Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception

被引:22
|
作者
Schilling, Achim [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Sedley, William [3 ]
Gerum, Richard [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Metzner, Claus [1 ]
Tziridis, Konstantin [1 ]
Maier, Andreas [6 ]
Schulze, Holger [1 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Friston, Karl J. [10 ]
Krauss, Patrick [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Neurosci Lab, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Cognit Computat Neurosci Grp, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, England
[4] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[5] York Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Pattern Recognit Lab, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hearing Res, Dept Anat & Neurobiol Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[9] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[10] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3AR, England
[11] Univ Hosp Erlangen, ENT Clin Head & Neck Surg, Waldstr 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
artificial intelligence; Bayesian brain; phantom perception; predictive coding; stochastic resonance; tinnitus; DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; GAP DETECTION DEFICITS; TINNITUS PITCH; HEARING-LOSS; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LATERAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL NETWORKS; CARTWHEEL CELLS; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awad255
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mechanistic insight is achieved only when experiments are employed to test formal or computational models. Furthermore, in analogy to lesion studies, phantom perception may serve as a vehicle to understand the fundamental processing principles underlying healthy auditory perception. With a special focus on tinnitus-as the prime example of auditory phantom perception-we review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience. In particular, we discuss why everyone with tinnitus suffers from (at least hidden) hearing loss, but not everyone with hearing loss suffers from tinnitus.We argue that intrinsic neural noise is generated and amplified along the auditory pathway as a compensatory mechanism to restore normal hearing based on adaptive stochastic resonance. The neural noise increase can then be misinterpreted as auditory input and perceived as tinnitus. This mechanism can be formalized in the Bayesian brain framework, where the percept (posterior) assimilates a prior prediction (brain's expectations) and likelihood (bottom-up neural signal). A higher mean and lower variance (i.e. enhanced precision) of the likelihood shifts the posterior, evincing a misinterpretation of sensory evidence, which may be further confounded by plastic changes in the brain that underwrite prior predictions. Hence, two fundamental processing principles provide the most explanatory power for the emergence of auditory phantom perceptions: predictive coding as a top-down and adaptive stochastic resonance as a complementary bottom-up mechanism.We conclude that both principles also play a crucial role in healthy auditory perception. Finally, in the context of neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence, both processing principles may serve to improve contemporary machine learning techniques. How is information processed in the brain during auditory phantom perception? Schilling et al. review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience and bring together disparate frameworks-stochastic resonance and predictive coding-to offer an explanation for the emergence of tinnitus.
引用
收藏
页码:4809 / 4825
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Stochastic resonance in a fundamental quantum system
    Wellens, T
    Buchleitner, A
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS A-MATHEMATICAL AND GENERAL, 1999, 32 (15): : 2895 - 2919
  • [22] EVALUATING THE LOUDNESS OF PHANTOM AUDITORY-PERCEPTION (TINNITUS) IN RATS
    JASTREBOFF, PJ
    BRENNAN, JF
    AUDIOLOGY, 1994, 33 (04): : 202 - 217
  • [23] Fundamental deficits of auditory perception in Wernicke's aphasia
    Robson, Holly
    Grube, Manon
    Ralph, Matthew A. Lambon
    Griffiths, Timothy D.
    Sage, Karen
    CORTEX, 2013, 49 (07) : 1808 - 1822
  • [24] Predictive Uncertainty Underlies Auditory Boundary Perception
    Hansen, Niels Chr
    Kragness, Haley E.
    Vuust, Peter
    Trainor, Laurel
    Pearce, Marcus T.
    PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2021, 32 (09) : 1416 - 1425
  • [25] An Auditory Phantom Percept That Does Not Impair External Sound Perception
    Clayton, Kameron K.
    Koops, Elouise A.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 41 (08): : 1622 - 1624
  • [26] PREDICTIVE VALIDITY OF TEST OF AUDITORY-PERCEPTION
    SCHMIDT, CR
    SABATINO, DA
    FOSTER, GG
    EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1975, 35 (04) : 1023 - 1027
  • [27] The neural correlates of subjectively perceived and passively matched loudness perception in auditory phantom perception
    De Ridder, Dirk
    Congedo, Marco
    Vanneste, Sven
    BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR, 2015, 5 (05):
  • [28] Neurobiological Signatures of Auditory False Perception and Phantom Perception as a Consequence of Sensory Prediction Errors
    Ahn, Min-Hee
    Alsabbagh, Nour
    Lee, Hyo-Jeong
    Kim, Hyung-Jong
    Jung, Myung-Hun
    Hong, Sung-Kwang
    BIOLOGY-BASEL, 2022, 11 (10):
  • [29] Visual coding for action violates fundamental psychophysical principles
    Ganel, Tzvi
    Chajut, Eran
    Algom, Daniel
    CURRENT BIOLOGY, 2008, 18 (14) : R599 - R601
  • [30] PREDICTIVE SPEECH CODING USING STOCHASTIC EXCITATIONS
    REININGER, H
    SIEBERT, P
    AEU-ARCHIV FUR ELEKTRONIK UND UBERTRAGUNGSTECHNIK-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ELECTRONICS AND COMMUNICATIONS, 1989, 43 (05): : 307 - 312