Elastic Deformation of Optical Coherence Tomography Images of Diabetic Macular Edema for Deep-Learning Models Training: How Far to Go?

被引:1
|
作者
Bar-David, Daniel [1 ]
Bar-David, Laura [2 ]
Shapira, Yinon [3 ]
Leibu, Rina
Dori, Dalia
Gebara, Aseel
Schneor, Ronit [1 ]
Fischer, Anath [1 ]
Soudry, Shiri [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Fac Mech Engn, IL-3200003 Haifa, Israel
[2] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Dept Ophthalmol, Haifa, Israel
[3] Carmel Hosp, Dept Ophthalmol, IL-3436212 Haifa, Israel
[4] Rambam Hlth Care Campus, Clin Res Inst Rambam, IL-3109601 Haifa, Israel
[5] Technion Israel Inst Technol, Ruth & Bruce Rappaport Fac Med, IL-3525433 Haifa, Israel
关键词
Data augmentation; OCT; deep learning; DME; elastic deformation; AUTOMATED DETECTION; SEGMENTATION; DISEASES; FLUID;
D O I
10.1109/JTEHM.2023.3294904
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Objective: To explore the clinical validity of elastic deformation of optical coherence tomography (OCT) images for data augmentation in the development of deep-learning model for detection of diabetic macular edema (DME). Methods: Prospective evaluation of OCT images of DME (n = 320) subject to elastic transformation, with the deformation intensity represented by (sigma). Three sets of images, each comprising 100 pairs of scans (100 original & 100 modified), were grouped according to the range of (sigma), including low-, medium- and high-degree of augmentation; (sigma = 1-6), (sigma = 7-12), and (sigma = 13-18), respectively. Three retina specialists evaluated all datasets in a blinded manner and designated each image as 'original' versus 'modified'. The rate of assignment of 'original' value to modified images (false-negative) was determined for each grader in each dataset. Results: The false-negative rates ranged between 71-77% for the low-, 63-76% for the medium-, and 50-75% for the high-augmentation categories. The corresponding rates of correct identification of original images ranged between 75-85% (p>0.05) in the low-, 73-85% (p>0.05 for graders 1 & 2, p = 0.01 for grader 3) in the medium-, and 81-91% (p<0.005) in the high-augmentation categories. In the subcategory (sigma = 7-9) the false-negative rates were 93-83%, whereas the rates of correctly identifying original images ranged between 89-99% (p>0.05 for all graders). Conclusions: Deformation of low-medium intensity (sigma = 1-9) may be applied without compromising OCT image representativeness in DME.
引用
收藏
页码:487 / 494
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Investigation of the Reproducibility of Portable Optical Coherence Tomography in Diabetic Macular Edema
    Chiku, Yoshiaki
    Hirano, Takao
    Nakamura, Marie
    Takahashi, Yoshiaki
    Miyasaka, Hideki
    Hoshiyama, Ken
    Murata, Toshinori
    PHARMACEUTICALS, 2024, 17 (10)
  • [42] Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema
    Chen, Haiying
    Tan, Mei Hong
    Pomerleau, Dustin
    Chong, Elaine W.
    Lim, Lyndell L.
    Symons, Robert Charles Andrew
    INVESTIGATIVE OPHTHALMOLOGY & VISUAL SCIENCE, 2018, 59 (09)
  • [43] Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema
    Chen, Haiying
    Tan, Mei Hong
    Pomerleau, Dustin
    Chong, Elaine W.
    Lim, Lyndell L.
    Symons, R. C. Andrew
    GRAEFES ARCHIVE FOR CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 258 (03) : 653 - 661
  • [44] The issue of performing optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema
    Rojas-Barrantes, Isabel
    Garay-Guerrero, Kevin Antonio
    IATREIA, 2023, 36 (02) : 141 - 143
  • [45] Temporal variation in diabetic macular edema measured by optical coherence tomography
    Frank, RN
    Schulz, L
    Abe, K
    Iezzi, R
    OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2004, 111 (02) : 211 - 217
  • [46] Optical coherence tomography image for automatic classification of diabetic macular edema
    WANG P.
    LI J.-L.
    DING H.
    Optica Applicata, 2021, 50 (04) : 567 - 577
  • [47] Optical coherence tomography assessment of the vitreoretinal relationship in diabetic macular edema
    Gaucher, D
    Tadayoni, R
    Erginay, A
    Haouchine, B
    Gaudric, A
    Massin, P
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2005, 139 (05) : 807 - 813
  • [48] Optical coherence tomography analysis of patients with untreated diabetic macular edema
    Haiying Chen
    Mei Hong Tan
    Dustin Pomerleau
    Elaine W. Chong
    Lyndell L. Lim
    R. C. Andrew Symons
    Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology, 2020, 258 : 653 - 661
  • [49] Stepwise segmentation error correction in optical coherence tomography angiography images of patients with diabetic macular edema
    Ghasemi Falavarjani, Khalil
    Mirshahi, Reza
    Ghasemizadeh, Shahriar
    Sardarinia, Mahsa
    THERAPEUTIC ADVANCES IN OPHTHALMOLOGY, 2020, 12
  • [50] Predicting optical coherence tomography-derived diabetic macular edema grades from fundus photographs using deep learning
    Varadarajan, Avinash V.
    Bavishi, Pinal
    Ruamviboonsuk, Paisan
    Chotcomwongse, Peranut
    Venugopalan, Subhashini
    Narayanaswamy, Arunachalam
    Cuadros, Jorge
    Kanai, Kuniyoshi
    Bresnick, George
    Tadarati, Mongkol
    Silpa-archa, Sukhum
    Limwattanayingyong, Jirawut
    Nganthavee, Variya
    Ledsam, Joseph R.
    Keane, Pearse A.
    Corrado, Greg S.
    Peng, Lily
    Webster, Dale R.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2020, 11 (01)