Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Djahanshahi, Nadia [1 ]
Patel, Keval B. [2 ]
Popoola-Samuel, Helen A. O. [3 ]
Fayyaz, Faris [4 ]
Akash, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] St George Univ, Surg, True Blue, Grenada
[2] Narendra Modi Med Coll, Surg, Ahmadabad, India
[3] Rush Univ, Coll Hlth & Sci, Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra JJM Med Coll, Internal Med, Davangere, India
关键词
rhinoplasty journey; rhinoplasty before and after; surgery; rhinoplasty; youtube; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.44804
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rhinoplasty, also referred to as a nose job or a reconstruction of the nose, is a surgical procedure that alters and reconstructs the nose for aesthetic or functional purposes. With the emergence of social media and modern internet accessibility, YouTube has gained popularity among users of all ages. Despite this, the accuracy and credibility of these videos and the information they include could be cause for concern.Aims: This study intends to assess the competence, quality, and dependability of the information in the videos related to "Rhinoplasty surgery" on YouTube.Methodology: This is a cross-sectional observational study that analyzes rhinoplasty information on YouTube. A Google Forms questionnaire was used to collect the data. The Global Quality Score (GQS), reliability score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were used to assess quality and reliability, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. The inclusion criteria were videos ranging from 1 minute to 20 minutes in duration, pertinent to the topic of rhinoplasty surgery, and in either English or Hindi.Results: A total of 71 videos were analyzed, and 70 videos were included. A comparison of GQS, reliability score, and VPI based on the type of uploader was done by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between VPI, GQS, and reliability score with that of the uploader of the video was found to be statistically insignificant (p<0.05). Videos uploaded by healthcare organizations, news outlets, patients, or other relevant groups have the most GQS (4.5), whereas videos uploaded by hospitals have the lowest. Conclusions: Compared to the type of uploader, videos have no statistically significant changes in quality, reliability, or video power, implying that the type of uploader does not necessarily impact the overall quality or reliability of the information presented in the investigated YouTube videos. While the majority of the videos addressed the indications of rhinoplasty and provided information about the etiology, there were gaps in discussing pre-procedural investigations and preventive measures. Due to our limitations, expanding the number of accounts used for search and increasing the number of videos might overcome the search algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Preferred Nasolabial Angle in Rhinoplasty: A Cross-Sectional Analysis
    Alshawaf, Solaiman M.
    Mcguire, Connor
    ElAbd, Rawan
    Fakih-Gomez, Nabil
    Williams, Jason
    AlYouha, Sarah
    Samargandi, Osama A.
    AESTHETIC SURGERY JOURNAL, 2024, 44 (03) : 275 - 285
  • [22] An Evaluation of Male Rhinoplasty Videos on YouTube and TikTok: A DISCERN Analysis
    Tam, Benjamin
    Lin, Matthew E.
    Shah, Rishabh
    Ulloa, Ruben
    Luu, Neil
    Markarian, Alexander
    Moayer, Roxana
    FACIAL PLASTIC SURGERY & AESTHETIC MEDICINE, 2025, 27 (01) : 50 - 52
  • [23] The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Public Health Information Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination: Cross-sectional Study
    Chan, Calvin
    Sounderajah, Viknesh
    Daniels, Elisabeth
    Acharya, Amish
    Clarke, Jonathan
    Yalamanchili, Seema
    Normahani, Pasha
    Markar, Sheraz
    Ashrafian, Hutan
    Darzi, Ara
    JMIR PUBLIC HEALTH AND SURVEILLANCE, 2021, 7 (07):
  • [24] EVALUATION OF THE QUALITY AND RELIABILITY OF EXERCISE AND PHYSIOTHERAPY VIDEOS SHARED ON YOUTUBE FOR PATIENTS WITH HEMOPHILIA: A CROSS SECTIONAL STUDY
    Tat, Necati Muhammed
    Tat, Ayse Merve
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2023, 34 (01): : 133 - 140
  • [25] Retinoids: A cross-sectional study of YouTube videos including DISCERN scores
    Duvenjian, Christine
    Laborada, Jennifer
    Marsch, Amanda F.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF DERMATOLOGY, 2022, 87 (03) : AB104 - AB104
  • [26] A cross-sectional analysis of the content and quality of presurgical infant orthopedics videos on YouTube
    Khader, Osama
    Alrubaiaan, Raed
    Abdunabi, Farida
    Gyasudeen, Kabir Syed
    Rad, Fatemah
    Prasad, Sabarinath
    SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY, 2024, 44 (06) : 1709 - 1717
  • [27] Quality and Reliability of YouTube Video Contents About Sports Mouthguards: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Gezer, Ilke
    Saygili, Selin
    Gunver, Mehmet Guven
    Kasimoglu, Yelda
    Tuna-Ince, Elif Bahar
    DENTAL TRAUMATOLOGY, 2025, 41 (01) : 118 - 127
  • [28] Quality Assessment of Skin Cancer Videos Calls for Improved Patient Content: A YouTube Cross-Sectional Study
    Joly-Chevrier, Maxine
    Aly, Safin
    Lefrancois, Philippe
    JOURNAL OF CUTANEOUS MEDICINE AND SURGERY, 2023, 27 (04) : 407 - 408
  • [29] A cross-sectional study analyzing the quality of YouTube videos as a source of information for COVID-19 intubation
    Arslan, Baris
    Sugur, Tayfun
    Ciloglu, Osman
    Arslan, Ali
    Acik, Vedat
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, 2022, 72 (02): : 302 - 305
  • [30] Content Analysis and Quality Evaluation of Cesarean Delivery-Related Videos on YouTube: Cross-sectional Study
    Lee, Kyong-No
    Joo, Yeon Ji
    Choi, So Yeon
    Park, Sung Taek
    Lee, Keun-Young
    Kim, Youngmi
    Son, Ga-Hyun
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2021, 23 (07)