The costs of collaborative innovation

被引:62
|
作者
Vivona, Roberto [1 ]
Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif [2 ]
Audretsch, David B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nord Univ, Business Sch, Bodo, Norway
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Inst Dev Strategies, Bloomington, IN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 2023年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
Collaborative innovation; Cross-sectoral collaboration; Transaction cost economics; Game theory; Knowledge-based view; Governance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC-SECTOR INNOVATION; COORDINATION COSTS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; QUADRUPLE HELIX; VALUE CREATION; COOPERATION; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-022-09933-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Collaborations between actors from different sectors (governments, firms, nonprofit organizations, universities, and other societal groups) have been promoted or mandated with increasing frequency to spur more innovative activities. This article argues that there is an essential gap in evaluating the issues of these collaborative arrangements on innovation and a need to theorize the costs of these arrangements systematically. This article identifies three implicit assumptions in current research that prevent a sound analysis of the costs of collaborative innovation and advances a new cost theory based on the integration of studies from several research fields and explanations provided by three main economic theories: transaction cost economics, game theory, and the knowledge-based view. In particular, four overarching factors are posited to impact the effectiveness of collaboration for innovation: governance (the number of collaborators and the hierarchical relationships among them); compactness (the degree of relationship formality that binds collaborators together); reliability (the quality of the relationships); and institutionalization (the extent to which the relationships have been pre-established by practice). We discuss the importance of leveraging these factors to determine an optimal governance structure that allows collaborating actors to minimize transaction, cooperation, and knowledge costs, and to reward participants proportionally to the cost they bear, in order to foster conditions of reciprocity, fair rates of exchange, and distributive justice.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 899
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Subway, Collaborative Matching, and Innovation
    Koh, Yumi
    Li, Jing
    Xu, Jianhuan
    REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 2025, 107 (02) : 476 - 493
  • [32] Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
    Wilson, William A.
    SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 2020, 57 (03): : 399 - 400
  • [33] Innovation management in collaborative partnerships
    Tarba, Shlomo Y.
    Bauer, Florian
    Weber, Yaakov
    Matzler, Kurt
    R & D MANAGEMENT, 2019, 49 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [34] A Process for Innovation in a Collaborative Network
    Ebecken, Nelson
    JOURNAL OF INFORMATION & KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 10 (02) : 183 - 192
  • [35] Towards a Collaborative Innovation Catalyst
    Bellandi, Valerio
    Ceravolo, Paolo
    Damiani, Ernesto
    Frati, Fulvio
    Maggesi, Jonatan
    8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SIGNAL IMAGE TECHNOLOGY & INTERNET BASED SYSTEMS (SITIS 2012), 2012, : 637 - 643
  • [36] Cities as Collaborative Innovation Platforms
    Tukiainen, Taina
    Leminen, Seppo
    Westerlund, Mika
    TECHNOLOGY INNOVATION MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2015, : 16 - 23
  • [37] CRITICAL PEDAGOGIES FOR COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION
    Moriarty, Sarah
    Spruce, Jon
    Mathai, Samsom
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ENGINEERING AND PRODUCT DESIGN EDUCATION, E&PDE 2023, 2023, 123 : 301 - 306
  • [38] COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION: a tool for competitiveness
    Iriondo Astigorraga, Tomas
    DYNA, 2009, 84 (06): : 461 - 462
  • [39] Collaborative innovation in ubiquitous systems
    Veronica Serrano
    Thomas Fischer
    Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 2007, 18 : 599 - 615
  • [40] Building collaborative innovation capability
    Swink, M
    RESEARCH-TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT, 2006, 49 (02) : 37 - 47