Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea
Yu Wang
Susan McGorray
Mohammed D. Saleem
Semiramis L. Carbajal Mamani
Ariel F. Pomputius
Merry-Jennifer Markham
Jacqueline C. Castagno
机构
[1] University of Florida College of Medicine,Division Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] University of Florida College of Medicine,Department of Biostatistics
[3] University of Florida College of Medicine,Department of Medicine
[4] University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries,undefined
来源
关键词
Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Ovarian cancer; Cytoreductive surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in other gynecologic cancers has shown benefits with similar oncologic outcomes. However, the biology and complexity of surgery for ovarian cancer may preclude this approach for ovarian cancer patients. Our objective is to assess feasibility to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer patients via minimally invasive surgery. Our data sources include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biosis, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model with DerSimonian and Laird estimator for the amount of heterogeneity to estimate the pooled outcomes. A funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to test publication bias. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. There were 6 studies (3 prospective, 3 retrospective) that met the criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 3231 patients, 567 were in the minimally invasive group and 2664 in the laparotomy group. Both groups were similar in stage and serous histology. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 74.50% (95% CI 40.41–97.65%) and 53.10% (95% CI 4.88–97.75%) of patients in the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between these 2 pooled proportions (p = 0.52). Three studies compared minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in obtaining complete cytoreductive surgery [OR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.70–1.16; p = 0.43)]. A symmetrical funnel plot indicated no publication bias. The pooled proportion for grade > 2 postoperative complications was not significant among the laparoscopy group [3.11% (95% CI 0.00–10.24%; p = 0.15)]. Complete cytoreductive surgery appears feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery in selected advanced ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel
    Wang, Yu
    McGorray, Susan
    Saleem, Mohammed D.
    Mamani, Semiramis L. Carbajal
    Pomputius, Ariel F.
    Markham, Merry-Jennifer
    Castagno, Jacqueline C.
    JOURNAL OF ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2019, 13 (01) : 23 - 33
  • [2] Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    Melamed, Alexander
    Eisenhauer, Eric L.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2024, 129 (01) : 126 - 127
  • [3] The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Knisely, Anne
    Gamble, Charlotte R.
    St Clair, Caryn M.
    Hou, June Y.
    Khoury-Collado, Fady
    Gockley, Allison A.
    Wright, Jason D.
    Melamed, Alexander
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 537 - 543
  • [4] Splenectomy as a part of cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yisi
    Chen, Yali
    Qin, Zhaojuan
    Chen, Mengmeng
    Zheng, Ai
    Han, Ling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGICAL CANCER, 2024, 34 (07) : 1070 - 1076
  • [5] Minimally invasive approach for interval cytoreductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
    McNamara, Blair
    Guerra, Rosa Alisa
    Craig, Amaranta D.
    Chen, Lee-may
    Chapman, Jocelyn S.
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2020, 159 (02) : E30 - E30
  • [6] Regarding "The Role of Minimally Invasive Surgery in the Care of Women with Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis"
    Yu, Xiuli
    Pu, Li
    Xu, Zhaoning
    Yu, Tingting
    Sun, Hairui
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2022, 29 (10) : 1197 - 1197
  • [7] The Role of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Marchetti, Claudia
    Fagotti, Anna
    Fp, Vincenzo Tombolini
    Fp, Giovanni Scambia
    De Felice, Francesca
    ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2021, 28 (06) : 3258 - 3263
  • [8] The Role of Secondary Cytoreductive Surgery in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Claudia Marchetti
    Anna Fagotti
    Vincenzo Tombolini
    Giovanni Scambia
    Francesca De Felice
    Annals of Surgical Oncology, 2021, 28 : 3258 - 3263
  • [9] Minimally invasive cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Dieberg, Gudrun
    Smart, Neil A.
    King, Nicola
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 223 : 554 - 560
  • [10] Efficacy and safety of minimally invasive surgery versus open laparotomy for epithelial ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Yokoi, Akira
    Machida, Hiroko
    Shimada, Muneaki
    Mastuo, Koji
    Shigeta, Shogo
    Furukawa, Shigenori
    Nishikawa, Nobumichi
    Nomura, Hiroyuki
    Hori, Kensuke
    Tokunaga, Hideki
    Shoji, Tadahiro
    Baba, Tsukasa
    Nagase, Satoru
    GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2024, 190 : 42 - 52