Minimal clinically important difference for change in 6-minute walk test distance of adults with pathology: a systematic review

被引:424
|
作者
Bohannon, Richard W. [1 ]
Crouch, Rebecca [1 ]
机构
[1] Campbell Univ, Dept Phys Therapy, Coll Pharm & Hlth Sci, Lillington, NC USA
关键词
clinimetrics; gait; measurement; responsiveness;
D O I
10.1111/jep.12629
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Rationale, aims, and objectives The 6-minute walk test (6MWT) is widely used as a test of functional exercise capacity. Several studies have reported the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the 6MWT; however, the findings of the studies have not been examined in the context of one another. In this review, we aimed to summarize available information on the MCID for the 6MWT performed by patients with pathology. Methods Relevant literature was identified by searches of 3 electronic databases (PubMed, Scopus, and Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health), examination of article reference lists, and consultation with an expert. Inclusion necessitated that articles (1) be original, full length, and peer reviewed, (2) report an MCID for the 6MWT, and (3) focus on adults with medical issues. Articles were excluded if the MCID was determined by a procedure other than receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Articles were abstracted for information on participants, interventions, 6MWT distance, and the determination of MCID. Quality was assessed using a hybrid 9-item (0- to 18-point) instrument. Results Six articles were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The populations studied included people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, lung cancer, coronary artery disease, diffuse parenchymal lung disease, and non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis and adults with fear of falling. Mean baseline 6MWT distances ranged from 295 to 551m. The MCIDs for which the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was at least 0.70 ranged from 14.0 to 30.5m. Conclusions Based on our findings, a change of 14.0 to 30.5m may be clinically important across multiple patient groups.
引用
收藏
页码:377 / 381
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Determining the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for 6-Minute Walk Distance in Fibromyalgia
    Kaleth, Anthony S.
    Slaven, James E.
    Ang, Dennis C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2016, 95 (10) : 738 - 745
  • [2] Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the 6-Minute Walk Test in People With Stroke
    Fulk, George D.
    He, Ying
    JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGIC PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2018, 42 (04): : 235 - 240
  • [3] Minimal important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in lung cancer
    Granger, Catherine L.
    Holland, Anne E.
    Gordon, Ian R.
    Denehy, Linda
    CHRONIC RESPIRATORY DISEASE, 2015, 12 (02) : 146 - 154
  • [4] Biovaribility, minimal important difference and change of the 6-minute walk test in chronic heart failure
    Taeger, T.
    Wians, F. H.
    Cebola, R.
    Froehlich, H.
    Katus, H. A.
    Frankenstein, L.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEART FAILURE, 2013, 12 : S94 - S94
  • [5] Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference of the 6-minute walk distance in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery
    Yanagisawa, Takuya
    Tatematsu, Noriatsu
    Horiuchi, Mioko
    Migitaka, Saki
    Yasuda, Shotaro
    Itatsu, Keita
    Kubota, Tomoyuki
    Sugiura, Hideshi
    SUPPORTIVE CARE IN CANCER, 2024, 32 (06)
  • [6] 6-MINUTE WALK DISTANCE LEARNING EFFECT AND MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE - IS IMPROVEMENT SIGNIFICANT?
    Dawoodjee, A.
    Wilkinson, S.
    Jell, P.
    RESPIROLOGY, 2020, 25 : 12 - 12
  • [7] MINIMAL IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE AND CLINICAL DETERMINANTS OF THE 6-MINUTE WALK DISTANCE IN LUNG CANCER
    Granger, C.
    Holland, A.
    Gordon, I
    Denehy
    RESPIROLOGY, 2015, 20 : 39 - 39
  • [8] Minimal important difference and clinical determinants of the 6-minute walk distance in lung cancer
    Granger, Catherine
    Holland, Anne
    Gordon, Ian
    Denehy, Linda
    EUROPEAN RESPIRATORY JOURNAL, 2014, 44
  • [9] Minimal clinically important difference in 6-minute walk distance estimated by multiple methods in inpatients with subacute cardiovascular disease
    Igarashi, Tatsuya
    Miyata, Kazuhiro
    Tamura, Shuntaro
    Otani, Tomohiro
    Iizuka, Takamitsu
    Usuda, Shigeru
    PHYSIOTHERAPY THEORY AND PRACTICE, 2024, 40 (09) : 1981 - 1989
  • [10] The Minimal Important Difference in the 6-Minute Walk Test for Patients with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension
    Mathai, Stephen C.
    Puhan, Milo A.
    Lam, Diana
    Wise, Robert A.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF RESPIRATORY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2012, 186 (05) : 428 - 433