The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students

被引:0
|
作者
Ju, Changting [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Ning [3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Xu [4 ]
Xue, Jinfeng [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 152 Luoyu St, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Anyang Inst Technol, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Anyang Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol Studies Educ, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Sch Nursing, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Mindful Self-Care Scale; MSCS; Brief-MSCS; Chinese college students; Validity; Reliability; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; POSITIVE BODY-IMAGE; EATING-DISORDERS; COMPASSION; TRANSLATION; PREVENTION; STIGMA; STRESS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMindful self-care is a way of embodied self-regulation that can safeguard and enhance psychological well-being. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among college students.MethodA total of 1486 college students (Mage = 19.36, SD = 1.16) from four different universities participated in this study. All participants completed a series of online surveys, including the MSCS, the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the MSCS, and the R package measureQ was utilized to calculate the reliability. Additionally, we conducted comparative analyses involving the MSCS (33 items), its brief version (Brief-MSCS, 24 items), and previous relevant research.ResultsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS demonstrated an acceptable factor structure, while the Brief-MSCS exhibited a more robust structure. Notably, the bifactor model adequately fitted the data for both versions. In bifactor model, each item not only belonged to its own group of factors but also belonged to a general factor. Both versions displayed satisfactory convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and robust composite reliability. Furthermore, Chinese college students exhibited a higher level of mindful self-care than Chinese medical professionals and a Western community sample.ConclusionsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS have been found to be reliable and valid tools for assessing the levels of mindful self-care among college students, with the brief version showing superior performance. The robust fit of the bifactor model suggests that there is an overarching structure of mindful self-care that can be used to assess an individual's level through the total score. Moreover, there are differences in the level of mindful self-care among different groups, which need further verification.PreregistrationThis study is not preregistered.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 630
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE PERFECTIONISM SCALE AMONG CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTS
    Zhou, Xueting
    Wu, Siyao
    Zhu, Hong
    Cai, Taisheng
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2016, 44 (05): : 727 - 736
  • [42] THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE REVISED CHINESE VERSION OF THE SITUATIONAL SELF-AWARENESS SCALE
    Liu, Xu-Feng
    Shao, Yong-Cong
    Yang, Ye-Bing
    Wu, Sheng-Jun
    Yang, Hai
    Wang, Wei
    Xiao, Wei
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2009, 37 (06): : 743 - 752
  • [43] A Chinese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale: Reliability and validity assessment
    Xu, Jing
    Zhouchen, Yi-Bei
    Wang, Rong
    Redding, Sharon R.
    Fu, Dou
    Ouyang, Yan-Qiong
    HELIYON, 2024, 10 (09)
  • [44] RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE CHINESE VERSION OF THE PERSONALITY DIAGNOSTIC QUESTIONNAIRE-4+: A STUDY WITH CHINESE COLLEGE STUDENTS
    Ling, Hui
    Qian, Ming-yi
    Yang, Bing-jun
    SOCIAL BEHAVIOR AND PERSONALITY, 2010, 38 (03): : 311 - 320
  • [45] Validity and Reliability of the Caregiver Contribution to Self-Care of Heart Failure Index Version 2
    Vellone, Ercole
    Barbaranelli, Claudio
    Pucciarelli, Gianluca
    Zeffiro, Valentina
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    Riegel, Barbara
    JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR NURSING, 2020, 35 (03) : 280 - 290
  • [46] Validity and Reliability of the Korean Version of the Self-Care of Diabetes Inventory (SCODI-K)
    Kong, Seung-Yeon
    Cho, Mi-Kyoung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (22)
  • [47] Validity and Reliability of the Self-Care of Chronic Illness Inventory and Self-Care Self-Efficacy Scale in Patients Living With Cancer
    Di Nitto, Marco
    Durante, Angela
    Torino, Francesco
    Bolgeo, Tatiana
    Damico, Vincenzo
    Ghizzardi, Greta
    Zerulo, Sipontina Rita
    Alvaro, Rosaria
    Vellone, Ercole
    Biagioli, Valentina
    JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2025,
  • [48] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the self-directed learning instrument in Chinese nursing students
    Gao, Ziyun
    Zhang, Lin
    Ma, Jianing
    Sun, Hong
    Hu, Mengya
    Wang, Meiding
    Liu, Haiyang
    Guo, Leilei
    BMC NURSING, 2023, 22 (01)
  • [49] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the self-directed learning instrument in Chinese nursing students
    Ziyun Gao
    Lin Zhang
    Jianing Ma
    Hong Sun
    Mengya Hu
    Meiding Wang
    Haiyang Liu
    Leilei Guo
    BMC Nursing, 22
  • [50] Validity and reliability of the left ventricular assist device self-care behaviour scale
    Kato, Naoko P.
    Melnikov, Semyon
    Denfeld, Quin E.
    Casida, Jesus
    Stromberg, Anna
    Ben-Gal, Tuvia
    Lee, Christopher S.
    Jaarsma, Tiny
    PLOS ONE, 2023, 18 (02):