Patient Characteristics Associated with Growth of Patient-Derived Tumor Implants in Mice (Patient-Derived Xenografts)

被引:0
|
作者
Guerrero, Tatiana Hernandez [1 ]
Banos, Natalia [2 ]
Nevado, Laura del Puerto [3 ]
Mahillo-Fernandez, Ignacio [2 ,3 ]
De-Speville, Bernard Doger [2 ]
Calvo, Emiliano [4 ]
Wick, Michael [5 ]
Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus [2 ,3 ]
Moreno, Victor [2 ]
机构
[1] START Barcelona HM Nou Delfos, Avinguda Vallcarca 151, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] START Madrid Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Ave Reyes Catolicos 2, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] IIS Fdn Jimenez Diaz UAM, Translat Oncol Div, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] START Madrid CIOCC HM Sanchinarro, C Ona 10, Madrid 28050, Spain
[5] XENOStart START San Antonio, 4383 Med Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
patient-derived xenografts; PDX; mice; models; translational; prediction; engraftment; tumor growth; cancer; oncology; preclinical; SERUM LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE; MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY; NUDE-MICE; OVARIAN-CANCER; LUNG CANCERS; CELL-LINES; MODELS; ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15225402
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have defined the field of translational cancer research in recent years, becoming one of the most-used tools in early drug development. The process of establishing cancer models in mice has turned out to be challenging, since little research focuses on evaluating which factors impact engraftment success. We sought to determine the clinical, pathological, or molecular factors which may predict better engraftment rates in PDXs. Methods: between March 2017 and January 2021, tumor samples obtained from patients with primary or metastatic cancer were implanted into athymic nude mice. A full comprehensive evaluation of baseline factors associated with the patients and patients' tumors was performed, with the goal of potentially identifying predictive markers of engraftment. We focused on clinical (patient factors) pathological (patients' tumor samples) and molecular (patients' tumor samples) characteristics, analyzed either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), which were associated with the likelihood of final engraftment, as well as with tumor growth rates in xenografts. Results: a total of 585 tumor samples were collected and implanted. Twenty-one failed to engraft, due to lack of malignant cells. Of 564 tumor-positive samples, 187 (33.2%) grew at time of analysis. The study was able to find correlation and predictive value for engraftment for the following: the use of systemic antibiotics by the patient within 2 weeks of sampling (38.1% (72/189) antibiotics- group vs. 30.7% (115/375) no-antibiotics) (p = 0.048), and the administration of systemic steroids to the patients within 2 weeks of sampling (41.5% (34/48) steroids vs. 31.7% (153/329), no-steroids) (p = 0.049). Regarding patient's baseline tests, we found certain markers could help predict final engraftment success: for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, 34.1% (140/411) of tumors derived from patients with baseline blood LDH levels above the upper limit of normality (ULN) achieved growth, against 30.7% (47/153) with normal LDH (p = 0.047). Histological tumor characteristics, such as grade of differentiation, were also correlated. Grade 1: 25.4% (47/187), grade 2: 34.8% (65/187) and grade 3: 40.1% (75/187) tumors achieved successful growth (p = 0.043), suggesting the higher the grade, the higher the likelihood of success. Similarly, higher ki67 levels were also correlated with better engraftment rates: low (Ki67 < 15%): 8.9% (9/45) achieved growth vs. high (Ki67 >= 15%): 31% (35/113) (p: 0.002). Other markers of aggressiveness such as the presence of lymphovascular invasion in tumor sample of origin was also predictive: 42.2% (97/230) with lymphovascular vs. 26.9% (90/334) of samples with no invasion (p = 0.0001). From the molecular standpoint, mismatch-repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors showed better engraftment rates: 62.1% (18/29) achieved growth vs. 40.8% (75/184) of proficient tumors (p = 0.026). A total of 84 PDX were breast models, among which 57.9% (11/19) ER-negative models grew, vs. 15.4% (10/65) of ER-positive models (p = 0.0001), also consonant with ER-negative tumors being more aggressive. BRAFmut cancers are more likely to achieve engraftment during the development of PDX models. Lastly, tumor growth rates during first passages can help establish a cutoff point for the decision-making process during PDX development, since the higher the tumor grades, the higher the likelihood of success. Conclusions: tumors with higher grade and Ki67 protein expression, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, with dMMR and are negative for ER expression have a higher probability of achieving growth in the process of PDX development. The use of steroids and/or antibiotics in the patient prior to sampling can also impact the likelihood of success in PDX development. Lastly, establishing a cutoff point for tumor growth rates could guide the decision-making process during PDX development.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Patient-derived explants as tumor models
    Hubert, Christopher G.
    Rich, Jeremy N.
    CANCER CELL, 2022, 40 (04) : 348 - 350
  • [42] Cholangiocarcinoma patient-derived models in the NCI Patient-Derived Models Repository
    Evrard, Yvonne A.
    Timme, Cindy R.
    Das, Biswajit
    Bliss, Gareth
    Bonomi, Carrie
    Border, Carley
    Chang, Ting-Chia
    Chen, Alice
    Chen, Li
    Crespo-Eugeni, Michelle A.
    Cooper, Kevin
    Czarra, Natalie
    Czernia, Isabella
    Dougherty, Kelly
    Gibson, Marion
    Grinnage-Pulley, Tara
    Jiwani, Shahanawaz
    Kalmbach, Keegan
    Karlovich, Chris A.
    McGlynn, Chelsea
    Mullendore, Michael
    Murphy, Matthew
    Pauly, Rini
    Plater, Kevin
    Steed, Jessica
    Stockwin, Luke
    Uzelac, Shannon
    Wu, Peter I-Fan
    Newton, Dianne L.
    Williams, P. Mickey
    Hollingshead, Melinda G.
    Doroshow, James H.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2024, 84 (06)
  • [43] Tumor Sequencing and Patient-Derived Xenografts in the Neoadjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer
    Goetz, Matthew P.
    Kalari, Krishna R.
    Suman, Vera J.
    Moyer, Ann M.
    Yu, Jia
    Visscher, Daniel W.
    Dockter, Travis J.
    Vedell, Peter T.
    Sinnwell, Jason P.
    Tang, Xiaojia
    Thompson, Kevin J.
    McLaughlin, Sarah A.
    Moreno-Aspitia, Alvaro
    Copland, John A.
    Northfelt, Donald W.
    Gray, Richard J.
    Hunt, Katie
    Conners, Amy
    Weinshilboum, Richard
    Wang, Liewei
    Boughey, Judy C.
    JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2017, 109 (07):
  • [44] Patient-derived tumor xenografts of lymphoproliferative disorders: are they surrogates for the human disease?
    Pizzi, Marco
    Inghirami, Giorgio
    CURRENT OPINION IN HEMATOLOGY, 2017, 24 (04) : 384 - 392
  • [45] Patient-Derived Tumor Xenografts: Transforming Clinical Samples into Mouse Models
    Siolas, Despina
    Hannon, Gregory J.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 73 (17) : 5315 - 5319
  • [46] Generation of orthotopic patient-derived xenografts from gastrointestinal stromal tumor
    Sicklick, Jason K.
    Leonard, Stephanie Y.
    Babicky, Michele L.
    Tang, Chih-Min
    Mose, Evangeline S.
    French, Randall P.
    Jaquish, Dawn V.
    Hoh, Carl K.
    Peterson, Michael
    Schwab, Richard
    Lowy, Andrew M.
    JOURNAL OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2014, 12
  • [47] Patient-Derived Xenografts Undergo Mouse-Specific Tumor Evolution
    Muller, Elmi
    Adigbli, George
    Issa, Fadi
    TRANSPLANTATION, 2018, 102 (02) : 179 - 182
  • [48] Patient-derived xenografts undergo mouse-specific tumor evolution
    Ben-David, Uri
    Ha, Gavin
    Tseng, Yuen-Yi
    Greenwald, Noah F.
    Oh, Coyin
    Shih, Juliann
    McFarland, James M.
    Wong, Bang
    Boehm, Jesse S.
    Beroukhim, Rameen
    Golub, Todd R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 78 (13)
  • [49] The Promise of Patient-Derived Xenografts: The Best Laid Plans of Mice and Men
    Kopetz, Scott
    Lemos, Robert
    Powis, Garth
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2012, 18 (19) : 5160 - 5162
  • [50] Patient-derived breast tumor xenografts facilitating personalized cancer therapy
    Landis, Melissa D.
    Lehmann, Brian D.
    Pietenpol, Jennifer A.
    Chang, Jenny C.
    BREAST CANCER RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (01)