The Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale for College Students

被引:0
|
作者
Ju, Changting [1 ,2 ]
Mo, Ning [3 ]
Zhang, Wei [1 ]
Jiang, Xu [4 ]
Xue, Jinfeng [1 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, 152 Luoyu St, Wuhan 430079, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Anyang Inst Technol, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[3] Anyang Univ, Mental Hlth Educ Ctr, Zhumadian, Henan, Peoples R China
[4] Temple Univ, Dept Psychol Studies Educ, 1301 Cecil B Moore Ave, Philadelphia, PA 19122 USA
[5] Hunan Univ Chinese Med, Sch Nursing, Changsha, Hunan, Peoples R China
关键词
Mindful Self-Care Scale; MSCS; Brief-MSCS; Chinese college students; Validity; Reliability; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS; POSITIVE BODY-IMAGE; EATING-DISORDERS; COMPASSION; TRANSLATION; PREVENTION; STIGMA; STRESS; LIFE;
D O I
10.1007/s12671-024-02308-7
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
ObjectivesMindful self-care is a way of embodied self-regulation that can safeguard and enhance psychological well-being. This study aimed to test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Mindful Self-Care Scale (MSCS) among college students.MethodA total of 1486 college students (Mage = 19.36, SD = 1.16) from four different universities participated in this study. All participants completed a series of online surveys, including the MSCS, the Self-Compassion Scale-Short Form, the Body Appreciation Scale-2, and the Satisfaction With Life Scale. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate the validity of the MSCS, and the R package measureQ was utilized to calculate the reliability. Additionally, we conducted comparative analyses involving the MSCS (33 items), its brief version (Brief-MSCS, 24 items), and previous relevant research.ResultsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS demonstrated an acceptable factor structure, while the Brief-MSCS exhibited a more robust structure. Notably, the bifactor model adequately fitted the data for both versions. In bifactor model, each item not only belonged to its own group of factors but also belonged to a general factor. Both versions displayed satisfactory convergent validity, discriminant validity, concurrent validity, and robust composite reliability. Furthermore, Chinese college students exhibited a higher level of mindful self-care than Chinese medical professionals and a Western community sample.ConclusionsThe MSCS and Brief-MSCS have been found to be reliable and valid tools for assessing the levels of mindful self-care among college students, with the brief version showing superior performance. The robust fit of the bifactor model suggests that there is an overarching structure of mindful self-care that can be used to assess an individual's level through the total score. Moreover, there are differences in the level of mindful self-care among different groups, which need further verification.PreregistrationThis study is not preregistered.
引用
收藏
页码:616 / 630
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Metacognitions about Health Questionnaire in college students
    Lisha Dai
    Robin Bailey
    Yunlong Deng
    Quality of Life Research, 2018, 27 : 1099 - 1108
  • [22] Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of Advance Care Planning Self-efficacy Scale for Physicians
    Zhou, Yanan
    Bai, Zhiling
    Cheng, Lin
    Zheng, Qin
    Li, Li
    JOURNAL OF PALLIATIVE CARE, 2024, 39 (01) : 36 - 46
  • [23] Reliability and validity evaluation of the stigma of loneliness scale in Chinese college students
    Fan, Zhiguang
    Shi, Xiaoli
    Yang, Shuhan
    Sun, Yueliang
    Chen, Ri
    BMC PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01)
  • [24] Reliability and validity evaluation of the stigma of loneliness scale in Chinese college students
    Zhiguang Fan
    Xiaoli Shi
    Shuhan Yang
    Yueliang Sun
    Ri Chen
    BMC Public Health, 24
  • [25] Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Self-care of Hypertension Inventory Version 3.0 in adults with hypertension
    Durukan, Beyza Nur
    Sener, Yusuf Ziya
    Erkoc, Aysegul
    Calik-Kutukcu, Ebru
    Guven, Alper Tuna
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR NURSING, 2024, 42 (02) : 131 - 137
  • [26] The validity and reliability of a Spanish version of the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities questionnaire
    Vincent, Deborah
    McEwen, Marylyn M.
    Pasvogel, Alice
    NURSING RESEARCH, 2008, 57 (02) : 101 - 106
  • [27] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Urinary Catheter Self-Care Management Questionnaire
    Soydas, Duygu
    Findik, Uemmue Yildiz
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGICAL NURSING, 2023, 17 (03) : 258 - 271
  • [28] Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Self-Care of Coronary Heart Disease Inventory
    Bayrak, Betul
    Oguz, Sidika
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NURSING PRACTICE, 2021, 27 (01)
  • [29] Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Worry Scale
    Shiu, ATY
    Wong, RYM
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2004, 21 (03) : 257 - 265
  • [30] Validity and Reliability of a Scale for Rating Self-care in Persons with Heart Failure
    de los Angeles Rodriguez-Gazquez, Maria
    Arredondo-Holguin, Edith
    AQUICHAN, 2012, 12 (01): : 22 - 31