Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and efficient in the treatment of surgical biliary disease: a retrospective cohort study

被引:0
|
作者
Wiseman, James E. [1 ]
Hsu, Chiu-Hsieh [2 ]
Oviedo, Rodolfo J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Dept Surg, 600 N Wolfe St Blalock 655, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[2] Univ Arizona, Mel & Enid Zuckerman Coll Publ Hlth, 1295 N Martin,Drachman Hall A232, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[3] Houston Methodist Hosp, Dept Surg, 6550 Fannin St Suite 1501, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Surgical education; Minimal ports; BILE-DUCT INJURY;
D O I
10.1007/s11701-022-01410-z
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Multiple studies have suggested that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is both feasible and safe. However, this approach has failed to gain acceptance outside of clinical trials, leaving adopters of this approach vulnerable to medico-legal scrutiny. We hypothesized that the three-port approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is safe and efficient in experienced hands. All LC (including robotic) cases were performed on patients 18 years and older between November 2018 and March 2020. Operations utilizing three ports were compared to those performed using more than three ports. The primary outcomes measured were total operative time, conversion-to-open rate, and the complication rate. A two-sample test was performed to compare operative times, and a Fisher's exact test was used to compare conversion-to-open and complication rates. Linear regression models were used to account for the effect of confounders. 924 total LCs were performed by 30 surgeons in the study period (71 three-port, 853 four or more ports). The mean operative time was 10 min shorter in the three-port group in comparison (64.1 +/- 1.4 min vs. 74.4 +/- 1.8 min, p < 0.01), despite a threefold higher rate of intraoperative cholangiogram in these cases (23.0% vs. 7.9%, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in either the conversion-to-open rate (1.6% vs. 5.1%, p = 0.35), or the overall complication rate (7.1% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.82). Operative time for LC performed through three ports was significantly less than those performed through the traditional four port approach, despite utilizing intraoperative cholangiogram nearly three times as often. There was no difference in the conversion-to open rate or complication rate. These results provide considerable evidence that three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy is comparable to four-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy in operative duration, conversion-to-open rate, and complication rate.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 154
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A prospective, randomized, controlled, trial comparing occult-scar incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy and classic three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy
    Zhang, Lei
    Sah, Bijay
    Ma, Jing
    Shang, Changzhen
    Huang, Zejian
    Chen, Yajin
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (04): : 1131 - 1135
  • [32] Three-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy by harmonic dissection without cystic duct and artery clipping
    Tebala, Giovanni D.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2006, 191 (05): : 718 - 720
  • [33] Single-Port Access Cholecystectomy is a Safe Alternative to Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Comparison of Single-Port Access versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
    Cziupka, K.
    Partecke, L. I.
    Nass, C.
    Mirow, L.
    ZENTRALBLATT FUR CHIRURGIE, 2013, 138 (01): : 70 - 75
  • [34] Three-port versus four-port technique for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Nip, Lawrence
    Tong, Kin-Seng
    Borg, Cynthia M.
    BJS OPEN, 2022, 6 (02):
  • [35] Three-Port Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Shaoliang Sun
    Kehu Yang
    Mingtai Gao
    Xiaodong He
    Jinhui Tian
    Bin Ma
    World Journal of Surgery, 2009, 33 : 1904 - 1908
  • [36] Learning curve for the surgical time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees using the three-port method: how many cases are needed for stabilization?
    Masaru Komatsu
    Naoyuki Yokoyama
    Tomohiro Katada
    Daisuke Sato
    Tetsuya Otani
    Rina Harada
    Shiori Utsumi
    Motoharu Hirai
    Akira Kubota
    Hiroaki Uehara
    Surgical Endoscopy, 2023, 37 : 1252 - 1261
  • [37] Three-Port Versus Four-Port Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials
    Sun, Shaoliang
    Yang, Kehu
    Gao, Mingtai
    He, Xiaodong
    Tian, Jinhui
    Ma, Bin
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2009, 33 (09) : 1904 - 1908
  • [38] Learning curve for the surgical time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by surgical trainees using the three-port method: how many cases are needed for stabilization?
    Komatsu, Masaru
    Yokoyama, Naoyuki
    Katada, Tomohiro
    Sato, Daisuke
    Otani, Tetsuya
    Harada, Rina
    Utsumi, Shiori
    Hirai, Motoharu
    Kubota, Akira
    Uehara, Hiroaki
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2023, 37 (02): : 1252 - 1261
  • [39] Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Treatment of Biliary Dyskinesia Is Safe and Effective in the Pediatric Population
    Hofeldt, Matthew
    Richmond, Bryan
    Huffman, Kristy
    Nestor, Jennings
    Maxwell, Damian
    AMERICAN SURGEON, 2008, 74 (11) : 1069 - 1072
  • [40] Multicenter retrospective cohort Italian study on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed by the surgical residents
    Angelo Iossa
    Alessandra Micalizzi
    Mary Giuffrè
    Maria Chiara Ciccioriccio
    Pietro Termine
    Francesco De Angelis
    Cristian Eugeniu Boru
    Giuseppe Di Buono
    Antonio Salzano
    Matteo Chiozza
    Carlotta Agostini
    Vania Silvestri
    Antonino Agrusa
    Gabriele Anania
    Umberto Bracale
    Francesco Coratti
    Giuseppe Cavallaro
    Francesco Corcione
    Mario Morino
    Gianfranco Silecchia
    Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery, 408