Evaluating corn production under different plant spacings through integrated modeling approach and simulating its future response under climate change scenarios

被引:5
|
作者
Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hong [1 ]
Akbar, Nadeem [2 ,3 ]
Javaid, Maria [1 ]
Rizwan, Muhammad [4 ]
Akhlaq, Muhammad [5 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Res Ctr Fluid Machinery Engn & Technol, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Water Management Res Ctr, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[4] Swedish Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
[5] Jiangsu Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
APSIM model; Climate change; Corn; Raised bed planting; GCM (general circulation model); WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; MAIZE GRAIN-YIELD; NORTH CHINA PLAIN; ZEA-MAYS L; BIAS CORRECTION; WHEAT PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEM; BRASSICA-NAPUS; CHANGE IMPACTS; LOESS PLATEAU;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108691
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The use of advanced resource conservation techniques is the need of time for higher crop production under the challenges of water scarcity and climate change. The present study was planned (1) to evaluate different plant spacing of corn, sown under raised bed planting (RBP) for higher productivity, (2) calibrate APSIM model for experimental treatments and (3) simulate future (2022-2100) crop response under different scenarios of climate change. The two-year research experiments were conducted on corn with four different plant spacings (S1:15 cm, S2:17.5 cm, S3:20 cm and S4:22.5 cm) under RBP. The crop response was evaluated in terms of leaf area index (LAI), plant height, flowering date, grains per cob, grain yield, biomass yield, harvest index (HI) and water productivity. The S1 treatment produced the highest productivity in terms of grain yield (7.16 Mg/hm2), biomass yield (16.57 Mg/hm2), HI (0.44) and water productivity (1.33 kg/m3). APSIM model was calibrated and its ability to simulate crop response during validation was confirmed from the values of RMSE, NRMSE, R2, CRM and NSE as 0.4, 0.21, 0.83, 0.04 and 0.68 for grain yield. The RMSE and NRMSE were 0.79 and 0.14 for biomass yield. The value of R2 ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, CRM from -0.03 to 0.005, NSE from 0.69 to 0.86 for biomass yield, plant height and LAI. During scenario simulations, the model run was performed against different plant spacing for optimization and results revealed that 10 cm plant spacing produced highest corn yield and growth parameters. Further simulations (2022-2100) were performed using climatic data, acquired from different general circulation model (GCMs) for two rcps (4.5 and 8.5) and results revealed the reduction in grain and biomass yields by 8-14 % and 10-28 %, respectively against different data sources (GCMs). Optimized plant spacing (10 cm) under RBP produced 35.5 % more grain yield and 29.3 % more biomass yield than that under control treatment (ridge-furrow system). Based on the research findings, it is recommended that conservation technique like RBP needs to be adopted in semi-arid regions to mitigate the impact of climate change in terms of future temperature rise for better corn production.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Predicting changes in yield and water use in the production of corn in the United States under climate change scenarios
    Johnston, Ryan Z.
    Sandefur, Heather N.
    Bandekar, Prathamesh
    Matlock, Marty D.
    Haggard, Brian E.
    Thoma, Greg
    ECOLOGICAL ENGINEERING, 2015, 82 : 555 - 565
  • [22] Modeling the Potential Future Distribution of Anthrax Outbreaks under Multiple Climate Change Scenarios for Kenya
    Otieno, Fredrick Tom
    Gachohi, John
    Gikuma-Njuru, Peter
    Kariuki, Patrick
    Oyas, Harry
    Canfield, Samuel A.
    Bett, Bernard
    Njenga, Moses Kariuki
    Blackburn, Jason K.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 18 (08)
  • [23] Modeling the current distribution suitability and future dynamics of Culicoides imicola under climate change scenarios
    Gao, Hongyan
    Wang, Long
    Ma, Jun
    Gao, Xiang
    Xiao, Jianhua
    Wang, Hongbin
    PEERJ, 2021, 9
  • [24] Contemporary and future distribution patterns of fluvial vegetation under different climate change scenarios and implications for integrated water resource management
    Rocha, Joao
    Hughes, Samantha Jane
    Almeida, Paulo
    Garcia-Cabral, Isabel
    Amich, Franciso
    Crespi, Antonio L.
    ECOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2015, 30 (06) : 989 - 1003
  • [25] Future Climate Change Hotspots Under Different 21st Century Warming Scenarios
    Fan, Xuewei
    Miao, Chiyuan
    Duan, Qingyun
    Shen, Chenwei
    Wu, Yi
    EARTHS FUTURE, 2021, 9 (06)
  • [26] Evaluation of Shifts in the Potential Future Distributions of Carcharhinid Sharks Under Different Climate Change Scenarios
    Diaz-Carballido, Pedro Luis
    Mendoza-Gonzalez, Gabriela
    Yanez-Arenas, Carlos Alberto
    Chiappa-Carrara, Xavier
    FRONTIERS IN MARINE SCIENCE, 2022, 8
  • [27] Projected population dynamics for a federally endangered plant under different climate change emission scenarios
    Molano-Flores, Brenda
    Bell, Timothy J.
    BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2012, 145 (01) : 130 - 138
  • [28] Assessing sustainability of winter wheat production under climate change scenarios in a humid climate - An integrated modelling framework
    El Chami, D.
    Daccache, A.
    AGRICULTURAL SYSTEMS, 2015, 140 : 19 - 25
  • [29] Modeling the distribution of cultural ecosystem services based on future climate variables under different scenarios
    Chang You
    Hongjiao Qu
    Lun Yin
    Luo Guo
    Scientific Reports, 14 (1)
  • [30] Impact assessment of climate change on buildings in Paraguay-Overheating risk under different future climate scenarios
    Silvero, Fabiana
    Lops, Camilla
    Montelpare, Sergio
    Rodrigues, Fernanda
    BUILDING SIMULATION, 2019, 12 (06) : 943 - 960