Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and efficient in the treatment of surgical biliary disease: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wiseman, James E. [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [2 ]
Oviedo, Rodolfo J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, 600 N Wolfe St Blalock 655, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, 1295 N Martin,Drachman Hall A232, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, 6550 Fannin St Suite 1501, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical education; Minimal ports; BILE-DUCT INJURY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01410-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have suggested that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is both feasible and safe. However, this approach has failed to gain acceptance outside of clinical trials, leaving adopters of this approach vulnerable to medico-legal scrutiny. We hypothesized that the three-port approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficient in experienced hands. All LC (including robotic) cases were performed on patients 18 years and older between November 2018 and March 2020. Operations utilizing three ports were compared to those performed using more than three ports. The primary outcomes measured were total operative time, conversion-to-open rate, and the complication rate. A two-sample test was performed to compare operative times, and a Fisher's exact test was used to compare conversion-to-open and complication rates. Linear regression models were used to account for the effect of confounders. 924 total LCs were performed by 30 surgeons in the study period (71 three-port, 853 four or more ports). The mean operative time was 10 min shorter in the three-port group in comparison (64.1 +/- 1.4 min vs. 74.4 +/- 1.8 min, p < 0.01), despite a threefold higher rate of intraoperative cholangiogram in these cases (23.0% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in either the conversion-to-open rate (1.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.35), or the overall complication rate (7.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.82). Operative time for LC performed through three ports was significantly less than those performed through the traditional four port approach, despite utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram nearly three times as often. There was no difference in the conversion-to open rate or complication rate. These results provide considerable evidence that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is comparable to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in operative duration, conversion-to-open rate, and complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Multicenter retrospective cohort Italian study on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the surgical residents
    Iossa, Angelo
    Micalizzi, Alessandra
    Giuffre, Mary
    Ciccioriccio, Maria Chiara
    Termine, Pietro
    De Angelis, Francesco
    Boru, Cristian Eugeniu
    Di Buono, Giuseppe
    Salzano, Antonio
    Chiozza, Matteo
    Agostini, Carlotta
    Silvestri, Vania
    Agrusa, Antonino
    Anania, Gabriele
    Bracale, Umberto
    Coratti, Francesco
    Cavallaro, Giuseppe
    Corcione, Francesco
    Morino, Mario
    Silecchia, Gianfranco
    LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2022, 408 (01)
  • [42] Single-port laparoscopic appendectomy using new surgical procedure versus conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy
    Liu, Fei
    Lv, Quan
    Wang, Chun-Yi
    Li, Zi-Wei
    Liu, Xu-Rui
    Peng, Dong
    UPDATES IN SURGERY, 2024, 76 (04) : 1347 - 1355
  • [43] A Retrospective Study on the Three-Port Technique of Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration for the Management of Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis
    Zhao, Chunlong
    Xu, Zipeng
    Hu, Weidong
    Ge, Chen
    Zhang, Zhengwei
    Dai, Zhengxing
    Zhang, Shuo
    Tang, Neng
    Wang, Weiguo
    Gu, Jiayu
    Chen, Chaobo
    He, Songbing
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GENERAL MEDICINE, 2023, 16 : 3435 - 3445
  • [44] The comparison of single incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and three port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: prospective randomized study
    Deveci, Ugur
    Barbaros, Umut
    Kapakli, Mahmut Sertan
    Manukyan, Manuk Norayk
    Simsek, Selcuk
    Kebudi, Abut
    Mercan, Selcuk
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2013, 85 (06): : 275 - 282
  • [45] Laparoscopic cholecystectomy in pregnancy: An Australian retrospective cohort study
    Paramanathan, Ashvin
    Walsh, Sam Zachary
    Zhou, Jieyun
    Chan, Steven
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 18 : 220 - 223
  • [46] Delay in treatment of biliary disease during pregnancy increases morbidity and can be avoided with safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Muench, J
    Albrink, M
    Serafini, F
    Rosemurgy, A
    Carey, L
    Murr, MM
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2001, 67 (06) : 539 - 542
  • [47] The Feasibility and Safety of a Three-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using a 2mm Mini-Instrument
    Kim, Kwan Woo
    Park, Jeong Ik
    Nam, So-Hyun
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (122) : 281 - 285
  • [48] RETROPERITONEAL LAPAROSCOPIC DISMEMBERED PYELOPLASTY USING A THREE-PORT TECHNIQUE: SURGICAL EXPERIENCE AND OUTCOMES
    Fishman, Andrew I.
    Green, David A.
    Rajamahanty, Srinivas
    Grasso, Michael
    JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2010, 183 (04): : E283 - E284
  • [49] Response to: Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy is Safe and Effective for the Treatment of Biliary Dyskinesia in the Pediatric Population
    Richmond, Bryan K.
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2010, 76 (12) : 1426 - 1426
  • [50] Comparing the surgical outcomes of dual-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy and three-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer
    Ahn, Hye Seong
    Chang, Mee Soo
    Han, Dong-Seok
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL TREATMENT AND RESEARCH, 2021, 100 (01) : 18 - 24