Improved Prediction of Surgical-Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery Using Machine Learning

被引:11
|
作者
Chen, Kevin A. [1 ]
Joisa, Chinmaya U. [2 ]
Stem, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Guillem, Jose G. [1 ]
Gomez, Shawn M. [2 ]
Kapadia, Muneera R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, 100 Manning Dr,Burnett Womack Bldg,Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Colorectal surgery; Machine learning; Surgical-site infection; RISK CALCULATOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002559
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection is a source of significant morbidity after colorectal surgery. Previous efforts to develop models that predict surgical-site infection have had limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in predicting postoperative outcomes by identifying nonlinear patterns within large data sets.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to seek usage of machine learning to develop a more accurate predictive model for colorectal surgical-site infections.DESIGN: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database from years 2012 to 2019 and were split into training, validation, and test sets. Machine-learning techniques included random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. A logistic regression model was also created. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.SETTINGS: A national, multicenter data set.PATIENTS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome (surgical-site infection) included patients who experienced superficial, deep, or organ-space surgical-site infections.RESULTS: The data set included 275,152 patients after the application of exclusion criteria. Of all patients, 10.7% experienced a surgical-site infection. Artificial neural network showed the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.769 (95% CI, 0.762-0.777), compared with 0.766 (95% CI, 0.759-0.774) for gradient boosting, 0.764 (95% CI, 0.756-0.772) for random forest, and 0.677 (95% CI, 0.669-0.685) for logistic regression. For the artificial neural network model, the strongest predictors of surgical-site infection were organ-space surgical-site infection present at time of surgery, operative time, oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and surgical approach.LIMITATIONS: Local institutional validation was not performed.CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning techniques predict colorectal surgical-site infections with higher accuracy than logistic regression. These techniques may be used to identify patients at increased risk and to target preventive interventions for surgical-site infection.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 466
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Resistance profiles in surgical-site infection
    Lenz, Andreas M.
    Fairweather, Mark
    Cheadle, William G.
    FUTURE MICROBIOLOGY, 2008, 3 (04) : 453 - 462
  • [32] Oncological outcome of surgical site infection after colorectal cancer surgery
    Jung Wook Huh
    Woo Yong Lee
    Yoon Ah Park
    Yong Beom Cho
    Hee Cheol Kim
    Seong Hyeon Yun
    Ho-Kyung Chun
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2019, 34 : 277 - 283
  • [33] Oncological outcome of surgical site infection after colorectal cancer surgery
    Huh, Jung Wook
    Lee, Woo Yong
    Park, Yoon Ah
    Cho, Yong Beom
    Kim, Hee Cheol
    Yun, Seong Hyeon
    Chun, Ho-Kyung
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2019, 34 (02) : 277 - 283
  • [34] Prognostic models for surgical-site infection in gastrointestinal surgery: systematic review
    McLean, Kenneth A.
    Goel, Tanvi
    Lawday, Samuel
    Riad, Aya
    Simoes, Joana
    Knight, Stephen R.
    Ghosh, Dhruva
    Glasbey, James C.
    Bhangu, Aneel
    Harrison, Ewen M.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2023, 110 (11) : 1441 - 1450
  • [35] Basics of surgical-site infection surveillance
    Roy, MC
    Perl, TM
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 18 (09): : 659 - 668
  • [36] Decrease in Staphylococcus aureus surgical-site infection rates after orthopaedic surgery after intranasal mupirocin ointment
    Coskun, D
    Aytac, J
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2004, 58 (01) : 90 - 91
  • [37] Prevention of surgical site infection in colorectal surgery
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    COLORECTAL CANCER, 2013, 2 (05) : 467 - 475
  • [38] Randomized clinical trial of preoperative intranasal mupirocin to reduce surgical-site infection after digestive surgery
    Suzuki, Y
    Kamigaki, T
    Fujino, Y
    Tominaga, M
    Ku, Y
    Kuroda, Y
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2003, 90 (09) : 1072 - 1075
  • [39] Factors associated with surgical-site infection after total laparoscopic hysterectomy
    Shigematsu, Kosuke
    Samejima, Koki
    Kizaki, Yuichirou
    Matsunaga, Shigetaka
    Nagai, Tomonori
    Takai, Yasushi
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2022, 5 (04): : 131 - 135
  • [40] Systematic evaluation of machine learning models for postoperative surgical site infection prediction
    van Boekel, Anna M.
    van der Meijden, Siri L.
    Arbous, Sesmu M.
    Nelissen, Rob G. H. H.
    Veldkamp, Karin E.
    Nieswaag, Emma B.
    Jochems, Kim F. T.
    Holtz, Jeroen
    Veenstra, Annekee van IJlzinga
    Reijman, Jeroen
    de Jong, Ype
    van Goor, Harry
    Wiewel, Maryse A.
    Schoones, Jan W.
    Geerts, Bart F.
    de Boer, Mark G. J.
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (12):