Radiologists' performance in reading digital breast tomosynthesis with and without synthesized views for cancer detection

被引:0
|
作者
Trieu, Phuong Dung [1 ]
Noakes, Jennie [1 ,2 ]
Li, Tong [1 ]
Borecky, Natacha [1 ,3 ]
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Barron, Melissa L. [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Med & Hlth, Discipline Med Imaging Sci, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
[2] BreastScreen New South Wales, Level 6,Community Serv Bldg,Herbert St, St Leonards, NSW, Australia
[3] BreastScreen New South Wales North Coast, POB 1098, Lismore, NSW, Australia
来源
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY | 2023年 / 96卷 / 1145期
关键词
RECONSTRUCTED PROJECTION IMAGES; MAMMOGRAPHY; POPULATION; DBT;
D O I
10.1259/bjr.20220704
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: The study aims to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of radiologists and radiology trainees in digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) alone vs DBT plus synthe-sized view (SV) for an understanding of the adequacy of DBT images to identify cancer lesions.Methods: Fifty -five observers (30 radiologists and 25 radiology trainees) participated in reading a set of 35 cases (15 cancer) with 28 readers reading DBT and 27 readers reading DBT plus SV. Two groups of readers had similar experience in interpreting mammograms. The performances of participants in each reading mode were compared with the ground truth and calculated in term of specificity, sensitivity, and ROC AUC. The cancer detection rate in various levels of breast density, lesion types and lesion sizes between 'DBT' and 'DBT + SV' were also analyzed. The difference in diagnostic accuracy of readers between two reading modes was assessed using Man-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 indicated a significant result.Results: There was no significant difference in specificity (0.67-vs-0.65; p = 0.69), sensitivity (0.77-vs-0.71; p = 0.09), ROC AUC (0.77-vs-0.73; p = 0.19) of radiologists reading DBT plus SV compared with radiologists reading DBT. Similar result was found in radiology trainees with no significant difference in specificity (0.70-vs-0.63; p = 0.29), sensitivity (0.44-vs-0.55; p = 0.19), ROC AUC (0.59-vs-0.62; p = 0.60) between two reading modes. Radiologists and trainees obtained similar results in two reading modes for cancer detection rate with different levels of breast density, cancer types and sizes of lesions (p > 0.05).Conclusion: Findings show that the diagnostic perfor-mances of radiologists and radiology trainees in DBT alone and DBT plus SV were equivalent in identifying cancer and normal cases. Advances in knowledge: DBT alone had equivalent diag-nostic accuracy as DBT plus SV which could imply the consideration of using DBT as a sole modality without SV.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Impact of AI for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Detection and Interpretation Time
    Park, Eun Kyung
    Kwak, SooYoung
    Lee, Weonsuk
    Choi, Joon Suk
    Kooi, Thijs
    Kim, Eun-Kyung
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (03)
  • [32] False-Negative Rates of Breast Cancer Screening with and without Digital Breast Tomosynthesis
    Durand, Melissa A.
    Friedewald, Sarah M.
    Plecha, Donna M.
    Copit, Debra S.
    Barke, Lora D.
    Rose, Stephen L.
    Hayes, Mary K.
    Greer, Linda N.
    Dabbous, Firas M.
    Conant, Emily F.
    RADIOLOGY, 2021, 298 (02) : 296 - 305
  • [33] Breast Cancer Screening with Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Improves Performance of Mammography Screening
    Bae, Min Sun
    Seo, Bo Kyoung
    RADIOLOGY, 2023, 307 (03)
  • [34] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Skaane, Per
    BREAST CANCER, 2017, 24 (01) : 32 - 41
  • [35] Breast cancer screening with digital breast tomosynthesis
    Per Skaane
    Breast Cancer, 2017, 24 : 32 - 41
  • [36] Impact of a Categorical AI System for Digital Breast Tomosynthesis on Breast Cancer Interpretation by Both General Radiologists and Breast Imaging Specialists
    Kim, Jiye G.
    Haslam, Bryan
    Diab, Abdul Rahman
    Sakhare, Ashwin
    Grisot, Giorgia
    Lee, Hyunkwang
    Holt, Jacqueline
    Lee, Christoph I.
    Lotter, William
    Sorensen, A. Gregory
    RADIOLOGY-ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE, 2024, 6 (02)
  • [37] Performance evaluation of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer using pathology as gold standard: an institutional experience
    Joshi, Pranjali
    Singh, Neha
    Raj, Gaurav
    Singh, Ragini
    Malhotra, Kiran Preet
    Awasthi, Namrata Punit
    EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2022, 53 (01):
  • [38] Performance evaluation of digital mammography, digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasound in the detection of breast cancer using pathology as gold standard: an institutional experience
    Pranjali Joshi
    Neha Singh
    Gaurav Raj
    Ragini Singh
    Kiran Preet Malhotra
    Namrata Punit Awasthi
    Egyptian Journal of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, 53
  • [39] Artificial intelligence for breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis: State of the art
    Sechopoulos, Ioannis
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Mann, Ritse
    SEMINARS IN CANCER BIOLOGY, 2021, 72 : 214 - 225
  • [40] AI-enhanced Mammography With Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection: Clinical Value and Comparison With Human Performance
    Resch, Daphne
    Lo Gullo, Roberto
    Teuwen, Jonas
    Semturs, Friedrich
    Hummel, Johann
    Resch, Alexandra
    Pinker, Katja
    RADIOLOGY-IMAGING CANCER, 2024, 6 (04): : e230149