Predictive coding and stochastic resonance as fundamental principles of auditory phantom perception

被引:22
|
作者
Schilling, Achim [1 ,2 ,11 ]
Sedley, William [3 ]
Gerum, Richard [2 ,4 ,5 ]
Metzner, Claus [1 ]
Tziridis, Konstantin [1 ]
Maier, Andreas [6 ]
Schulze, Holger [1 ]
Zeng, Fan-Gang [7 ,8 ,9 ]
Friston, Karl J. [10 ]
Krauss, Patrick [1 ,2 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Erlangen, Neurosci Lab, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
[2] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Cognit Computat Neurosci Grp, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[3] Newcastle Univ, Translat & Clin Res Inst, Sch Med, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, England
[4] York Univ, Ctr Vis Res, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[5] York Univ, Dept Phys & Astron, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
[6] Univ Erlangen Nurnberg, Pattern Recognit Lab, D-91058 Erlangen, Germany
[7] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Hearing Res, Dept Anat & Neurobiol Biomed Engn, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[8] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Otolaryngol Head & Neck Surg, Irvine, CA 92697 USA
[9] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Cognit Sci, Irvine, CA USA
[10] UCL, Inst Neurol, Wellcome Ctr Human Neuroimaging, London WC1N 3AR, England
[11] Univ Hosp Erlangen, ENT Clin Head & Neck Surg, Waldstr 1, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany
关键词
artificial intelligence; Bayesian brain; phantom perception; predictive coding; stochastic resonance; tinnitus; DORSAL COCHLEAR NUCLEUS; GAP DETECTION DEFICITS; TINNITUS PITCH; HEARING-LOSS; HOMEOSTATIC PLASTICITY; COMPUTATIONAL MODEL; LATERAL INHIBITION; NEURONAL NETWORKS; CARTWHEEL CELLS; NEURAL-NETWORKS;
D O I
10.1093/brain/awad255
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Mechanistic insight is achieved only when experiments are employed to test formal or computational models. Furthermore, in analogy to lesion studies, phantom perception may serve as a vehicle to understand the fundamental processing principles underlying healthy auditory perception. With a special focus on tinnitus-as the prime example of auditory phantom perception-we review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience. In particular, we discuss why everyone with tinnitus suffers from (at least hidden) hearing loss, but not everyone with hearing loss suffers from tinnitus.We argue that intrinsic neural noise is generated and amplified along the auditory pathway as a compensatory mechanism to restore normal hearing based on adaptive stochastic resonance. The neural noise increase can then be misinterpreted as auditory input and perceived as tinnitus. This mechanism can be formalized in the Bayesian brain framework, where the percept (posterior) assimilates a prior prediction (brain's expectations) and likelihood (bottom-up neural signal). A higher mean and lower variance (i.e. enhanced precision) of the likelihood shifts the posterior, evincing a misinterpretation of sensory evidence, which may be further confounded by plastic changes in the brain that underwrite prior predictions. Hence, two fundamental processing principles provide the most explanatory power for the emergence of auditory phantom perceptions: predictive coding as a top-down and adaptive stochastic resonance as a complementary bottom-up mechanism.We conclude that both principles also play a crucial role in healthy auditory perception. Finally, in the context of neuroscience-inspired artificial intelligence, both processing principles may serve to improve contemporary machine learning techniques. How is information processed in the brain during auditory phantom perception? Schilling et al. review recent work at the intersection of artificial intelligence, psychology and neuroscience and bring together disparate frameworks-stochastic resonance and predictive coding-to offer an explanation for the emergence of tinnitus.
引用
收藏
页码:4809 / 4825
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Predisposition to domain-wide maladaptive changes in predictive coding in auditory phantom perception
    Mohan, Anusha
    Luckey, Alison
    Weisz, Nathan
    Vanneste, Sven
    NEUROIMAGE, 2022, 248
  • [2] Stochastic resonance in the auditory waveform coding.
    Bibikov, NG
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 : 412 - 412
  • [3] Predictive coding in auditory perception: challenges and unresolved questions
    Denham, Susan L.
    Winkler, Istvan
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 51 (05) : 1151 - 1160
  • [4] The neural code of auditory phantom perception
    Weisz, Nathan
    Mueller, Simona
    Schlee, Winfried
    Dohrmann, Katalin
    Hartmann, Thomas
    Elbert, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2007, 27 (06): : 1479 - 1484
  • [5] Ghost stochastic resonance as a mechanism for the missing fundamental illusion and the perception of pitch
    Chialvo, DR
    FASEB JOURNAL, 2003, 17 (04): : A555 - A555
  • [6] Electrophysiological correlates of predictive coding of auditory location in the perception of natural audiovisual events
    Stekelenburg, Jeroen J.
    Vroomen, Jean
    FRONTIERS IN INTEGRATIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2012, 6
  • [7] PHANTOM AUDITORY-PERCEPTION (TINNITUS) - MECHANISMS OF GENERATION AND PERCEPTION
    JASTREBOFF, PJ
    NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH, 1990, 8 (04) : 221 - 254
  • [8] Editorial: Auditory perception and phantom perception in brains, minds and machines
    Schilling, Achim
    Schaette, Roland
    Sedley, William
    Gerum, Richard Carl
    Maier, Andreas
    Krauss, Patrick
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE, 2023, 17
  • [9] Efficient coding in human auditory perception
    Ming, Vivienne L.
    Holt, Lori L.
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2009, 126 (03): : 1312 - 1320
  • [10] AUDITORY INTENSITY PERCEPTION AND NEURAL CODING
    CAMPBELL, RA
    JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1966, 39 (06): : 1030 - &