Conservative Surrogate Modeling of Crosstalk with Application to Uncertainty Quantification

被引:1
|
作者
Manfredi, Paolo [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Torino, Dept Elect & Telecommun, EMC Grp, I-10129 Turin, Italy
来源
2023 IEEE 27TH WORKSHOP ON SIGNAL AND POWER INTEGRITY, SPI | 2023年
关键词
Bayesian estimation; crosstalk; Gaussian processes; Kriging; machine learning; surrogate modeling; uncertainty quantification; INTEGRITY; SIGNAL;
D O I
10.1109/SPI57109.2023.10145575
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Machine learning methods are attracting a great interest as surrogate modeling tools for signal and power integrity problems. However, an open issue is that it is often difficult to assess the model trustworthiness in generalizing beyond the training data. In this regard, Gaussian process (GP) models notably provide an indication of the prediction confidence due to the limited amount of training samples. They are wildly used as surrogates in design exploration, optimization, and uncertainty quantification tasks. Nevertheless, their prediction confidence does not account for the uncertainty introduced by the estimation of the GP parameters, which is also part of the training process. In this paper, we discuss two improved GP formulations that take into account the additional uncertainty related to the estimation of (some) GP parameters, thereby leading to more reliable and conservative confidence levels. The proposed framework is applied to the uncertainty quantification of the maximum transient crosstalk in a microstrip interconnect.
引用
收藏
页数:4
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Uncertainty quantification of squeal instability via surrogate modelling
    Nobari, Amir
    Ouyang, Huajiang
    Bannister, Paul
    MECHANICAL SYSTEMS AND SIGNAL PROCESSING, 2015, 60-61 : 887 - 908
  • [22] Surrogate approach to uncertainty quantification of neural networks for regression
    Kang, Myeonginn
    Kang, Seokho
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 139
  • [23] Uncertainty Quantification in Materials Modeling
    Dienstfrey, Andrew
    Phelan, Frederick R., Jr.
    Christensen, Stephen
    Strachan, Alejandro
    Santosa, Fadil
    Boisvert, Ronald
    JOM, 2014, 66 (07) : 1342 - 1344
  • [24] Application of uncertainty quantification methods for coal devolatilization kinetics in gasifier modeling
    Gel, Aytekin
    Chaudhari, Kiran
    Turton, Richard
    Nicoletti, Philip
    POWDER TECHNOLOGY, 2014, 265 : 66 - 75
  • [25] Uncertainty Quantification in Chemical Modeling
    Mirzayeva, A.
    Slavinskaya, N. A.
    Abbasi, M.
    Starcke, J. H.
    Li, W.
    Frenklach, M.
    EURASIAN CHEMICO-TECHNOLOGICAL JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (01) : 33 - 43
  • [26] A method for epistemic uncertainty quantification and application to uniaxial tension modeling of polymers
    Zhang, Wei
    Cho, Chongdu
    JOURNAL OF MECHANICAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 29 (03) : 1199 - 1206
  • [27] A method for epistemic uncertainty quantification and application to uniaxial tension modeling of polymers
    Wei Zhang
    Chongdu Cho
    Journal of Mechanical Science and Technology, 2015, 29 : 1199 - 1206
  • [28] Uncertainty Quantification in Materials Modeling
    Andrew Dienstfrey
    Frederick R. Phelan
    Stephen Christensen
    Alejandro Strachan
    Fadil Santosa
    Ronald Boisvert
    JOM, 2014, 66 : 1342 - 1344
  • [29] Fourier-enhanced reduced-order surrogate modeling for uncertainty quantification in electric machine design
    Partovizadeh, Aylar
    Schoeps, Sebastian
    Loukrezis, Dimitrios
    ENGINEERING WITH COMPUTERS, 2025,
  • [30] Accelerating uncertainty quantification in incremental dynamic analysis using dimension reduction-based surrogate modeling
    Giovanis, Dimitris G.
    Taflanidis, Alexandros
    Shields, Michael D.
    BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING, 2025, 23 (01) : 391 - 410