Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis

被引:8
|
作者
Climent, Maria Teresa [1 ,2 ]
Serra, Anna [1 ,2 ]
Llueca, Maria [3 ]
Llueca, Antoni [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Gen Hosp Castellon, Dept Obstet & Gynaecol, Multidisciplinary Unit Abdominopelv Oncol Surg MUA, Castellon de La Plana 12004, Spain
[2] Univ Jaume I UJI, Dept Med, Oncol Surg Res Grp OSRG, Castellon de La Plana 12004, Spain
[3] Univ CEU Cardenal Herrera, Dept Med, Castellon de La Plana 12006, Spain
关键词
secondary cytoreductive surgery; recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer; overall survival; disease-free survival; systematic revision; meta-analysis; SECONDARY CYTOREDUCTIVE SURGERY; OPEN-LABEL; CHEMOTHERAPY; MULTICENTER; BEVACIZUMAB; SURVIVAL; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3390/cancers15133470
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate of any type of gynecological cancer because it is diagnosed in advanced stages and its recurrence rate is about 80%. The standard treatment for recurrences of ovarian cancer is systemic chemotherapy. Secondary cytoreductive surgery may be a treatment option for selected patients. We evaluated three randomized studies to determine the effect on overall survival and disease-free survival. This analysis shows better results in this group than in the patients who were treated with chemotherapy alone, with statistically significant differences. This benefit is maintained when analyzing patients in whom complete cytoreduction is achieved. The main limitation of the selected studies is the different criteria for selecting patients for secondary cytoreduction, which is why prospective studies are needed to determine which patients will benefit from this treatment. Background: The second cytoreductive surgery performed for a patient who has recurrent ovarian cancer remains controversial. Our study analyzes overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) for cytoreductive surgery in addition to chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer instead of chemotherapy alone. Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted using PubMed and the Cochrane database of systematic reviews to select randomized controlled studies. In total, three randomized studies were used, employing a total of 1249 patients. Results: The results of our meta-analysis of these randomized controlled trials identified significant differences in OS (HR = 0.83, IC 95% 0.70-0.99, p < 0.04) and DFS (HR = 0.63, IC 95% 0.55-0.72, p < 0.000001). A subgroup analysis comparing complete cytoreductive surgery and surgery with residual tumor achieved better results for both OS (HR = 0.65, IC 95% 0.49-0.86, p = 0.002) and DFS (HR = 0.67, IC 95% 0.53-0.82, p = 0.0008), with statistical significance. Conclusions: A complete secondary cytoreductive surgery (SCS) in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) demonstrates an improvement in the OS and DFS, and this benefit is most evident in cases where complete cytoreductive surgery is achieved. The challenge is the correct patient selection for secondary cytoreductive surgery to improve the results of this approach.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Splenectomy as a part of cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yisi
    Chen, Yali
    Qin, Zhaojuan
    Chen, Mengmeng
    Zheng, Ai
    Han, Ling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (07) : 1070 - 1076
  • [22] Morbidity and mortality in women with advanced ovarian cancer who underwent primary cytoreductive surgery compared to cytoreductive surgery for recurrent disease: a meta-analysis
    Bartels, Helena C.
    Rogers, Ailin C.
    Postle, James
    Shields, Conor
    Mulsow, Jurgen
    Conneely, John
    Brennan, Donal J.
    PLEURA AND PERITONEUM, 2019, 4 (02)
  • [23] Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer
    Gangadharan, Chitrathara
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2009, 30 (05) : 27 - 27
  • [24] Surgery in recurrent ovarian cancer
    Sehouli, Jalid
    Grabowski, Jacek P.
    CANCER, 2019, 125 : 4598 - 4601
  • [25] Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer
    Rose, PG
    SEMINARS IN ONCOLOGY, 2000, 27 (03) : 17 - 23
  • [26] Surgery for recurrent ovarian cancer
    Heitz, Florian
    du Bois, Andreas
    Kurzeder, Christian
    Pfisterer, Jacobus
    Barinoff, Jana
    Grabowski, Jacek
    Hilpert, Felix
    Mahner, Sven
    Harter, Philipp
    WOMENS HEALTH, 2011, 7 (05) : 529 - 535
  • [27] Asbestos Exposure and Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-analysis
    Kim, Seo Young
    Chang, Ha Kyun
    Kwon, Ohwi
    Park, Jaeyoung
    Myong, Jun-Pyo
    SAFETY AND HEALTH AT WORK, 2024, 15 (01) : 1 - 8
  • [28] Breastfeeding and the Risk of Ovarian Cancer: A Meta-Analysis
    Feng, Li-Ping
    Chen, Hong-Lin
    Shen, Mei-Yun
    JOURNAL OF MIDWIFERY & WOMENS HEALTH, 2014, 59 (04) : 428 - 437
  • [29] Comparison of efficacy of robotic surgery, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in the treatment of ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis
    Shi, Can
    Gao, Yingchun
    Yang, Yijun
    Zhang, Lei
    Yu, Juanpeng
    Zhang, Ting
    WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2019, 17 (01)
  • [30] Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea
    Yu Wang
    Susan McGorray
    Mohammed D. Saleem
    Semiramis L. Carbajal Mamani
    Ariel F. Pomputius
    Merry-Jennifer Markham
    Jacqueline C. Castagno
    Journal of Robotic Surgery, 2019, 13 : 23 - 33