Conservative Surrogate Modeling of Crosstalk with Application to Uncertainty Quantification

被引:1
|
作者
Manfredi, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Elect & Telecommun, EMC Grp, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
2023 IEEE 27TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL AND POWER INTEGRITY, SPI | 2023年
关键词
Bayesian estimation; crosstalk; Gaussian processes; Kriging; machine learning; surrogate modeling; uncertainty quantification; INTEGRITY; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Machine learning methods are attracting a great interest as surrogate modeling tools for signal and power integrity problems. However, an open issue is that it is often difficult to assess the model trustworthiness in generalizing beyond the training data. In this regard, Gaussian process (GP) models notably provide an indication of the prediction confidence due to the limited amount of training samples. They are wildly used as surrogates in design exploration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification tasks. Nevertheless, their prediction confidence does not account for the uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the GP parameters, which is also part of the training process. In this paper, we discuss two improved GP formulations that take into account the additional uncertainty related to the estimation of (some) GP parameters, thereby leading to more reliable and conservative confidence levels. The proposed framework is applied to the uncertainty quantification of the maximum transient crosstalk in a microstrip interconnect.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] An efficient Bayesian uncertainty quantification approach with application to k-ω-γ transition modeling
    Zhang, Jincheng
    Fu, Song
    COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2018, 161 : 211 - 224
  • [42] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION OF RELIABILITY ANALYSIS UNDER SURROGATE MODEL UNCERTAINTY USING GAUSSIAN PROCESS
    Bae, Sangjune
    Park, Chanyoung
    Kim, Nam H.
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL DESIGN ENGINEERING TECHNICAL CONFERENCES AND COMPUTERS AND INFORMATION IN ENGINEERING CONFERENCE, 2018, VOL 2B, 2018,
  • [43] Multivariate sensitivity-adaptive polynomial chaos expansion for high-dimensional surrogate modeling and uncertainty quantification
    Loukrezis, Dimitrios
    Diehl, Eric
    De Gersem, Herbert
    APPLIED MATHEMATICAL MODELLING, 2025, 137
  • [44] Quantification of model uncertainty in environmental modeling
    Ming Ye
    Philip D. Meyer
    Yu-Feng Lin
    Shlomo P. Neuman
    Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2010, 24 : 807 - 808
  • [45] Quantification of Modeling Uncertainty in Aeroelastic Analyses
    Riley, Matthew E.
    Grandhi, Ramana V.
    Kolonay, Raymond
    JOURNAL OF AIRCRAFT, 2011, 48 (03): : 866 - 873
  • [46] Uncertainty quantification and propagation in CALPHAD modeling
    Honarmandi, Pejman
    Paulson, Noah H.
    Arroyave, Raymundo
    Stan, Marius
    MODELLING AND SIMULATION IN MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 27 (03)
  • [47] Quantification of model uncertainty in environmental modeling
    Ye, Ming
    Meyer, Philip D.
    Lin, Yu-Feng
    Neuman, Shlomo P.
    STOCHASTIC ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND RISK ASSESSMENT, 2010, 24 (06) : 807 - 808
  • [48] UNCERTAINTY QUANTIFICATION IN CLIMATE MODELING AND PROJECTION
    Qian, Yun
    Jackson, Charles
    Giorgi, Filippo
    Booth, Ben
    Duan, Qingyun
    Forest, Chris
    Higdon, Dave
    Hou, Z. Jason
    Huerta, Gabriel
    BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2016, 97 (05) : 821 - 824
  • [49] Resampling strategies to improve surrogate model-based uncertainty quantification: Application to LES of LS89
    Roy, Pamphile T.
    Segui, Luis Miguel
    Jouhaud, Jean-Christophe
    Gicquel, Laurent
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN FLUIDS, 2018, 87 (12) : 607 - 627
  • [50] Surrogate-assisted uncertainty modeling of embankment settlement
    Wang, Tengfei
    Chen, Weihang
    Li, Taifeng
    Connolly, David P.
    Luo, Qiang
    Liu, Kaiwen
    Zhang, Wensheng
    COMPUTERS AND GEOTECHNICS, 2023, 159