How virtual reality, augmented reality and mixed reality facilitate teacher education: A systematic review

被引:3
|
作者
Wang, Qin [1 ]
Li, Yanping [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Saskatchewan, Dept Educ Psychol & Special Educ, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[2] Sichuan Agr Univ, Coll Humanities, 211 Huimin Rd, Chengdu, Sichuan, Peoples R China
关键词
augmented reality; mixed reality; teacher education; virtual reality; SELF-EFFICACY; IMPACT; STUDENTS; DISPLAYS;
D O I
10.1111/jcal.12949
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
BackgroundVirtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) have sparked recently in improving the effectiveness of teacher education. However, there is a lack of review regarding the utilisation of these technologies in this field. These three technologies, namely VR, AR and MR, can be collectively referred to as extended reality (XR) (as mentioned in reference Tang et al., 2022).ObjectivesRemarkably, the utilisation of XR-based technologies in teacher education needs to be explored. Moreover, research questions related to the training objectives, methodological features, and the effects of XR-based teacher education remain unanswered.MethodsTo this end, the present study conducted a systematic review to analyse 52 articles from six databases (including Web of Science, Scopus, IEEE Xplore, ERIC, ScienceDirect, and ACM Digital Library).ResultsThe results indicate that XR technologies have been primarily used to train teachers' procedural knowledge, for instance, classroom management. Furthermore, most studies have primarily focused on pre-service teachers (PSTs) rather than in-service teachers and utilised small sample sizes, with VR emerging as the most frequently employed tool. Finally, the majority of the studies reported that XR-based training affected teachers positively.ConclusionsIt urges researchers and developers to consider theory-driven training design, which increases the potential to better understand what features of XR promote in-service teachers' and PSTs' learning and how they do so. This article additionally conducts a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats) analysis of XR-based teacher education to offer more insightful recommendations and foster further discussion. What is already known about this topicImplications for practice and/or policy Numerous empirical studies have shown the great potential of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR) and mixed reality (MR) technologies utilised in teacher education. This rapidly growing field calls upon a synthesis of the use of extended reality (XR) technologies in teacher education.What this paper adds Presents a systematic review of XR-based teacher education, which provides a thorough overview of how previous research utilised XR technologies to promote teacher education. Conducted a SWOT analysis and pointed out the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of XR-based teacher education.A depth of understanding of previous research on this topic may enable educators to better plan and promote teacher education programs. It can guide researchers to optimise the multisensory immersion and interactivity of the virtual systems and platforms and develop suitable materials and tasks to be used in such learning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:1276 / 1294
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The effectiveness of virtual reality, augmented reality, and mixed reality training in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Su, Shilong
    Wang, Ruideng
    Zhou, Rubing
    Chen, Zhengyang
    Zhou, Fang
    JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND RESEARCH, 2023, 18 (01)
  • [32] Virtual, mixed, and augmented reality: a systematic review for immersive systems research
    Liberatore, Matthew J.
    Wagner, William P.
    VIRTUAL REALITY, 2021, 25 (03) : 773 - 799
  • [33] Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Reality Interventions for Physical Activity: A Systematic Review
    Odenigbo, Ifeanyi Paul
    Reen, Jaisheen Kour
    Eneze, Chimamaka
    Friday, Aniefiok
    Orji, Rita
    2022 IEEE 10TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SERIOUS GAMES AND APPLICATIONS FOR HEALTH(SEGAH' 22), 2022,
  • [34] Virtual, mixed, and augmented reality: a systematic review for immersive systems research
    Matthew J. Liberatore
    William P. Wagner
    Virtual Reality, 2021, 25 : 773 - 799
  • [35] How Augmented Reality Is Poised to Outpace Virtual Reality
    Wiederhold, Brenda K.
    CYBERPSYCHOLOGY BEHAVIOR AND SOCIAL NETWORKING, 2017, 20 (08) : 461 - 462
  • [36] How can virtual and augmented reality facilitate international business?
    Kshetri, Nir
    Dwivedi, Yogesh K.
    THUNDERBIRD INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS REVIEW, 2024, 66 (02) : 201 - 210
  • [37] Virtual and Augmented Reality in Education
    Gudoniene, Daina
    Rutkauskiene, Danguole
    BALTIC JOURNAL OF MODERN COMPUTING, 2019, 7 (02): : 293 - 300
  • [38] Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Artificial Intelligence in Orthopedic Surgery: A Systematic Review
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    De Salvatore, Sergio
    Candela, Vincenzo
    Zollo, Giuliano
    Calabrese, Giovanni
    Fioravanti, Sara
    Giannone, Lucia
    Marchetti, Anna
    De Marinis, Maria Grazia
    Denaro, Vincenzo
    APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL, 2021, 11 (07):
  • [39] Utility of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Literature
    Sumdani, Hasan
    Aguilar-Salinas, Pedro
    Avila, Mauricio J.
    Barber, Samuel R.
    Dumont, Travis
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 161 : E8 - E17
  • [40] Metaverse, virtual reality and augmented reality in total shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review
    Longo, Umile Giuseppe
    Lalli, Alberto
    Gobbato, Bruno
    Nazarian, Ara
    BMC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS, 2024, 25 (01)