Co-Production Journey to Wellness Guide

被引:2
|
作者
Swarbrick, Margaret [1 ,2 ,7 ]
Kuebler, Corey [5 ]
Treitler, Peter [3 ,4 ]
Estes, Arielle [5 ]
Digioia-Laird, Vincent [5 ]
Moosvi, Karen [6 ]
Nemec, Patricia [1 ]
机构
[1] Rutgers Ctr Alcohol & Subst Use Studies, Grad Sch Appl & Profess Psychol, Piscataway, NJ USA
[2] Collaborat Support Programs New Jersey, Freehold, NJ USA
[3] Rutgers State Univ, Inst Hlth Hlth Care Policy & Aging Res, Ctr Hlth Serv Res, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[4] Rutgers State Univ, Sch Social Work, New Brunswick, NJ USA
[5] Rutgers Univ Behav Hlth Care, Piscataway, NJ USA
[6] Healing & Hlth Solut LLC, Colts Neck, NJ USA
[7] Collaborat Support Programs New Jersey, 11 Spring St, Freehold, NJ 07728 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3928/02793695-20230321-02
中图分类号
R47 [护理学];
学科分类号
1011 ;
摘要
As rates of substance use and mental disorders continue to rise, individuals with mental health and substance use challenges and their supporters could benefit from practical, accessible, cost-effective, wellness-focused tools outlining simple daily strategies to promote long-term recovery. The current article describes such a tool, the Journey to Wellness Guide, based on the Wellness Model, and developed through a co-production process. Co-production refers to a process of research, service design, and educational materials development where people with lived experience of mental health and/or substance use challenges share decision-making power throughout all stages of production, including the sharing of results. The co-production process resulted in a well-received wellness tool and tip guides for personal use, supporting others, and use in a group context. The value of this tool for psychosocial nursing and behavioral health care worker self-care and practice is outlined.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / +
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] How Co-Production Regulates
    Innes, Martin
    Davies, Bethan
    McDermont, Morag
    SOCIAL & LEGAL STUDIES, 2019, 28 (03) : 370 - 391
  • [22] Is commissioning the enemy of co-production?
    Hart, Farrah
    PERSPECTIVES IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 142 (04) : 191 - 192
  • [23] Co-production of industrial services
    Austerjost M.
    Kreyenborg A.
    Kiklhorn D.
    Azkan C.
    Graefenstein J.
    Hefft D.
    Henke M.
    1600, Walter de Gruyter GmbH (116): : 153 - 156
  • [24] Co-production of knowledge: the future
    Redman, S.
    Greenhalgh, T.
    Adedokun, L.
    Staniszewska, S.
    Denegri, S.
    BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2021, 372
  • [25] The cruel optimism of co-production
    Kill, Cassie
    QUALITATIVE RESEARCH JOURNAL, 2022, 22 (01) : 56 - 66
  • [26] CO-PRODUCTION IN A MAORI CONTEXT
    McKenzie, Donna
    Whiu, Te Atarangi
    Matahaere-Atariki, Donna
    Goldsmith, Keryn
    Kokiri, Te Puni
    SOCIAL POLICY JOURNAL OF NEW ZEALAND, 2008, (33): : 32 - 46
  • [27] After the Initial Start of Co-Production: A Narrative Review of the Development of Co-Production and Changes in Orientation
    Bos, Hessel
    Zwaan, Pieter
    Brandsen, Taco
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2025, 17 (03)
  • [28] The limits of co-production: linking regulatory capacity to co-production of authoritative knowledge for environmental policy
    Large, Daniel
    SCIENCE AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2024,
  • [29] Conceptualisation of co-creation and co-production
    Egilstrod, B.
    Wegener, C.
    Henriksen, L. S.
    Petersen, K. S.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2023, 33
  • [30] Customer readiness to co-production of mobile banking services: a customer-only co-production perspective
    Andrews A. Yalley
    Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2022, 27 : 81 - 95