Towards a global sustainable development agenda built on social-ecological resilience

被引:14
|
作者
Scown, Murray W. [1 ]
Craig, Robin K. [2 ]
Allen, Craig R. [3 ]
Gunderson, Lance [4 ]
Angeler, David G. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Garcia, Jorge H. [9 ]
Garmestani, Ahjond [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Lund Univ Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Gould Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Ctr Resilience Agr Working Landscapes, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Brain Capital Alliance, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Deakin Univ, Inst Mental & Phys Hlth & Clin Translat, IMPACT, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Los Andes, Sch Management, Bogota, Colombia
[10] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Gulf Breeze, FL USA
[11] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Ctr Water Oceans & Sustainabil Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2023年 / 6卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
earth systems (land; water; and atmospheric); ecology and biodiversity; natural resources (biological and non-biological); policies; politics and governance; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2023.8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) articulate societal aspirations for people and our planet. Many scientists have criticised the SDGs and some have suggested that a better understanding of the complex interactions between society and the environment should underpin the next global development agenda. We further this discussion through the theory of social-ecological resilience, which emphasises the ability of systems to absorb, adapt, and transform in the face of change. We determine the strengths of the current SDGs, which should form a basis for the next agenda, and identify key gaps that should be filled. Technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) are past their halfway point and the next global development agenda will soon need to be developed. While laudable, the SDGs have received strong criticism from many, and scholars have proposed that adopting complex adaptive or social-ecological system approaches would increase the effectiveness of the agenda. Here we dive deeper into these discussions to explore how the theory of social-ecological resilience could serve as a strong foundation for the next global sustainable development agenda. We identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current SDGs by determining which of the 169 targets address each of 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience that we have compiled from the literature. The SDGs with the strongest connections to social-ecological resilience are the environment-focus goals (SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15), which are also the goals consistently under-prioritised in the implementation of the current agenda. In terms of the 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience, the SDG strengths lie in their communication, inclusive decision making, financial support, regulatory incentives, economic diversity, and transparency in governance and law. On the contrary, ecological factors of resilience are seriously lacking in the SDGs, particularly with regards to scale, cross-scale interactions, and non-stationarity. Social media summaryThe post-2030 agenda should build on strengths of SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15, and fill gaps in scale, variability, and feedbacks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Recentring the Political in Education for Sustainable Development: Participatory Photovoice Research as Prefigurative Politics Towards Social-ecological Transformation
    Pettig, Fabian
    Lippe, Daniela
    AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL EDUCATION, 2024, 40 (03) : 628 - 642
  • [42] Integrated Assessment of the Impact of Cropland Use Transition on Food Production Towards the Sustainable Development of Social-Ecological Systems
    Liao, Yixin
    Lu, Xiaojun
    Liu, Jialin
    Huang, Jiajun
    Qu, Yue
    Qiao, Zhi
    Xie, Yuangui
    Liao, Xiaofeng
    Liu, Luo
    AGRONOMY-BASEL, 2024, 14 (12):
  • [43] Zoning for the sustainable development mode of global social-ecological systems: From the supply-production-demand perspective
    Du, Wenpeng
    Yan, Huimin
    Feng, Zhiming
    Liu, Guihuan
    Li, Kelei
    Peng, Li
    Xiang, Xiaozhi
    Yang, Yanzhao
    RESOURCES CONSERVATION AND RECYCLING, 2024, 203
  • [44] Social-ecological resilience: Insights and issues for planning theory
    Wilkinson, Cathy
    PLANNING THEORY, 2012, 11 (02) : 148 - 169
  • [45] Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Olsson, Per
    Chapin, F. S., III
    Holling, C. S.
    LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY, 2013, 28 (06) : 1139 - 1150
  • [46] Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses
    Folke, Carl
    GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03): : 253 - 267
  • [47] Resilience, experimentation, and scale mismatches in social-ecological landscapes
    Graeme S. Cumming
    Per Olsson
    F. S. Chapin
    C. S. Holling
    Landscape Ecology, 2013, 28 : 1139 - 1150
  • [48] Social-ecological resilience and the quest for sustainability as object of science
    Walter Alfredo Salas-Zapata
    Leonardo Alberto Ríos-Osorio
    Jorge Antonio Mejía-Escobar
    Environment, Development and Sustainability, 2017, 19 : 2237 - 2252
  • [49] The Capacity of Property Rights to Accommodate Social-Ecological Resilience
    Barnes, Richard A.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (01):
  • [50] Supply network resilience capabilities: a social-ecological perspective
    Statsenko, Larissa
    Jayasinghe, Ruchini Senarath
    Soosay, Claudine
    SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2024, 29 (01) : 1 - 26