Difference analysis of the glenoid centerline between 3D preoperative planning and 3D printed prosthesis manipulation in total shoulder arthroplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Hsu, Chi-Pin [1 ]
Wu, Chen-Te [4 ]
Chen, Chao-Yu [2 ,3 ]
Lin, Shang-Chih [5 ]
Hsu, Kuo-Yao [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, High Speed 3D Printing Res Ctr, Taipei, Taiwan
[2] Chang Gung Univ, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Div Sports Med, Dept Orthpaed Surg,Coll Med, Taoyuan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[3] Chang Gung Univ, Coll Med, Musculoskeletal Res Ctr, Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[4] Chang Gung Mem Hosp, Dept Med Imaging & Intervent Radiol, Taoyuan, Taiwan
[5] Natl Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Grad Inst BioMed Engn, Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
Glenoid version; Glenoid inclination; 3D preoperative planning; Glenohumeral osteoarthritis; Centerline; PATIENT-SPECIFIC INSTRUMENTATION; COMPONENT; ACCURACY; NAVIGATION; INCLINATION; SELECTION; SURGEON; EROSION; VERSION;
D O I
10.1007/s00402-022-04688-8
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction Excessive version and inclination of the glenoid component during total shoulder arthroplasty can lead to glenohumeral instability, early loosening, and even failure. The orientation and position of the central pin determine the version and inclination of the glenoid component. The purpose of this study was to compare the differences in centerline position and orientation obtained using "3D preoperative planning based on the best-fit method for glenoid elements" and the surgeon's manipulation. Materials and methods Twenty-nine CT images of glenohumeral osteoarthritis of the shoulder were reconstructed into a 3D model, and a 3D printer was used to create an in vitro model for the surgeon to drill the center pin. The 3D shoulder model was also used for 3D preoperative planning (3DPP) using the best-fit method for glenoid elements. The in vitro model was scanned and the version, inclination and center position were measured to compare with the 3DPP results. Results The respective mean inclinations (versions) of the surgeon and 3DPP were -2.63 degrees +/- 6.60 (2.87 degrees +/- 5.97) and -1.96 degrees +/- 4.24 (-3.21 degrees +/- 4.00), respectively. There was no significant difference in the inclination and version of the surgeon and 3DPP. For surgeons, the probability of the inclination and version being greater than 10 degrees was 13.8% (4/29) and 10.3% (3/29), respectively. Compared to the 3DPP results, the surgeon's center position was shifted down an average of 1.63 mm. There was a significant difference in the center position of the surgeon and 3DPP (p < 0.05). Conclusion The central pin drilled by surgeons using general instruments was significantly lower than those defined using 3D preoperative planning and standard central definitions. 3D preoperative planning prevents the version and inclination of the centerline from exceeding safe values (+/- 10 degrees).
引用
收藏
页码:4065 / 4075
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The "Norris PSI": 3D Planning and Patient-specific Instruments for Reconstruction of Large Glenoid Defects and Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty
    Eid, Karim
    Haefeli, Mathias
    Norris, Tom R.
    TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2018, 19 (02): : 62 - 66
  • [32] Case Report: Custom made 3D implants for glenoid tumor reconstruction should be designed as reverse total shoulder arthroplasty
    Evrard, Robin
    Ledoux, Antoine
    Docquier, Pierre-Louis
    Geenens, Florine
    Schubert, Thomas
    FRONTIERS IN SURGERY, 2024, 11
  • [33] The biomechanical difference between running with traditional and 3D printed orthoses
    Mo, Shiwei
    Leung, Sam H. S.
    Chan, Zoe Y. S.
    Sze, Louis K. Y.
    Mok, Kam-Ming
    Yung, Patrick S. H.
    Ferber, Reed
    Cheung, Roy T. H.
    JOURNAL OF SPORTS SCIENCES, 2019, 37 (19) : 2191 - 2197
  • [34] 3D Printed Anatomy-Specific Fixture for Consistent Glenoid Cavity Position in Shoulder Simulator
    Venne, Gabriel
    Esau, Greg
    Bicknell, Ryan T.
    Bryant, J. Tim
    JOURNAL OF HEALTHCARE ENGINEERING, 2018, 2018
  • [35] 2D/3D Registration with Rigid Alignment of the Pelvic Bone for Assisting in Total Hip Arthroplasty Preoperative Planning
    Suca Velando, Christian A.
    Castro Gutierrez, Eveling G.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2020, 11 (05) : 681 - 688
  • [36] 3D Printed
    Good, Andrew
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 2016, 74 (07) : 984 - 989
  • [37] Preoperative Planning for Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty: Does the Clinical Range of Motion Match the Planned 3D Humeral Displacement?
    Yoon, Diane Ji Yun
    Odri, Guillaume-Anthony
    Favard, Luc
    Samargandi, Ramy
    Berhouet, Julien
    JOURNAL OF PERSONALIZED MEDICINE, 2023, 13 (05):
  • [38] Automated preoperative planning of femoral component for total hip arthroplasty (THA) from 3D CT images
    Otomaru, Itaru
    Nakamoto, Masahiko
    Takao, Masaki
    Sugano, Nobuhiko
    Kagiyama, Yoshiyuki
    Yoshikawa, Hideki
    Tada, Yukio
    Sato, Yoshinobu
    MEDICAL IMAGING AND AUGMENTED REALITY, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, 5128 : 40 - +
  • [39] Finding Glenoid Surface on Scapula in 3D Medical Images for Shoulder Joint Implant Operation Planning-3D OCR
    Sadeghi, Majid Mohammad
    Kececi, Emin Faruk
    Bilsel, Kerem
    Aralasmak, Ayse
    NINTH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON MACHINE VISION (ICMV 2016), 2017, 10341
  • [40] Novel 3D Printed Modular Hemipelvic Prosthesis for Successful Hemipelvic Arthroplasty: A Case Study
    Zhao, Xin
    Xiao, Jianlin
    Sun, Yu
    Zhu, Zhe
    Xu, Meng
    Wang, Xiaonan
    Lin, Feifei
    Wang, Yanbing
    Wang, Jincheng
    JOURNAL OF BIONIC ENGINEERING, 2018, 15 (06) : 1067 - 1074