Rhinoplasty and YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Study to Assess the Quality, Dependability, and Reliability of Videos on Rhinoplasty

被引:0
|
作者
Djahanshahi, Nadia [1 ]
Patel, Keval B. [2 ]
Popoola-Samuel, Helen A. O. [3 ]
Fayyaz, Faris [4 ]
Akash, R. [5 ]
机构
[1] St George Univ, Surg, True Blue, Grenada
[2] Narendra Modi Med Coll, Surg, Ahmadabad, India
[3] Rush Univ, Coll Hlth & Sci, Neurol, Chicago, IL USA
[4] Dow Univ Hlth Sci, Surg, Karachi, Pakistan
[5] Jagadguru Jayadeva Murugarajendra JJM Med Coll, Internal Med, Davangere, India
关键词
rhinoplasty journey; rhinoplasty before and after; surgery; rhinoplasty; youtube; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.7759/cureus.44804
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction: Rhinoplasty, also referred to as a nose job or a reconstruction of the nose, is a surgical procedure that alters and reconstructs the nose for aesthetic or functional purposes. With the emergence of social media and modern internet accessibility, YouTube has gained popularity among users of all ages. Despite this, the accuracy and credibility of these videos and the information they include could be cause for concern.Aims: This study intends to assess the competence, quality, and dependability of the information in the videos related to "Rhinoplasty surgery" on YouTube.Methodology: This is a cross-sectional observational study that analyzes rhinoplasty information on YouTube. A Google Forms questionnaire was used to collect the data. The Global Quality Score (GQS), reliability score, and Video Power Index (VPI) were used to assess quality and reliability, and statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. The inclusion criteria were videos ranging from 1 minute to 20 minutes in duration, pertinent to the topic of rhinoplasty surgery, and in either English or Hindi.Results: A total of 71 videos were analyzed, and 70 videos were included. A comparison of GQS, reliability score, and VPI based on the type of uploader was done by the Kruskal-Wallis test. The association between VPI, GQS, and reliability score with that of the uploader of the video was found to be statistically insignificant (p<0.05). Videos uploaded by healthcare organizations, news outlets, patients, or other relevant groups have the most GQS (4.5), whereas videos uploaded by hospitals have the lowest. Conclusions: Compared to the type of uploader, videos have no statistically significant changes in quality, reliability, or video power, implying that the type of uploader does not necessarily impact the overall quality or reliability of the information presented in the investigated YouTube videos. While the majority of the videos addressed the indications of rhinoplasty and provided information about the etiology, there were gaps in discussing pre-procedural investigations and preventive measures. Due to our limitations, expanding the number of accounts used for search and increasing the number of videos might overcome the search algorithm.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Diabetes Mellitus on YouTube: A Cross-Sectional Observational Study to Assess the Quality and Reliability of Videos
    Mylavarapu, Maneeth
    Maheta, Darshilkumar
    Clarke, Shereece
    Parmar, Kashish
    Mohammed, Majaazuddin
    Vuyyuru, Chaitanya Sai
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [2] Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos as a Source of Patient Information on Rhinoplasty
    Oremule, Babatunde
    Patel, Alisha
    Orekoya, Oluwafikunayo
    Advani, Rajeev
    Bondin, Daniela
    JAMA OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD & NECK SURGERY, 2019, 145 (03) : 282 - 283
  • [3] Quality and Reliability of YouTube Videos on Myocardial Infarction: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Holge, Shubham
    Gogikar, Amaresh
    Sultana, Rafiya
    Rathod, Urvashi
    Chetarajupalli, Chandramouli
    Supriya, Holge Yarrabathina Laxmi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)
  • [4] Evaluating the quality and reliability of YouTube videos on scabies in children: A cross-sectional study
    Kacer, Emine Ozdemir
    Kacer, Ilayda
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (10):
  • [5] Quality, reliability, and popularity of YouTube videos on urticaria: a cross-sectional analysis
    Kaya, Oezge
    Solak, Sezgi S.
    ITALIAN JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY AND VENEREOLOGY, 2023, 158 (04) : 347 - 352
  • [6] The Quality, Reliability, and Popularity of YouTube Education Videos for Vestibular Rehabilitation: A Cross-sectional Study
    Yildiz, Selcuk
    Toros, Sema Zer
    OTOLOGY & NEUROTOLOGY, 2021, 42 (08) : E1077 - E1083
  • [7] Characteristics, reliability, and quality of YouTube videos on meralgia paresthetica: a descriptive cross-sectional study
    Cakmak, Elif Tarihci
    Celik, Serpil
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA BELGICA, 2024, 124 (04) : 1343 - 1351
  • [8] The Reliability and Quality of YouTube Videos as a Source of Information on Buerger's Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study
    Celik, Ersin
    Cora, Ahmet Rifki
    ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2023, 90 : 144 - 152
  • [9] Cross-sectional study on the quality of oral lichen planus videos on YouTube™
    Romano, Antonio
    Lauritano, Dorina
    Fiori, Fausto
    Di Petrillo, Marco
    Hasan, Iquebal
    Lucchese, Alberta
    Serpico, Rosario
    Di Stasio, Dario
    JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2021, 50 (02) : 220 - 228
  • [10] Accuracy, Quality, and Misinformation of YouTube AbortionProcedural Videos:Cross-Sectional Study
    Acero, Nicole
    Herrero, Emma
    Foncham, Juanita
    Mcilvaine, Jamie
    Kayaalp, Emre
    Figueora, Melissa
    Oladipo, Antonia Francis
    JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2024, 26