Patient Characteristics Associated with Growth of Patient-Derived Tumor Implants in Mice (Patient-Derived Xenografts)

被引:0
|
作者
Guerrero, Tatiana Hernandez [1 ]
Banos, Natalia [2 ]
Nevado, Laura del Puerto [3 ]
Mahillo-Fernandez, Ignacio [2 ,3 ]
De-Speville, Bernard Doger [2 ]
Calvo, Emiliano [4 ]
Wick, Michael [5 ]
Garcia-Foncillas, Jesus [2 ,3 ]
Moreno, Victor [2 ]
机构
[1] START Barcelona HM Nou Delfos, Avinguda Vallcarca 151, Barcelona 08023, Spain
[2] START Madrid Fdn Jimenez Diaz Univ Hosp, Ave Reyes Catolicos 2, Madrid 28040, Spain
[3] IIS Fdn Jimenez Diaz UAM, Translat Oncol Div, Madrid 28040, Spain
[4] START Madrid CIOCC HM Sanchinarro, C Ona 10, Madrid 28050, Spain
[5] XENOStart START San Antonio, 4383 Med Dr, San Antonio, TX 78229 USA
关键词
patient-derived xenografts; PDX; mice; models; translational; prediction; engraftment; tumor growth; cancer; oncology; preclinical; SERUM LACTATE-DEHYDROGENASE; MISMATCH REPAIR DEFICIENCY; NUDE-MICE; OVARIAN-CANCER; LUNG CANCERS; CELL-LINES; MODELS; ESTABLISHMENT; SURVIVAL; TRANSPLANTATION;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15225402
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: patient-derived xenografts (PDXs) have defined the field of translational cancer research in recent years, becoming one of the most-used tools in early drug development. The process of establishing cancer models in mice has turned out to be challenging, since little research focuses on evaluating which factors impact engraftment success. We sought to determine the clinical, pathological, or molecular factors which may predict better engraftment rates in PDXs. Methods: between March 2017 and January 2021, tumor samples obtained from patients with primary or metastatic cancer were implanted into athymic nude mice. A full comprehensive evaluation of baseline factors associated with the patients and patients' tumors was performed, with the goal of potentially identifying predictive markers of engraftment. We focused on clinical (patient factors) pathological (patients' tumor samples) and molecular (patients' tumor samples) characteristics, analyzed either by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or next-generation sequencing (NGS), which were associated with the likelihood of final engraftment, as well as with tumor growth rates in xenografts. Results: a total of 585 tumor samples were collected and implanted. Twenty-one failed to engraft, due to lack of malignant cells. Of 564 tumor-positive samples, 187 (33.2%) grew at time of analysis. The study was able to find correlation and predictive value for engraftment for the following: the use of systemic antibiotics by the patient within 2 weeks of sampling (38.1% (72/189) antibiotics- group vs. 30.7% (115/375) no-antibiotics) (p = 0.048), and the administration of systemic steroids to the patients within 2 weeks of sampling (41.5% (34/48) steroids vs. 31.7% (153/329), no-steroids) (p = 0.049). Regarding patient's baseline tests, we found certain markers could help predict final engraftment success: for lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, 34.1% (140/411) of tumors derived from patients with baseline blood LDH levels above the upper limit of normality (ULN) achieved growth, against 30.7% (47/153) with normal LDH (p = 0.047). Histological tumor characteristics, such as grade of differentiation, were also correlated. Grade 1: 25.4% (47/187), grade 2: 34.8% (65/187) and grade 3: 40.1% (75/187) tumors achieved successful growth (p = 0.043), suggesting the higher the grade, the higher the likelihood of success. Similarly, higher ki67 levels were also correlated with better engraftment rates: low (Ki67 < 15%): 8.9% (9/45) achieved growth vs. high (Ki67 >= 15%): 31% (35/113) (p: 0.002). Other markers of aggressiveness such as the presence of lymphovascular invasion in tumor sample of origin was also predictive: 42.2% (97/230) with lymphovascular vs. 26.9% (90/334) of samples with no invasion (p = 0.0001). From the molecular standpoint, mismatch-repair-deficient (MMRd) tumors showed better engraftment rates: 62.1% (18/29) achieved growth vs. 40.8% (75/184) of proficient tumors (p = 0.026). A total of 84 PDX were breast models, among which 57.9% (11/19) ER-negative models grew, vs. 15.4% (10/65) of ER-positive models (p = 0.0001), also consonant with ER-negative tumors being more aggressive. BRAFmut cancers are more likely to achieve engraftment during the development of PDX models. Lastly, tumor growth rates during first passages can help establish a cutoff point for the decision-making process during PDX development, since the higher the tumor grades, the higher the likelihood of success. Conclusions: tumors with higher grade and Ki67 protein expression, lymphovascular and/or perineural invasion, with dMMR and are negative for ER expression have a higher probability of achieving growth in the process of PDX development. The use of steroids and/or antibiotics in the patient prior to sampling can also impact the likelihood of success in PDX development. Lastly, establishing a cutoff point for tumor growth rates could guide the decision-making process during PDX development.
引用
收藏
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Establishment of patient-derived xenografts in penile cancer
    Segarra, Luis A.
    Zacharias, Niki M.
    Pieretti, Alberto
    Alaniz, Angelita
    Maity, Tapati
    Martinez, Sue
    Rao, Priya
    Fowlkes, Natalie
    Chahoud, Jad
    Lu, Xin
    Ferrer, Magaly Martinez
    Wood, Christopher
    Pettaway, Curtis
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2022, 82 (12)
  • [22] Angiogenesis in patient-derived xenografts of odontogenic myxoma
    de Souza, Juliana Cristina
    Bastos, Victor Coutinho
    Pereira, Nubia Braga
    Martins Dias, Adriana Abalen
    de Avelar, Gleide Fernandes
    Gomez, Ricardo Santiago
    Gomes, Carolina Cavalieri
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2022, 103 (02) : 65 - 69
  • [23] An immunocompromised zebrafish to test patient-derived xenografts
    Neff, Ellen P.
    LAB ANIMAL, 2019, 48 (07) : 202 - 202
  • [24] A Biobank of Colorectal Cancer Patient-Derived Xenografts
    Abdirahman, Suad M.
    Christie, Michael
    Preaudet, Adele
    Burstroem, Marie C. U.
    Mouradov, Dmitri
    Lee, Belinda
    Sieber, Oliver M.
    Putoczki, Tracy L.
    CANCERS, 2020, 12 (09) : 1 - 19
  • [25] The proteomic characterization of HNSCC patient-derived xenografts
    Li, Hua
    Wheeler, Sarah E.
    Park, Yongseok
    Ju, Zhenlin
    Egloff, Ann Marie
    Fichera, Michele
    Thomas, Sufi
    Mills, Gordon B.
    Grandis, Jennifer R.
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2015, 75
  • [26] Detection of mouse viruses in patient-derived xenografts
    Le Bras, Alexandrai
    LAB ANIMAL, 2021, 50 (05) : 119 - 119
  • [27] Assessing therapy response in patient-derived xenografts
    Ortmann, Janosch
    Rampasek, Ladislav
    Tai, Elijah
    Mer, Arvind Singh
    Shi, Ruoshi
    Stewart, Erin L.
    Mascaux, Celine
    Fares, Aline
    Pham, Nhu-An
    Beri, Gangesh
    Eeles, Christopher
    Tkachuk, Denis
    Ho, Chantal
    Sakashita, Shingo
    Weiss, Jessica
    Jiang, Xiaoqian
    Liu, Geoffrey
    Cescon, David W.
    O'Brien, Catherine A.
    Guo, Sheng
    Tsao, Ming-Sound
    Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
    Goldenberg, Anna
    SCIENCE TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2021, 13 (620)
  • [28] Integrative Pharmacogenomics Analysis of Patient-Derived Xenografts
    Mer, Arvind S.
    Ba-Alawi, Wail
    Smirnov, Petr
    Wang, Yi X.
    Brew, Ben
    Ortmann, Janosch
    Tsao, Ming-Sound
    Cescon, David W.
    Goldenberg, Anna
    Haibe-Kains, Benjamin
    CANCER RESEARCH, 2019, 79 (17) : 4539 - 4550
  • [29] Patient-derived xenografts of a case of ameloblastic fibrodentinoma
    Pereira, Nubia B.
    de Souza, Juliana C.
    Bastos, Victor C.
    Fonseca, Felipe P.
    de Avelar, Gleide F.
    Castro, Wagner H.
    Dias, Adriana A. M.
    Mosqueda-Taylor, Adalberto
    Gomez, Ricardo S.
    Gomes, Carolina C.
    ORAL DISEASES, 2019, 25 (04) : 1229 - 1233
  • [30] Patient-derived xenografts as preclinical neuroblastoma models
    Braekeveldt, Noemie
    Bexell, Daniel
    CELL AND TISSUE RESEARCH, 2018, 372 (02) : 233 - 243