Improved Prediction of Surgical-Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery Using Machine Learning

被引:11
|
作者
Chen, Kevin A. [1 ]
Joisa, Chinmaya U. [2 ]
Stem, Jonathan M. [1 ]
Guillem, Jose G. [1 ]
Gomez, Shawn M. [2 ]
Kapadia, Muneera R. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[2] Univ N Carolina, Joint Dept Biomed Engn, Chapel Hill, NC USA
[3] Univ N Carolina, Dept Surg, Div Gastrointestinal Surg, 100 Manning Dr,Burnett Womack Bldg,Suite 4038, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Artificial intelligence; Colorectal surgery; Machine learning; Surgical-site infection; RISK CALCULATOR; MODEL;
D O I
10.1097/DCR.0000000000002559
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infection is a source of significant morbidity after colorectal surgery. Previous efforts to develop models that predict surgical-site infection have had limited accuracy. Machine learning has shown promise in predicting postoperative outcomes by identifying nonlinear patterns within large data sets.OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to seek usage of machine learning to develop a more accurate predictive model for colorectal surgical-site infections.DESIGN: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Quality Improvement Program database from years 2012 to 2019 and were split into training, validation, and test sets. Machine-learning techniques included random forest, gradient boosting, and artificial neural network. A logistic regression model was also created. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.SETTINGS: A national, multicenter data set.PATIENTS: Patients who underwent colorectal surgery.MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome (surgical-site infection) included patients who experienced superficial, deep, or organ-space surgical-site infections.RESULTS: The data set included 275,152 patients after the application of exclusion criteria. Of all patients, 10.7% experienced a surgical-site infection. Artificial neural network showed the best performance with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.769 (95% CI, 0.762-0.777), compared with 0.766 (95% CI, 0.759-0.774) for gradient boosting, 0.764 (95% CI, 0.756-0.772) for random forest, and 0.677 (95% CI, 0.669-0.685) for logistic regression. For the artificial neural network model, the strongest predictors of surgical-site infection were organ-space surgical-site infection present at time of surgery, operative time, oral antibiotic bowel preparation, and surgical approach.LIMITATIONS: Local institutional validation was not performed.CONCLUSIONS: Machine-learning techniques predict colorectal surgical-site infections with higher accuracy than logistic regression. These techniques may be used to identify patients at increased risk and to target preventive interventions for surgical-site infection.
引用
收藏
页码:458 / 466
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] A Study on Chances of Surgical-site Infection after Orthopedic Surgery with Factors Related to the Hospital
    Hojat, Mohsen
    Kalani, Navid
    Rahmanian, Mojdeh
    AMBIENT SCIENCE, 2019, 6H (02)
  • [22] Efforts to Prevent Surgical Site Infection After Colorectal Surgery
    Min, Byung Wook
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2015, 31 (06) : 211 - 212
  • [23] Dexamethasone and Surgical-Site Infection
    Corcoran, Tomas B.
    Myles, Paul S.
    Forbes, Andrew B.
    Cheng, Allen C.
    Bach, Leon A.
    O'Loughlin, Edmond
    Leslie, Kate
    Chan, Matthew T., V
    Story, David
    Short, Timothy G.
    Martin, Catherine
    Coutts, Pauline
    Ho, Kwok M.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2021, 384 (18): : 1731 - 1741
  • [24] Surgical-site infection surveillance in General Surgery: A critical issue
    Tourmousoglou, C. E.
    Yiannakopoulou, E. C.
    Kalapothaki, V.
    Bramis, J.
    Papadopoulos, J. St.
    JOURNAL OF CHEMOTHERAPY, 2008, 20 (03) : 312 - 318
  • [25] Validation and Recalibration of a Model for Predicting Surgical-Site Infection After Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery
    Rhodes, Stephen
    Sahmoud, Amine
    Jelovsek, J. Eric
    Bretschneider, C. Emi
    Gupta, Ankita
    Hijaz, Adonis K.
    Sheyn, David
    INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL, 2025, 36 (02) : 431 - 438
  • [26] A machine learning model to predict surgical site infection after surgery of lower extremity fractures
    Gutierrez-Naranjo, Jose M.
    Moreira, Alvaro
    Valero-Moreno, Eduardo
    Bullock, Travis S.
    Ogden, Liliana A.
    Zelle, Boris A.
    INTERNATIONAL ORTHOPAEDICS, 2024, 48 (07) : 1887 - 1896
  • [27] Progress in surgical-site infection surveillance
    Platt, R
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2002, 23 (07): : 361 - 363
  • [28] Machine learning applications for the prediction of surgical site infection in neurological operations
    Tunthanathip, Thara
    Sae-heng, Sakchai
    Oearsakul, Thakul
    Sakarunchai, Ittichai
    Kaewborisutsakul, Anukoon
    Taweesomboonyat, Chin
    NEUROSURGICAL FOCUS, 2019, 47 (02)
  • [29] The effect of damage control laparotomy on surgical-site infection risks after emergent intestinal surgery
    Ye, Maosong
    Little, Connor P.
    Wendt, Linder
    Galet, Colette
    Huang, Kevin
    Skeete, Dionne
    SURGERY, 2024, 176 (03) : 810 - 817
  • [30] Web-Based Calculator Predicts Surgical-Site Infection After Thoracolumbar Spine Surgery
    Lubelski, Daniel
    Feghali, James
    Ehresman, Jeff
    Pennington, Zach
    Schilling, Andrew
    Huq, Sakibul
    Medikonda, Ravi
    Theodore, Nicholas
    Sciubba, Daniel M.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 151 : E571 - E578