Evaluating corn production under different plant spacings through integrated modeling approach and simulating its future response under climate change scenarios

被引:5
|
作者
Chauhdary, Junaid Nawaz [1 ,2 ]
Li, Hong [1 ]
Akbar, Nadeem [2 ,3 ]
Javaid, Maria [1 ]
Rizwan, Muhammad [4 ]
Akhlaq, Muhammad [5 ]
机构
[1] Jiangsu Univ, Res Ctr Fluid Machinery Engn & Technol, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Water Management Res Ctr, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[3] Univ Agr Faisalabad, Dept Agron, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
[4] Swedish Coll Engn & Technol, Dept Civil Engn, Rahim Yar Khan 64200, Pakistan
[5] Jiangsu Univ, Coll Agr Engn, Zhenjiang 212013, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
APSIM model; Climate change; Corn; Raised bed planting; GCM (general circulation model); WATER-USE EFFICIENCY; MAIZE GRAIN-YIELD; NORTH CHINA PLAIN; ZEA-MAYS L; BIAS CORRECTION; WHEAT PRODUCTION; CROPPING SYSTEM; BRASSICA-NAPUS; CHANGE IMPACTS; LOESS PLATEAU;
D O I
10.1016/j.agwat.2024.108691
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
The use of advanced resource conservation techniques is the need of time for higher crop production under the challenges of water scarcity and climate change. The present study was planned (1) to evaluate different plant spacing of corn, sown under raised bed planting (RBP) for higher productivity, (2) calibrate APSIM model for experimental treatments and (3) simulate future (2022-2100) crop response under different scenarios of climate change. The two-year research experiments were conducted on corn with four different plant spacings (S1:15 cm, S2:17.5 cm, S3:20 cm and S4:22.5 cm) under RBP. The crop response was evaluated in terms of leaf area index (LAI), plant height, flowering date, grains per cob, grain yield, biomass yield, harvest index (HI) and water productivity. The S1 treatment produced the highest productivity in terms of grain yield (7.16 Mg/hm2), biomass yield (16.57 Mg/hm2), HI (0.44) and water productivity (1.33 kg/m3). APSIM model was calibrated and its ability to simulate crop response during validation was confirmed from the values of RMSE, NRMSE, R2, CRM and NSE as 0.4, 0.21, 0.83, 0.04 and 0.68 for grain yield. The RMSE and NRMSE were 0.79 and 0.14 for biomass yield. The value of R2 ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, CRM from -0.03 to 0.005, NSE from 0.69 to 0.86 for biomass yield, plant height and LAI. During scenario simulations, the model run was performed against different plant spacing for optimization and results revealed that 10 cm plant spacing produced highest corn yield and growth parameters. Further simulations (2022-2100) were performed using climatic data, acquired from different general circulation model (GCMs) for two rcps (4.5 and 8.5) and results revealed the reduction in grain and biomass yields by 8-14 % and 10-28 %, respectively against different data sources (GCMs). Optimized plant spacing (10 cm) under RBP produced 35.5 % more grain yield and 29.3 % more biomass yield than that under control treatment (ridge-furrow system). Based on the research findings, it is recommended that conservation technique like RBP needs to be adopted in semi-arid regions to mitigate the impact of climate change in terms of future temperature rise for better corn production.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Evaluating the Responses of Streamflow under Future Climate Change Scenarios in a Western Indian Himalaya Watershed
    Rani, Seema
    Sreekesh, S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSES-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL, 2019, 6 (01): : 155 - 174
  • [12] Modeling future carbon stock in melon cultivation agroecosystems under different climate scenarios
    da Silva, Vanessa Coelho
    Santana, Monica da Silva
    Parente, Angelucia Goncalves
    Gondim, Rubens Sonsol
    Silveira, Cleiton da Silva
    Salviano, Alessandra Monteiro
    de Deus, Tarcisio Rocha Vicente
    Valladares, Gustavo Souza
    Giongo, Vanderlise
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE CIENCIAS AMBIENTAIS, 2024, 59
  • [13] Applying a System Dynamics Approach for Modeling Groundwater Dynamics to Depletion under Different Economical and Climate Change Scenarios
    Balali, Hamid
    Viaggi, Davide
    WATER, 2015, 7 (10): : 5258 - 5271
  • [14] Integrated GIS-based RUSLE approach for quantification of potential soil erosion under future climate change scenarios
    Behera, Madhusmita
    Sena, Dipaka R.
    Mandal, Uday
    Kashyap, Pradeep S.
    Dash, Sonam S.
    ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING AND ASSESSMENT, 2020, 192 (11)
  • [15] Integrated GIS-based RUSLE approach for quantification of potential soil erosion under future climate change scenarios
    Madhusmita Behera
    Dipaka R. Sena
    Uday Mandal
    Pradeep S. Kashyap
    Sonam S. Dash
    Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 2020, 192
  • [16] Suitability of the Amazonas region for beekeeping and its future distribution under climate change scenarios
    Gomez-Fernandez, Darwin
    Garcia, Ligia
    Silva-Lopez, Jhonsy O.
    Guevara, Jaris Veneros
    Carrion, Erick Arellanos
    Salas-Lopez, Rolando
    Gonas, Malluri
    Atalaya-Marin, Nilton
    Oliva-Cruz, Manuel
    Rojas-Briceno, Nilton B.
    ECOLOGICAL INFORMATICS, 2025, 87
  • [17] Impact assessment of climate change on buildings in Paraguay—Overheating risk under different future climate scenarios
    Fabiana Silvero
    Camilla Lops
    Sergio Montelpare
    Fernanda Rodrigues
    Building Simulation, 2019, 12 : 943 - 960
  • [18] Improving the performance of an integrated urban wastewater system under future climate change and urbanisation scenarios
    Astaraie-Imani, Maryam
    Kapelan, Zoran
    Butler, David
    JOURNAL OF WATER AND CLIMATE CHANGE, 2013, 4 (03) : 232 - 243
  • [19] Exploring the biogeophysical limits of global food production under different climate change scenarios
    de Vrese, Philipp
    Stacke, Tobias
    Hagemann, Stefan
    EARTH SYSTEM DYNAMICS, 2018, 9 (02) : 393 - 412
  • [20] Hydrological response to climate change: The Pearl River, China under different RCP scenarios
    Yan, Dan
    Werners, Saskia E.
    Ludwig, Fulco
    Huang, He Qing
    JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY-REGIONAL STUDIES, 2015, 4 : 228 - 245