Refined scan protocol for the evaluation of pulmonary perfusion standardized image quality and reduced radiation dose in dynamic chest radiography

被引:1
|
作者
Takakura, Kenta [1 ]
Yamasaki, Yuzo [2 ]
Kuramoto, Taku [3 ]
Yoshidome, Satoshi [1 ]
Hida, Tomoyuki [4 ]
Kamitani, Takeshi [2 ]
Yoshikawa, Hideki [1 ]
Kato, Toyoyuki [1 ]
Ishigami, Kousei [2 ]
机构
[1] Kyushu Univ Hosp, Dept Med Technol, Div Radiol, Fukuoka, Japan
[2] Kyushu Univ, Grad Sch Med Sci, Dept Clin Radiol, 3-1-1 Maidash,Higashi Ku, Fukuoka 8128582, Japan
[3] Kobe Tokiwa Univ, Fac Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol Technol, Kobe, Japan
[4] Onga Nakama Med Assoc Onga Hosp, Dept Radiol, Fukuoka, Japan
来源
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
body mass index; dynamic chest radiography; pulmonary perfusion; scan protocol; OPTIMIZATION; VENTILATION;
D O I
10.1002/acm2.14222
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: Dynamic chest radiography (DCR) is a novel imaging technique used to noninvasively evaluate pulmonary perfusion. However, the standard DCR protocol, which is roughly adapted to the patient's body size, occasionally causes over- or underexposure, which could influence clinical evaluation. Therefore, we proposed a refined protocol by increasing the number of patient body mass index (BMI) categories from three to seven groups and verified its usefulness by comparing the image sensitivity indicators (S-values) and entrance surface doses (ESDs) of the conventional protocol with those of our refined protocol.Methods: This retrospective observational study included 388 datasets (standing position, 224; supine position, 164) for the conventional protocol (December 2019-April 2021) and 336 datasets (standing position, 233; supine position, 103) for the refined protocol (June-November 2021). The conventional protocol (BMI-3 protocol) divided the patients into three BMI groups (BMI < 17, 17 <= BMI < 25, and BMI >= 25 kg/m(2)), whereas the refined protocol (BMI-7 protocol) divided the patients into seven BMI groups (BMI < 17, 17 <= BMI < 20, 20 <= BMI < 23, 23 <= BMI < 26, 26 <= BMI < 29, 29 <= BMI < 32, and BMI >= 32 kg/m(2)). The coefficients of variation (CVs) for the S-values and ESDs acquired using the two protocols were compared.Results: The CVs of the S-values in the BMI-7 protocol group were significantly lower than those in the BMI-3 protocol group for the standing (28.8% vs. 16.7%; p < 0.01) and supine (24.5% vs. 17.7%; p < 0.01) positions. The ESDs of patients scanned using the BMI-7 protocol were significantly lower than those scanned using the BMI-3 protocol in the standing (1.3 vs. 1.1 mGy; p < 0.01) and supine positions (2.5 vs. 1.6 mGy; p < 0.01), although the mean BMI of the two groups were similar.Conclusion: We introduced the BMI-7 protocol and demonstrated its standardized image quality and reduced radiation exposure in patients undergoing DCR.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Head CT: Image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children
    Hyun Gi Kim
    Ho-Joon Lee
    Seung-Koo Lee
    Hyun Ji Kim
    Myung-Joon Kim
    European Radiology, 2017, 27 : 3609 - 3617
  • [22] Head CT: Image quality improvement with ASIR-V using a reduced radiation dose protocol for children
    Kim, Hyun Gi
    Lee, Ho-Joon
    Lee, Seung-Koo
    Kim, Hyun Ji
    Kim, Myung-Joon
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (09) : 3609 - 3617
  • [23] Evaluation of image quality and radiation dose by adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique level for chest CT examination
    Hong, Sun Suk
    Lee, Jong-Woong
    Seo, Jeong Beom
    Jung, Jae-Eun
    Choi, Jiwon
    Kweon, Dae Cheol
    RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2013, 157 (02) : 163 - 171
  • [24] Evaluation of radiation dose and image quality of CT scan for whole-body pediatric PET/CT: A phantom study
    Yang, Ching-Ching
    Liu, Shu-Hsin
    Mok, Greta S. P.
    Wu, Tung-Hsin
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2014, 41 (09)
  • [25] Low Radiation Dose and High Image Quality of 320-Row Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Using a Small Dose of Contrast Medium and Refined Scan Timing Prediction
    Shirasaka, Takashi
    Nagao, Michinobu
    Yamasaki, Yuzo
    Kojima, Tsukasa
    Kondo, Masatoshi
    Hamasaki, Hiroshi
    Kamitani, Takeshi
    Kato, Toyoyuki
    Asayama, Yoshiki
    JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2020, 44 (01) : 7 - 12
  • [26] Implementing a Novel Through-Glass Chest Radiography Technique for COVID-19 Patients: Image Quality, Radiation Dose Optimization, and Practical Considerations
    Chan, Jessica
    Auffermann, William
    Jenkins, Peter
    Streitmatter, Seth
    Phuong-Anh Duong
    CURRENT PROBLEMS IN DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY, 2022, 51 (01) : 38 - 45
  • [27] Impact of radiation dose on the detection of interstitial lung changes and image quality in low-dose chest CT-Assessment in multiple dose levels from a single patient scan
    Martini, Katharina
    Jungblut, Lisa
    Sartoretti, Thomas
    Langhart, Sabinne
    Yalynska, Tetyana
    Nemeth, Bence
    Frauenfelder, Thomas
    Euler, Andre
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2023, 166
  • [28] Deep Learning Versus Iterative Reconstruction for CT Pulmonary Angiography in the Emergency Setting: Improved Image Quality and Reduced Radiation Dose
    Lenfant, Marc
    Chevallier, Olivier
    Comby, Pierre-Olivier
    Secco, Gregory
    Haioun, Karim
    Ricolfi, Frederic
    Lemogne, Brivael
    Loffroy, Romaric
    DIAGNOSTICS, 2020, 10 (08)
  • [29] Evaluation of Radiation Dose and Image Quality using High-Pitch 70-kV Chest CT in Immunosuppressed Patients
    Yel, Ibrahim
    Martin, Simon S.
    Wichmann, Julian L.
    Lenga, Lukas
    Albrecht, Moritz H.
    Bucher, Andreas M.
    Kaltenbach, Benjamin
    Polkowski, Christoph
    Booz, Christian
    Vogl, Thomas J.
    Hammerstingl, Renate Maria
    ROFO-FORTSCHRITTE AUF DEM GEBIET DER RONTGENSTRAHLEN UND DER BILDGEBENDEN VERFAHREN, 2019, 191 (02): : 122 - 129
  • [30] Effects of patient size on radiation dose reduction and image quality in low-kVp CT pulmonary angiography performed with reduced IV contrast dose
    Sodickson A.
    Weiss M.
    Emergency Radiology, 2012, 19 (5) : 437 - 445