The minimal clinically important difference in the treadmill six-minute walk test in active women with breast cancer during and after oncological treatments

被引:8
|
作者
Cantarero-Villanueva, Irene [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Postigo-Martin, Paula [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Granger, Catherine L. [4 ,5 ]
Waterland, Jamie [4 ]
Galiano-Castillo, Noelia [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Denehy, Linda [6 ,7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] Univ Granada, Hlth Sci Fac, Granada, Spain
[2] Sport & Hlth Res Ctr IMUDs, Granada, Spain
[3] Inst Invest Biomed Ibs GRANADA, Granada, Spain
[4] Univ Melbourne, Sch Hlth Sci, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[5] Royal Melbourne Hosp, Dept Physiotherapy, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[6] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne Sch Hlth Sci, BAppScPhysio, GDipPhysioCardio, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[7] Peter MacCallum Canc Ctr, Allied Hlth Div, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[8] Inst Breathing & Sleep, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
6MWT; breast cancer; minimal clinically important difference; physical function; rehabilitation professionals; treadmill; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DISTANCE; GUIDELINES; SURVIVORS; HALLWAY; STATEMENT;
D O I
10.1080/09638288.2022.2043461
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Purpose To examine the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) in the treadmill 6-minute walk test (6MWT) in women with breast cancer. Materials and methods A secondary analysis of cross-sectional data from 112 women who were undergoing chemotherapy or had undergone anticancer treatment was conducted. Participants completed the 6MWT on a treadmill and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30) twice, eight weeks apart. Change in the physical function domain of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 was used to classify the "positive change" subgroup (>= 5 points difference) and the "unchanged" subgroup (<5 points difference). This was combined with the distance difference from the 6MWTs, determining the MCID as the cut-off from the area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve (anchor-based determination). The MCID was also determined from (1) the effect size and (2) the difference in standard error (SEM) of the results of the first and second 6MWT (distribution-based determination). Results The MCIDs in the during-chemotherapy group was 66.5 and 41.5 m and those in the after-treatment group to be 41.4 and 40.5 m (SEM and effect size based respectively). Conclusions The MCID in the treadmill 6MWT distance could be used to interpret changes in the physical health status of women with breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:871 / 878
页数:8
相关论文
共 41 条
  • [21] Can the Six-Minute Walk Test Be Used to Individualize Physical Activity Intensity in Patients with Breast Cancer?
    Tubiana-Mathieu, Nicole
    Cornette, Thibault
    Mandigout, Stephane
    Leobon, Sophie
    Vincent, Francois
    Venat, Laurence
    Deluche, Elise
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (22)
  • [22] Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review
    Bohannon, Richard W.
    Crouch, Rebecca
    JOURNAL OF EVALUATION IN CLINICAL PRACTICE, 2017, 23 (02) : 377 - 381
  • [23] Validation of test performance characteristics and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk test in patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
    Nathan, Steven D.
    du Bois, Roland M.
    Albera, Carlo
    Bradford, Williamson Z.
    Costabel, Ulrich
    Kartashov, Alex
    Noble, Paul W.
    Sahn, Steven A.
    Valeyre, Dominique
    Weycker, Derek
    King, Talmadge E., Jr.
    RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2015, 109 (07) : 914 - 922
  • [24] The minimally clinically important difference in the 2-minute walk test for people in the subacute phase after a stroke
    Bowman, Thomas
    Mestanza Mattos, Fabiola Giovanna
    Allera Longo, Cristina
    Bocini, Serena
    Gennuso, Michele
    Marazzini, Francesca
    Giuseppe Materazzi, Francesco
    Pelosin, Elisa
    Putzolu, Martina
    Salvalaggio, Silvia
    Turolla, Andrea
    Mezzarobba, Susanna
    Cattaneo, Davide
    TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2024,
  • [25] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
    Yanagisawa, Takuya
    Tatematsu, Noriatsu
    Horiuchi, Mioko
    Migitaka, Saki
    Yasuda, Shotaro
    Itatsu, Keita
    Kubota, Tomoyuki
    Sugiura, Hideshi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (06)
  • [26] Minimal important difference of the 6-minute walk test after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Murao, Masanobu
    Kondo, Tadakazu
    Hamada, Ryota
    Miyasaka, Junsuke
    Matsushita, Michiko
    Otagaki, Ayumi
    Kajimoto, Taishi
    Arai, Yasuyuki
    Kanda, Junya
    Nankaku, Manabu
    Ikeguchi, Ryosuke
    Takaori-Kondo, Akifumi
    Matsuda, Shuichi
    DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2024, 46 (15) : 3449 - 3456
  • [27] Minimal important improvement thresholds for the six-minute walk test in a knee arthroplasty cohort: triangulation of anchor- and distribution-based methods
    J. M. Naylor
    K. Mills
    M. Buhagiar
    R. Fortunato
    R. Wright
    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 17
  • [28] Minimal important improvement thresholds for the six-minute walk test in a knee arthroplasty cohort: triangulation of anchor- and distribution-based methods
    Naylor, J. M.
    Mills, K.
    Buhagiar, M.
    Fortunato, R.
    Wright, R.
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2016, 17
  • [29] Electrocardiographic variables during recovery after six-minute walk test in patients with chronic heart failure and sinus rhythm
    Peychev, YD
    Sirakova, VN
    CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (17) : 475 - 475
  • [30] Minimal clinically important difference in walking velocity, gait profile score and two minute walk test for individuals with lower limb amputation
    Carse, Bruce
    Scott, Helen
    Davie-Smith, Fiona
    Brady, Laura
    Colvin, John
    GAIT & POSTURE, 2021, 88 : 221 - 224