Minimally invasive interval cytoreductive surgery in ovarian cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
|
作者
Joel Cardenas-Goicoechea
Yu Wang
Susan McGorray
Mohammed D. Saleem
Semiramis L. Carbajal Mamani
Ariel F. Pomputius
Merry-Jennifer Markham
Jacqueline C. Castagno
机构
[1] University of Florida College of Medicine,Division Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] University of Florida College of Medicine,Department of Biostatistics
[3] University of Florida College of Medicine,Department of Medicine
[4] University of Florida Health Science Center Libraries,undefined
来源
关键词
Laparoscopy; Robotic surgery; Ovarian cancer; Cytoreductive surgery; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The introduction of minimally invasive surgery in other gynecologic cancers has shown benefits with similar oncologic outcomes. However, the biology and complexity of surgery for ovarian cancer may preclude this approach for ovarian cancer patients. Our objective is to assess feasibility to achieve complete cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage IIIC–IV ovarian cancer patients via minimally invasive surgery. Our data sources include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Biosis, Clinicaltrials.gov, and the Cochrane Library. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model with DerSimonian and Laird estimator for the amount of heterogeneity to estimate the pooled outcomes. A funnel plot and Egger’s regression test were used to test publication bias. The Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale was used to assess the quality of the studies. There were 6 studies (3 prospective, 3 retrospective) that met the criteria for meta-analysis with a total of 3231 patients, 567 were in the minimally invasive group and 2664 in the laparotomy group. Both groups were similar in stage and serous histology. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved in 74.50% (95% CI 40.41–97.65%) and 53.10% (95% CI 4.88–97.75%) of patients in the minimally invasive and laparotomy groups, respectively. There was no statistical significant difference between these 2 pooled proportions (p = 0.52). Three studies compared minimally invasive surgery vs laparotomy. No significant difference was observed between the 2 groups in obtaining complete cytoreductive surgery [OR = 0.90 (95% CI 0.70–1.16; p = 0.43)]. A symmetrical funnel plot indicated no publication bias. The pooled proportion for grade > 2 postoperative complications was not significant among the laparoscopy group [3.11% (95% CI 0.00–10.24%; p = 0.15)]. Complete cytoreductive surgery appears feasible and safe with minimally invasive surgery in selected advanced ovarian cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 33
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [22] Minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kamper, Steven J.
    Ostelo, Raymond W. J. G.
    Rubinstein, Sidney M.
    Nellensteijn, Jorm M.
    Peul, Wilco C.
    Arts, Mark P.
    van Tulder, Maurits W.
    EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2014, 23 (05) : 1021 - 1043
  • [23] Effects of CytoReductive surgery plus hyperthermic IntraPEritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) versus CytoReductive surgery for ovarian cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Yizi
    Ren, Fang
    Chen, Peng
    Liu, Shuang
    Song, Zixuan
    Ma, Xiaoxin
    EJSO, 2019, 45 (03): : 301 - 309
  • [24] Survival impact and safety of intrathoracic and abdominopelvic cytoreductive surgery in advanced ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jiaxi
    Wang, Xingyu
    Yin, Wanjun
    Zhang, Shiqian
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2024, 14
  • [25] Hyper:thermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) and cytoreductive surgery (CRS) in ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Huo, Y. R.
    Richards, A.
    Liauw, W.
    Morris, D. L.
    EJSO, 2015, 41 (12): : 1578 - 1589
  • [26] Epithelial ovarian cancers and minimally invasive cytoreductive surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: A systematic review
    Achen, G.
    Koual, M.
    Bentivegna, E.
    Fournier, L.
    Xuan, H. -T. Nguyen
    Delanoy, N.
    Bats, A. -S.
    Azais, H.
    GYNECOLOGIE OBSTETRIQUE FERTILITE & SENOLOGIE, 2021, 49 (10): : 736 - 743
  • [27] Three and Five-Year Mortality in Ovarian Cancer after Minimally Invasive Compared to Open Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Jochum, Floriane
    Vermel, Muriel
    Faller, Emilie
    Boisrame, Thomas
    Lecointre, Lise
    Akladios, Cherif
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2020, 9 (08) : 1 - 18
  • [28] Minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Biere, S. S. A. Y.
    Cuesta, M. A.
    Van Der Peet, D. L.
    MINERVA CHIRURGICA, 2009, 64 (02) : 121 - 133
  • [29] Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
    Smith, Anna Jo Bodurtha
    Jones, Tiffany Nicole
    Miao, Diana
    Fader, Amanda Nickles
    JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2021, 28 (03) : 544 - U60
  • [30] Minimally Invasive Methods for Staging in Lung Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Labarca, Gonzalo
    Aravena, Carlos
    Ortega, Francisco
    Arenas, Alex
    Majid, Adnan
    Folch, Erik
    Mehta, Hiren J.
    Jantz, Michael A.
    Fernandez-Bussy, Sebastian
    PULMONARY MEDICINE, 2016, 2016