Validation of the spectral reconstruction of an electron beam by comparison with spectrum from Monte Carlo

被引:0
|
作者
Wilches-Visbal, Jorge H. [1 ]
Apaza-Veliz, Danny G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Magdalena, Fac Ciencias Salud, Santa Marta, Colombia
来源
INGENIERIA Y COMPETITIVIDAD | 2023年 / 25卷 / 01期
关键词
Depth dose percentage; dose profile; reverse reconstruction; Monte Carlo validation; gamma index; STOPPING-POWER RATIOS; ENERGY-SPECTRUM; PHOTON;
D O I
10.25100/iyc.v24i1.112051
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Inverse reconstruction, one of the ways of calculating the energy spectrum of the central axis, has shown good results in various studies. Its validation, in the absence of the real spectrum and practicality, is usually done by comparing the PDP measured in the clinic, using the gamma index. The objective of the work is to validate the spectral reconstruction of a 6MeV electron beam from a Sinergy linear accelerator, by comparison with the spectrum derived from the Monte Carlo simulation of the accelerator head, as well as to carry out an analysis of its relationship with the validation by means of the clinically accepted gamma index criterion (>95% within 3% dose difference/3 mm in distance to agreement). The inverse reconstruction used Tikhonov regularization and generalized simulated annealing. Excellent agreement was observed between the PDP and the reconstructed dose profile (obtained from the reconstructed spectrum) and the measured and simulated PDPs (from the head simulation spectrum), as passage was >95% within of 1%/1mm and 2%/2mm for the PDPs and the dose profile, respectively. The simulated and reconstructed spectra presented similar shapes, coinciding in most probable energy and much of the low energy region. Despite serious discrepancies in the peak region, this was not reflected in clinically observable differences. In conclusion, it was verified that the reconstructed spectrum is close to one simulated by Monte Carlo, making it appropriate for clinical and research use.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of Monte Carlo and pencil beam electron planning algorithms
    Perrett, T
    Gray, K
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2003, 68 : S92 - S92
  • [2] Validation of a virtual electron beam head model for Monte Carlo dose calculation
    Sikora, M
    Dohm, O
    Mika, S
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2005, 76 : S94 - S94
  • [3] Comparison of Electron Monte Carlo and Pencil-Beam Algorithms in Clinical Electron Beam Radiation Dosimetry
    Liu, Z.
    Hargrove, I.
    Tazi, A.
    Barrett, J.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2013, 40 (06)
  • [4] MONTE CARLO ANALYSIS OF THE NEO BEAM ELECTRON BEAM FACILITY
    Messenger, S. R.
    Warner, J. H.
    Trautz, K.
    Uribe, R.
    Walters, R. J.
    35TH IEEE PHOTOVOLTAIC SPECIALISTS CONFERENCE, 2010,
  • [5] COMPARISON OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL MONTE CARLO SIMULATION AND THE PENCIL BEAM ALGORITHM FOR AN ELECTRON BEAM FROM A LINEAR ACCELERATOR.
    Manfredotti, C.
    Nastasi, U.
    Ragona, R.
    Anglesio, S.
    Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research, 1985, A255 (1-2): : 355 - 359
  • [6] Electron fields in clinical use - a comparison of the pencil beam method and Monte Carlo code
    Treutwein, M.
    Bogner, L.
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2006, 182 : 100 - 100
  • [7] COMPARISON OF ONETRAN CALCULATIONS OF ELECTRON BEAM DOSE PROFILES WITH MONTE CARLO AND EXPERIMENT.
    Garth, J.C.
    Woolf, S.
    IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 1987, NS-34 (06)
  • [8] Electron fields in clinical application. A comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithm
    Treutwein, Marius
    Bogner, Ludwig
    STRAHLENTHERAPIE UND ONKOLOGIE, 2007, 183 (08) : 454 - 458
  • [9] Validation of Monte Carlo Electron Dose Calculation in RayStation
    Yang, K.
    Chen, H.
    Mourtada, F.
    MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 46 (06) : E261 - E261
  • [10] Improved Monte Carlo clinical electron beam modelling
    Sachse, K. N.
    du Plessis, F. C. P.
    PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2019, 66 : 36 - 44