Towards a global sustainable development agenda built on social-ecological resilience

被引:14
|
作者
Scown, Murray W. [1 ]
Craig, Robin K. [2 ]
Allen, Craig R. [3 ]
Gunderson, Lance [4 ]
Angeler, David G. [5 ,6 ,7 ,8 ]
Garcia, Jorge H. [9 ]
Garmestani, Ahjond [10 ,11 ]
机构
[1] Lund Univ, Lund Univ Ctr Sustainabil Studies LUCSUS, Lund, Sweden
[2] Univ Southern Calif, Gould Sch Law, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Ctr Resilience Agr Working Landscapes, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[4] Emory Univ, Dept Environm Sci, Atlanta, GA USA
[5] Swedish Univ Agr Sci, Dept Aquat Sci & Assessment, Uppsala, Sweden
[6] Univ Nebraska Lincoln, Sch Nat Resources, Lincoln, NE USA
[7] Brain Capital Alliance, San Francisco, CA USA
[8] Deakin Univ, Inst Mental & Phys Hlth & Clin Translat, IMPACT, Geelong, Vic, Australia
[9] Univ Los Andes, Sch Management, Bogota, Colombia
[10] US EPA, Off Res & Dev, Gulf Breeze, FL USA
[11] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Ctr Water Oceans & Sustainabil Law, Utrecht, Netherlands
来源
GLOBAL SUSTAINABILITY | 2023年 / 6卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
earth systems (land; water; and atmospheric); ecology and biodiversity; natural resources (biological and non-biological); policies; politics and governance; DEVELOPMENT GOALS; KNOWLEDGE; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1017/sus.2023.8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Non-technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) articulate societal aspirations for people and our planet. Many scientists have criticised the SDGs and some have suggested that a better understanding of the complex interactions between society and the environment should underpin the next global development agenda. We further this discussion through the theory of social-ecological resilience, which emphasises the ability of systems to absorb, adapt, and transform in the face of change. We determine the strengths of the current SDGs, which should form a basis for the next agenda, and identify key gaps that should be filled. Technical summaryThe United Nations' sustainable development goals (SDGs) are past their halfway point and the next global development agenda will soon need to be developed. While laudable, the SDGs have received strong criticism from many, and scholars have proposed that adopting complex adaptive or social-ecological system approaches would increase the effectiveness of the agenda. Here we dive deeper into these discussions to explore how the theory of social-ecological resilience could serve as a strong foundation for the next global sustainable development agenda. We identify the strengths and weaknesses of the current SDGs by determining which of the 169 targets address each of 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience that we have compiled from the literature. The SDGs with the strongest connections to social-ecological resilience are the environment-focus goals (SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15), which are also the goals consistently under-prioritised in the implementation of the current agenda. In terms of the 43 factors affecting social-ecological resilience, the SDG strengths lie in their communication, inclusive decision making, financial support, regulatory incentives, economic diversity, and transparency in governance and law. On the contrary, ecological factors of resilience are seriously lacking in the SDGs, particularly with regards to scale, cross-scale interactions, and non-stationarity. Social media summaryThe post-2030 agenda should build on strengths of SDGs 2, 6, 13, 14, 15, and fill gaps in scale, variability, and feedbacks.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Sustainability and social-ecological resilience in the Ebro delta
    Romagosa, Francesc
    Chelleri, Lorenzo
    Trujillo Martinez, Antonio Jose
    Breton, Francoise
    DOCUMENTS D ANALISI GEOGRAFICA, 2013, 59 (02): : 239 - 263
  • [32] Introduction: Where in Law is Social-Ecological Resilience?
    Ebbesson, Jonas
    Hey, Ellen
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (03):
  • [33] Sustainable Land-Use Planning to Improve the Coastal Resilience of the Social-Ecological Landscape
    Kim, Min
    You, Soojin
    Chon, Jinhyung
    Lee, Junga
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2017, 9 (07)
  • [34] Can Law Foster Social-Ecological Resilience?
    Garmestani, Ahjond S.
    Allen, Craig R.
    Benson, Melinda H.
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2013, 18 (02):
  • [35] Unifying Research on Social-Ecological Resilience and Collapse
    Cumming, Graeme S.
    Peterson, Garry D.
    TRENDS IN ECOLOGY & EVOLUTION, 2017, 32 (09) : 695 - 713
  • [36] Building Resilience in Ecological Restoration Processes: A Social-Ecological Perspective
    Krievins, Katrina
    Plummer, Ryan
    Baird, Julia
    ECOLOGICAL RESTORATION, 2018, 36 (03) : 195 - 207
  • [37] Looking back to shape the future: Trajectories and resilience of social-ecological systems in the Global South
    Ezzine-de-Blas, Driss
    Hayes, Tanya
    Corbera, Esteve
    Avila-Foucat, V. Sophie
    AMBIO, 2024, 53 (12) : 1715 - 1721
  • [38] Exploring resilience in social-ecological systems. Comparative studies and theory development
    Reusswig, Fritz
    REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE, 2007, 7 (02) : 121 - 122
  • [39] Stasis and change: social psychological insights into social-ecological resilience
    Hobman, Elizabeth V.
    Walker, Iain
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2015, 20 (01):
  • [40] Expanding the contribution of the social sciences to social-ecological resilience research
    Stone-Jovicich, Samantha
    Goldstein, Bruce E.
    Brown, Katrina
    Plummer, Ryan
    Olsson, Per
    ECOLOGY AND SOCIETY, 2018, 23 (01):