Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception

被引:22
|
作者
Schilling, Achim [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Sedley, William [3 ]
Gerum, Richard [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Metzner, Claus [1 ]
Tziridis, Konstantin [1 ]
Maier, Andreas [6 ]
Schulze, Holger [1 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Friston, Karl J. [10 ]
Krauss, Patrick [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Neurosci Lab, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Cognit Computat Neurosci Grp, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, England
[4] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[5] York Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Pattern Recognit Lab, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hearing Res, Dept Anat & Neurobiol Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[9] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[10] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3AR, England
[11] Univ Hosp Erlangen, ENT Clin Head & Neck Surg, Waldstr 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
artificial intelligence; Bayesian brain; phantom perception; predictive coding; stochastic resonance; tinnitus; DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; GAP DETECTION DEFICITS; TINNITUS PITCH; HEARING-LOSS; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LATERAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL NETWORKS; CARTWHEEL CELLS; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awad255
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mechanistic insight is achieved only when experiments are employed to test formal or computational models. Furthermore, in analogy to lesion studies, phantom perception may serve as a vehicle to understand the fundamental processing principles underlying healthy auditory perception. With a special focus on tinnitus-as the prime example of auditory phantom perception-we review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience. In particular, we discuss why everyone with tinnitus suffers from (at least hidden) hearing loss, but not everyone with hearing loss suffers from tinnitus.We argue that intrinsic neural noise is generated and amplified along the auditory pathway as a compensatory mechanism to restore normal hearing based on adaptive stochastic resonance. The neural noise increase can then be misinterpreted as auditory input and perceived as tinnitus. This mechanism can be formalized in the Bayesian brain framework, where the percept (posterior) assimilates a prior prediction (brain's expectations) and likelihood (bottom-up neural signal). A higher mean and lower variance (i.e. enhanced precision) of the likelihood shifts the posterior, evincing a misinterpretation of sensory evidence, which may be further confounded by plastic changes in the brain that underwrite prior predictions. Hence, two fundamental processing principles provide the most explanatory power for the emergence of auditory phantom perceptions: predictive coding as a top-down and adaptive stochastic resonance as a complementary bottom-up mechanism.We conclude that both principles also play a crucial role in healthy auditory perception. Finally, in the context of neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence, both processing principles may serve to improve contemporary machine learning techniques. How is information processed in the brain during auditory phantom perception? Schilling et al. review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience and bring together disparate frameworks-stochastic resonance and predictive coding-to offer an explanation for the emergence of tinnitus.
引用
收藏
页码:4809 / 4825
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] The stochastic resonance model of auditory perception: A unified explanation of tinnitus development, Zwicker tone illusion, and residual inhibition
    Schilling, Achim
    Tziridis, Konstantin
    Schulze, Holger
    Krauss, Patrick
    TINNITUS - AN INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH TOWARDS INDIVIDUALIZED TREATMENT: TOWARDS UNDERSTANDING THE COMPLEXITY OF TINNITUS, 2021, 262 : 139 - 157
  • [42] Predictive coding of visual-auditory and motor-auditory events: An electrophysiological study
    Stekelenburg, Jeroen J.
    Vroomen, Jean
    BRAIN RESEARCH, 2015, 1626 : 88 - 96
  • [43] A Predictive Coding Model for Evoked and Spontaneous Pain Perception
    Song, Yuru
    Kemprecos, Helen
    Wang, Jing
    Chen, Zhe
    2019 41ST ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE OF THE IEEE ENGINEERING IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY SOCIETY (EMBC), 2019, : 2964 - 2967
  • [44] Interpersonal predictive coding, not action perception, is impaired in autism
    von der Luehe, T.
    Manera, V.
    Barisic, I.
    Becchio, C.
    Vogeley, K.
    Schilbach, L.
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2016, 371 (1693)
  • [45] Direct social perception, mindreading and Bayesian predictive coding
    de Bruin, Leon
    Strijbos, Derek
    CONSCIOUSNESS AND COGNITION, 2015, 36 : 565 - 570
  • [46] A Hybrid Coding Strategy to Improve Auditory Perception of Cochlear Implant
    Sun, Baoyin
    Zhang, Xiaojun
    Wang, Yan
    Wu, Di
    Xiao, Zhongzhe
    Tao, Zhi
    2018 5TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS AND INFORMATICS (ICSAI), 2018, : 845 - 850
  • [47] Repetition effects to sounds: evidence for predictive coding in the auditory system
    Baldeweg, T
    TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (03) : 93 - 94
  • [48] Spatiotemporal brain hierarchies of auditory memory recognition and predictive coding
    Bonetti, L.
    Fernandez-Rubio, G.
    Carlomagno, F.
    Dietz, M.
    Pantazis, D.
    Vuust, P.
    Kringelbach, M. L.
    NATURE COMMUNICATIONS, 2024, 15 (01)
  • [49] THE PARAMAGENTIC RESONANCE - PRINCIPLES AND FUNDAMENTAL PARAMETERS IN POWDER SPECTRA
    CHE, M
    TAARIT, YB
    ADVANCES IN COLLOID AND INTERFACE SCIENCE, 1985, 23 (1-4) : 179 - 213
  • [50] Auditory perception and functional magnetic resonance imaging - fMRI
    Belin, P
    Zatorre, RJ
    REVUE DE NEUROPSYCHOLOGIE, 2000, 10 (04): : 603 - 621