Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Djahanshahi, Nadia [1 ]
Patel, Keval B. [2 ]
Popoola-Samuel, Helen A. O. [3 ]
Fayyaz, Faris [4 ]
Akash, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] St George Univ, Surg, True Blue, Grenada
[2] Narendra Modi Med Coll, Surg, Ahmadabad, India
[3] Rush Univ, Coll Hlth & Sci, Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra JJM Med Coll, Internal Med, Davangere, India
关键词
rhinoplasty journey; rhinoplasty before and after; surgery; rhinoplasty; youtube; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.44804
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rhinoplasty, also referred to as a nose job or a reconstruction of the nose, is a surgical procedure that alters and reconstructs the nose for aesthetic or functional purposes. With the emergence of social media and modern internet accessibility, YouTube has gained popularity among users of all ages. Despite this, the accuracy and credibility of these videos and the information they include could be cause for concern.Aims: This study intends to assess the competence, quality, and dependability of the information in the videos related to "Rhinoplasty surgery" on YouTube.Methodology: This is a cross-sectional observational study that analyzes rhinoplasty information on YouTube. A Google Forms questionnaire was used to collect the data. The Global Quality Score (GQS), reliability score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were used to assess quality and reliability, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. The inclusion criteria were videos ranging from 1 minute to 20 minutes in duration, pertinent to the topic of rhinoplasty surgery, and in either English or Hindi.Results: A total of 71 videos were analyzed, and 70 videos were included. A comparison of GQS, reliability score, and VPI based on the type of uploader was done by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between VPI, GQS, and reliability score with that of the uploader of the video was found to be statistically insignificant (p<0.05). Videos uploaded by healthcare organizations, news outlets, patients, or other relevant groups have the most GQS (4.5), whereas videos uploaded by hospitals have the lowest. Conclusions: Compared to the type of uploader, videos have no statistically significant changes in quality, reliability, or video power, implying that the type of uploader does not necessarily impact the overall quality or reliability of the information presented in the investigated YouTube videos. While the majority of the videos addressed the indications of rhinoplasty and provided information about the etiology, there were gaps in discussing pre-procedural investigations and preventive measures. Due to our limitations, expanding the number of accounts used for search and increasing the number of videos might overcome the search algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Content Analysis of YouTube Videos Addressing Infant Hearing Loss: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gunjawate, Dhanshree R.
    Ravi, Rohit
    Bellon-Harn, Monica L.
    Manchaiah, Vinaya
    JOURNAL OF CONSUMER HEALTH ON THE INTERNET, 2021, 25 (01) : 20 - 34
  • [42] YouTube videos as a source of Hepatitis C-related information: A cross-sectional study
    Ortiz-Martinez, Yeimer
    Castellanos-Mateus, Santiago
    Rojas-Moreno, Heiner
    Suarez-Molina, Justin
    TRAVEL MEDICINE AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2020, 37
  • [43] An Overview of Rhinoplasty Practices: European Academy of Facial Plastic Surgery, Collaborative Cross-Sectional Study
    Mandavia, R.
    Parmar, D.
    Ahmed, M. N.
    Berber, V
    Sanz, D.
    Paulucci, B.
    D'Souza, A. R.
    EAFPS Rhinoplasty Res Network
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY, 2024, 40 (01) : 31 - 35
  • [44] A cross-sectional study on reliability and quality of YouTube® videos related to hallux valgus and evaluation of newly developed hallux valgus-specific survey tool
    Batar, Suat
    Soylemez, Mehmet Salih
    Kemah, Bahattin
    Cepni, Serdar Kamil
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2023, 9
  • [45] YouTube videos on oral systemic therapies for psoriasis: a cross-sectional analysis
    Reynolds, Kelly A.
    Pithadia, Deeti J.
    Lee, Erica B.
    Wu, Jashin J.
    JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGICAL TREATMENT, 2019, 30 (06) : 549 - 549
  • [46] Portrayal of Hearing Loss in YouTube Videos: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Manchaiah, Vinaya
    Bellon-Harn, Monica L.
    Godina, Itzel Mercado
    Beukes, Eldre W.
    Vinay
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2020, 29 (03) : 450 - 459
  • [47] Quality, Reliability, and Readability of Online Information on Rhinoplasty
    Ahsanuddin, Salma
    Cadwell, Joshua B.
    Povolotskiy, Roman
    Paskhover, Boris
    JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2021, 32 (06) : 2019 - 2023
  • [48] The Reliability and Quality of Short Videos as a Source of Dietary Guidance for Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Cross-sectional Study
    He, Zixuan
    Wang, Zhijie
    Song, Yihang
    Liu, Yilong
    Kang, Le
    Fang, Xue
    Wang, Tongchang
    Fan, Xuanming
    Li, Zhaoshen
    Wang, Shuling
    Bai, Yu
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2023, 25
  • [49] Assessment of the reliability and quality of breast cancer related videos on TikTok and Bilibili: cross-sectional study in China
    Liu, Hui
    Peng, Jialun
    Li, Lu
    Deng, Ao
    Huang, Xiangxin
    Yin, Guobin
    Ming, Jia
    Luo, Haojun
    Liang, Yinyin
    FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2024, 11
  • [50] Evaluation of YouTube videos as a source of information in traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: A cross-sectional study
    Engin, Onur
    Songur, Kadir
    MEDICINE, 2024, 103 (32)