How virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality facilitate teacher education: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Li, Yanping [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Educ Psychol & Special Educ, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Humanities, 211 Huimin Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
augmented reality; mixed reality; teacher education; virtual reality; SELF-EFFICACY; IMPACT; STUDENTS; DISPLAYS;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12949
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundVirtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) have sparked recently in improving the effectiveness of teacher education. However, there is a lack of review regarding the utilisation of these technologies in this field. These three technologies, namely VR, AR and MR, can be collectively referred to as extended reality (XR) (as mentioned in reference Tang et al., 2022).ObjectivesRemarkably, the utilisation of XR-based technologies in teacher education needs to be explored. Moreover, research questions related to the training objectives, methodological features, and the effects of XR-based teacher education remain unanswered.MethodsTo this end, the present study conducted a systematic review to analyse 52 articles from six databases (including Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library).ResultsThe results indicate that XR technologies have been primarily used to train teachers' procedural knowledge, for instance, classroom management. Furthermore, most studies have primarily focused on pre-service teachers (PSTs) rather than in-service teachers and utilised small sample sizes, with VR emerging as the most frequently employed tool. Finally, the majority of the studies reported that XR-based training affected teachers positively.ConclusionsIt urges researchers and developers to consider theory-driven training design, which increases the potential to better understand what features of XR promote in-service teachers' and PSTs' learning and how they do so. This article additionally conducts a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of XR-based teacher education to offer more insightful recommendations and foster further discussion. What is already known about this topicImplications for practice and/or policy Numerous empirical studies have shown the great potential of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) technologies utilised in teacher education. This rapidly growing field calls upon a synthesis of the use of extended reality (XR) technologies in teacher education.What this paper adds Presents a systematic review of XR-based teacher education, which provides a thorough overview of how previous research utilised XR technologies to promote teacher education. Conducted a SWOT analysis and pointed out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of XR-based teacher education.A depth of understanding of previous research on this topic may enable educators to better plan and promote teacher education programs. It can guide researchers to optimise the multisensory immersion and interactivity of the virtual systems and platforms and develop suitable materials and tasks to be used in such learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1294
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality in Education (VAMrE 2017)
    Chang, Kuo-En
    Zhang, Jia
    Liu, Tzu-Chien
    ADJUNCT PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2017 IEEE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON MIXED AND AUGMENTED REALITY (ISMAR-ADJUNCT), 2017, : 293 - 293
  • [42] Augmented and Virtual Reality for Diet and Nutritional Education: A Systematic Literature Review
    Yigitbas, Enes
    Mazur, Janet
    17TH ACM INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON PERVASIVE TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO ASSISTIVE ENVIRONMENTS, PETRA 2024, 2024, : 88 - 97
  • [43] Virtual reality and augmented reality in radiation oncology education - A review and expert commentary
    Kok, David L.
    Dushyanthen, Sathana
    Peters, Gabrielle
    Sapkaroski, Daniel
    Barrett, Michelle
    Sim, Jenny
    Eriksen, Jesper Grau
    TECHNICAL INNOVATIONS & PATIENT SUPPORT IN RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2022, 24 : 25 - 31
  • [44] The use of virtual reality and augmented reality in ultrasound education, a narrative review of the literature
    Saliba, Thomas
    Pather, Sanjiva
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ULTRASOUND, 2025, 53 (02) : 315 - 324
  • [45] Research on Immersion for Learning Using Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality and Mixed Reality
    Chang, Chun-Yen
    Chen, Chia-Li Debra
    Chang, Wei-Kai
    ENFANCE, 2019, (03) : 413 - 426
  • [46] Augmented Reality and Engineering Education: A Systematic Review
    Alvarez-Marin, Alejandro
    Velazquez-Iturbide, J. Angel
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON LEARNING TECHNOLOGIES, 2021, 14 (06): : 817 - 831
  • [47] A systematic review of augmented reality in chemistry education
    Mazzuco, Alex
    Krassmann, Aliane Loureiro
    Reategui, Eliseo
    Gomes, Raquel Salcedo
    REVIEW OF EDUCATION, 2022, 10 (01):
  • [48] A Systematic Review of Augmented Reality in STEM Education
    Ajit, Gloria
    Lucas, Terry
    Kanyan, Ringah
    ESTUDIOS DE ECONOMIA APLICADA, 2021, 39 (01):
  • [49] Augmented Reality, Mixed Reality, and Hybrid Approach in Healthcare Simulation: A Systematic Review
    Viglialoro, Rosanna Maria
    Condino, Sara
    Turini, Giuseppe
    Carbone, Marina
    Ferrari, Vincenzo
    Gesi, Marco
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (05): : 1 - 20
  • [50] Augmented reality in STEM education: a systematic review
    Sirakaya, Mustafa
    Sirakaya, Didem Alsancak
    INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2022, 30 (08) : 1556 - 1569