful Hemipelvic Arthroplasty: A Case Study
    Xin Zhao
    Jianlin Xiao
    Yu Sun
    Zhe Zhu
    Meng Xu
    Xiaonan Wang
    Feifei Lin
    Yanbing Wang
    Jincheng Wang
    Journal of Bionic Engineering, 2018, 15 : 1067 - 1074
  • [42] 3D imaging, 3D printing and 3D virtual planning in endodontics
    Shah, Pratik
    Chong, B. S.
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2018, 22 (02) : 641 - 654
  • [43] 3D imaging, 3D printing and 3D virtual planning in endodontics
    Pratik Shah
    B. S. Chong
    Clinical Oral Investigations, 2018, 22 : 641 - 654
  • [44] Partial talar replacement with a novel 3D printed prosthesis
    Cui, Yidong
    Chen, Bin
    Wang, Gang
    Wang, Juntao
    Liu, Ben
    Zhu, Lei
    Xu, Qingjia
    COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2023, 28 (01)
  • [45] Computerized 3D morphological analysis of glenoid orientation
    Ghafurian, Soheil
    Galdi, Balazs
    Bastian, Sevag
    Tan, Virak
    Li, Kang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2016, 34 (04) : 692 - 698
  • [46] CLINICAL UTILITY OF PRECISION 3D PRINTED MODEL FOR PREOPERATIVE PLANNING AND SURGICAL REHEARSAL
    Soputro, Nicolas A.
    Ferguson, Ethan L.
    Scovell, Jason
    Ramos-Carpinteyro, Roxana
    Kaouk, Jihad
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2024, 211 (05): : E637 - E637
  • [47] Evidence of structural cavities in 3D printed acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty
    Hothi, Harry
    Dall'Ava, Lorenzo
    Henckel, Johann
    Di Laura, Anna
    Iacoviello, Francesco
    Shearing, Paul
    Hart, Alister
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL MATERIALS RESEARCH PART B-APPLIED BIOMATERIALS, 2020, 108 (05) : 1779 - 1789
  • [48] Is preoperative 3D planning reliable for predicting postoperative clinical differences in range of motion between two stem designs in reverse shoulder arthroplasty
    Gauci, Marc-Olivier
    Glevarec, Laure
    Bronsard, Nicolas
    Cointat, Caroline
    Pelletier, Yann
    Boileau, Pascal
    Gonzalez, Jean-Francois
    JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2024, 33 (08) : 1771 - 1780
  • [49] 3D PRINTED MINIATURIZED SOFT MICROSWIMMER FOR MULTIMODAL 3D AIR-LIQUID NAVIGATION AND MANIPULATION
    Decanini, Dominique
    Harouri, Abdelmounaim
    Mizushima, Ayako
    Kim, Beomjoon
    Mita, Yoshio
    Hwang, Gilgueng
    2023 IEEE 36TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MICRO ELECTRO MECHANICAL SYSTEMS, MEMS, 2023, : 21 - 24
  • [50] 3D motion analysis of the upper extremities and its application in shoulder arthroplasty
    Raiss, P.
    Maier, M. W.
    Wolf, S.
    Rettig, O.
    Loew, M.
    Kasten, P.
    OBERE EXTREMITAET-SCHULTER-ELLENBOGEN-HAND-UPPER EXTREMITY-SHOULDER ELBOW HAND, 2010, 5 (01): : 27 - 36