The costs of collaborative innovation

被引:62
|
作者
Vivona, Roberto [1 ]
Demircioglu, Mehmet Akif [2 ]
Audretsch, David B. [3 ]
机构
[1] Nord Univ, Business Sch, Bodo, Norway
[2] Natl Univ Singapore, Lee Kuan Yew Sch Publ Policy, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Indiana Univ, Sch Publ & Environm Affairs, Inst Dev Strategies, Bloomington, IN USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER | 2023年 / 48卷 / 03期
关键词
Collaborative innovation; Cross-sectoral collaboration; Transaction cost economics; Game theory; Knowledge-based view; Governance; RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; PUBLIC-SECTOR INNOVATION; COORDINATION COSTS; ABSORPTIVE-CAPACITY; QUADRUPLE HELIX; VALUE CREATION; COOPERATION; GOVERNANCE; PERFORMANCE; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s10961-022-09933-1
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Collaborations between actors from different sectors (governments, firms, nonprofit organizations, universities, and other societal groups) have been promoted or mandated with increasing frequency to spur more innovative activities. This article argues that there is an essential gap in evaluating the issues of these collaborative arrangements on innovation and a need to theorize the costs of these arrangements systematically. This article identifies three implicit assumptions in current research that prevent a sound analysis of the costs of collaborative innovation and advances a new cost theory based on the integration of studies from several research fields and explanations provided by three main economic theories: transaction cost economics, game theory, and the knowledge-based view. In particular, four overarching factors are posited to impact the effectiveness of collaboration for innovation: governance (the number of collaborators and the hierarchical relationships among them); compactness (the degree of relationship formality that binds collaborators together); reliability (the quality of the relationships); and institutionalization (the extent to which the relationships have been pre-established by practice). We discuss the importance of leveraging these factors to determine an optimal governance structure that allows collaborating actors to minimize transaction, cooperation, and knowledge costs, and to reward participants proportionally to the cost they bear, in order to foster conditions of reciprocity, fair rates of exchange, and distributive justice.
引用
收藏
页码:873 / 899
页数:27
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Human Interaction and Collaborative Innovation
    Clark, Kevin A.
    HUMAN CENTERED DESIGN (HCD), 2011, 6776 : 13 - 21
  • [23] Towards a framework for collaborative innovation
    Duin, Heiko
    Jaskov, Jacob
    Hesmer, Alexander
    Thoben, Klaus-Dieter
    COMPUTER-AIDED INNOVATION (CAI), 2008, 277 : 193 - +
  • [24] An analytical framework of collaborative innovation
    Li Changhong
    Zhang Xiaoyun
    Liang Jiahua
    ADVANCES IN MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGY, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 116 - 122
  • [25] Collaborative innovation in hospitality and tourism
    Morvillo, Alfonso
    Marasco, Alessandra
    De Martino, Marcella
    Hon, Alice H. Y.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT, 2018, 30 (06) : 2362 - 2363
  • [26] Collaborative innovation blocs and antifragility
    Elert, Niklas
    Henrekson, Magnus
    JOURNAL OF INSTITUTIONAL ECONOMICS, 2020, 16 (04) : 537 - 552
  • [27] Collaborative Learning for Innovation Education
    Sandland, Jessica G.
    Wankerl, Andreas
    Terminel, Alejandra Quintanilla
    Capetillo, Azael Jesus Cortes
    Flores, Diana Salinas
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE GLOBAL ENGINEERING EDUCATION CONFERENCE (EDUCON 2020), 2020, : 630 - 637
  • [28] COLLABORATIVE INNOVATION: A TECHNOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVE
    Pigola, Angelica
    da Costa, Priscila Rezende
    Mazieri, Marcos Rogerio
    Scafuto, Isabel Cristina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INNOVATION, 2022, 10 (02): : 204 - 211
  • [29] Collaborative Innovation in the Public Sector
    Park, Chul Hyun
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2018, 28 (02) : 293 - 295
  • [30] Special issue on Collaborative Innovation
    Mendibil, Kepa
    Bititci, Umit
    Smith, Marisa
    Wang, Dan
    PRODUCTION PLANNING & CONTROL, 2013, 24 (2-3) : 143 - 144