Co-Production Journey to Wellness Guide

被引:2
|
作者
Swarbrick, Margaret [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Kuebler, Corey [5 ]
Treitler, Peter [3 ,4 ]
Estes, Arielle [5 ]
Digioia-Laird, Vincent [5 ]
Moosvi, Karen [6 ]
Nemec, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Ctr Alcohol & Subst Use Studies, Grad Sch Appl & Profess Psychol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[2] Collaborat Support Programs New Jersey, Freehold, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers Univ Behav Hlth Care, Piscataway, NJ USA
[6] Healing & Hlth Solut LLC, Colts Neck, NJ USA
[7] Collaborat Support Programs New Jersey, 11 Spring St, Freehold, NJ 07728 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3928/02793695-20230321-02
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
As rates of substance use and mental disorders continue to rise, individuals with mental health and substance use challenges and their supporters could benefit from practical, accessible, cost-effective, wellness-focused tools outlining simple daily strategies to promote long-term recovery. The current article describes such a tool, the Journey to Wellness Guide, based on the Wellness Model, and developed through a co-production process. Co-production refers to a process of research, service design, and educational materials development where people with lived experience of mental health and/or substance use challenges share decision-making power throughout all stages of production, including the sharing of results. The co-production process resulted in a well-received wellness tool and tip guides for personal use, supporting others, and use in a group context. The value of this tool for psychosocial nursing and behavioral health care worker self-care and practice is outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Co-production and involuntary psychiatric settings
    Pilgrim, David
    MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2018, 23 (04) : 269 - 279
  • [42] Negotiating space for knowledge co-production
    Verwoerd, Lisa
    Brouwers, Hilde
    Kunseler, Eva
    Regeer, Barbara
    de Hoop, Evelien
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2023, 50 (01) : 59 - 71
  • [43] CO-PRODUCTION IN SELF-MANAGEMENT
    Walumbe, J.
    HAEMOPHILIA, 2022, 28 : 15 - 15
  • [44] Shore up research co-production
    Kernecker, Maria
    Busse, Maria
    Zscheischler, Jana
    NATURE, 2019, 573 (7775) : 495 - 495
  • [45] Co-production in mental health care
    Clark, Michael
    MENTAL HEALTH REVIEW JOURNAL, 2015, 20 (04) : 213 - 219
  • [46] Co-production: towards a utopian approach
    Bell, David M.
    Pahl, Kate
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2018, 21 (01) : 105 - 117
  • [47] The co-production of knowledge for climate science
    Miner, Kimberley
    Canavera, Leslie
    Gonet, Jared
    Luis, Kelly
    Maddox, Marisol
    McCarney, Paul
    Bridge, Gwen
    Schimel, David
    Rattlingleaf, James
    NATURE CLIMATE CHANGE, 2023, 13 (04) : 307 - 308
  • [48] Ammonia/methanol co-production plant
    Abu Bakar, SO
    Niwa, K
    Bakkerud, PK
    AMMONIA PLANT SAFETY & RELATED FACILITIES, VOL 40, 2000, 40 : 292 - 299
  • [49] Development geography I: Co-production
    Vincent, Katharine
    PROGRESS IN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY, 2022, 46 (03) : 890 - 897
  • [50] CLASSROOM CO-PRODUCTION OF A LEADERSHIP MODEL
    Gurbutt, R.
    Gurbutt, D.
    Boland, A.
    INTED2017: 11TH INTERNATIONAL TECHNOLOGY, EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE, 2017, : 3110 - 3116