Decision For The Next Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Considering Regional Operational Requirements Based on Z-Fuzzy Best-Worst Method

被引:0
|
作者
Saylam, Serhat [1 ]
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Air Force Acad, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
regional air power; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); decision analysis; Best-Worst method; z-number theory; AIRCRAFT; AHP; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/RAST57548.2023.10197893
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this study, we discuss the relationship between being a regional air power and having military unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and we explore the priorities for Turkiye's next type of UAV to be developed. The Turkish Ministry of National Defence aims to have a strong and influential armed forces that is respected and accepted as a leader in its region and beyond. This requires a large and modern Air Force. UAVs have become an essential component of air power, allowing countries to project military strength and defend their interests in the region. To determine the priority for the next type of UAV, we present six alternatives: a strategic bomber UAV, an air refueling UAV, a multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities, a UAV in the role of Command and Control functions, an airlift cargo UAV/drone, and a Combat Search & Rescue swarm of UAVs/drones. Then, we use the Best-Worst Method (BWM) with z-number theory to rank the UAV projects and technologies. The z-fuzzy BWM is employed to prioritize UAV alternatives, considering the uncertainty in decision-maker's evaluations and reliability levels. Based on the judgments of experts, the priority value of each strategy is calculated, and the most important UAV alternative is determined as the multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] A fully fuzzy best-worst multi attribute decision making method with triangular fuzzy number: A case study of maintenance assessment in the hospitals
    Karimi, Hossein
    Sadeghi-Dastaki, Mohsen
    Javan, Majid
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2020, 86 (86)
  • [42] An interval type-2 fuzzy best-worst method and likelihood-based multi-criteria method in group decision-making
    Goldani, Nastaran
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    Naji-Azimi, Zahra
    Alidadi, Hosein
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2023, 148
  • [43] A Fuzzy Extension of Simplified Best-Worst Method (F-SBWM) and Its Applications to Decision-Making Problems
    Amiri, Maghsoud
    Hashemi-Tabatabaei, Mohammad
    Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, Mehdi
    Kaklauskas, Arturas
    Zavadskas, Edmundas Kazimieras
    Antucheviciene, Jurgita
    SYMMETRY-BASEL, 2023, 15 (01):
  • [44] Generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy best-worst multiple criteria decision-making method with applications
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2020, 38 (02) : 1705 - 1719
  • [45] Evaluating Prototype Design Criteria for Human-Computer Interface Using Intuitionistic Fuzzy Z-Numbers Based Best-Worst Method
    Liu, Qinghua
    Fu, Qianwen
    Liu, Xiangyu
    INTELLIGENT AND FUZZY SYSTEMS, INFUS 2024 CONFERENCE, VOL 1, 2024, 1088 : 486 - 496
  • [46] A Consensus-Based Best-Worst Method for Multi-criteria Group Decision-Making
    Labella, Alvaro
    Garcia-Zamora, Diego
    Rodriguez, Rosa M.
    Martinez, Luis
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 48 - 58
  • [47] Identification of Agile Requirements Change Management Success Factors in Global Software Development Based on the Best-Worst Method
    Aljuhani, Abdulmajeed
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED COMPUTER SCIENCE AND APPLICATIONS, 2024, 15 (07) : 1358 - 1365
  • [48] Research on Safety Evaluation of Municipal Sewage Treatment Plant Based on Improved Best-Worst Method and Fuzzy Comprehensive Method
    Wu, Junnan
    Liu, Xin
    Pan, Dianqi
    Zhang, Yichen
    Zhang, Jiquan
    Ke, Kai
    SUSTAINABILITY, 2023, 15 (11)
  • [49] A navigational risk evaluation of ferry transport: Continuous risk management matrix based on fuzzy Best-Worst Method
    Pham, Linh Thi
    Hoang, Long Van
    PLOS ONE, 2024, 19 (09):
  • [50] Approaches for multicriteria decision-making based on the hesitant fuzzy best–worst method
    Jian Li
    Li-li Niu
    Qiongxia Chen
    Zhong-xing Wang
    Complex & Intelligent Systems, 2021, 7 : 2617 - 2634