Decision For The Next Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Considering Regional Operational Requirements Based on Z-Fuzzy Best-Worst Method

被引:0
|
作者
Saylam, Serhat [1 ]
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Air Force Acad, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
regional air power; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); decision analysis; Best-Worst method; z-number theory; AIRCRAFT; AHP; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/RAST57548.2023.10197893
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this study, we discuss the relationship between being a regional air power and having military unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and we explore the priorities for Turkiye's next type of UAV to be developed. The Turkish Ministry of National Defence aims to have a strong and influential armed forces that is respected and accepted as a leader in its region and beyond. This requires a large and modern Air Force. UAVs have become an essential component of air power, allowing countries to project military strength and defend their interests in the region. To determine the priority for the next type of UAV, we present six alternatives: a strategic bomber UAV, an air refueling UAV, a multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities, a UAV in the role of Command and Control functions, an airlift cargo UAV/drone, and a Combat Search & Rescue swarm of UAVs/drones. Then, we use the Best-Worst Method (BWM) with z-number theory to rank the UAV projects and technologies. The z-fuzzy BWM is employed to prioritize UAV alternatives, considering the uncertainty in decision-maker's evaluations and reliability levels. Based on the judgments of experts, the priority value of each strategy is calculated, and the most important UAV alternative is determined as the multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Prioritizing Surgical Cancellation Factors Based on a Fuzzy Best-Worst Method: A Case Study
    Momen, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R.
    Ghasemkhani, A.
    Shahnejat-Bushehri, S.
    Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, H.
    IFAC PAPERSONLINE, 2019, 52 (13): : 112 - 117
  • [22] A Novel Fuzzy Best-Worst Multicriteria Decision-Making Method Based on the Dual Interval Algorithm for Environmental Decision Support Systems
    Cheng, Y.
    Jin, L.
    Fu, H. Y.
    Fan, Y. R.
    Bai, R. L.
    Wei, Y.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATICS, 2024, 44 (02) : 155 - 169
  • [23] A group multi-criteria decision-making based on best-worst method
    Safarzadeh, Soroush
    Khansefid, Saba
    Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza
    COMPUTERS & INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING, 2018, 126 : 111 - 121
  • [24] A linguistic information granulation model based on best-worst method in decision making problems
    Ma, Xiaoyu
    Qin, Jindong
    Martinez, Luis
    Pedrycz, Witold
    INFORMATION FUSION, 2023, 89 : 210 - 227
  • [25] Hesitant fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making method and its applications
    Ali, Asif
    Rashid, Tabasam
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2019, 34 (08) : 1953 - 1967
  • [26] Sustainable performance evaluation: a practical approach based on fuzzy best-worst method and fuzzy inference system
    Azadmanesh A.
    Maleki M.R.
    International Journal of Applied Decision Sciences, 2022, 15 (02) : 201 - 220
  • [27] An assessment of the banking industry performance based on Intuitionistic fuzzy Best-Worst Method and fuzzy inference system
    Seyfi-Shishavan, Seyed Amin
    Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu
    Farrokhizadeh, Elmira
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2021, 113
  • [28] Fuzzy best-worst method based on generalized interval-valued trapezoidal fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making
    Wan, Shuping
    Dong, Jiuying
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 573 : 493 - 518
  • [29] Multicriteria decision-making-based framework for implementing DevOps practices: A fuzzy best-worst approach
    Kumar, Ankur
    Nadeem, Mohammad
    Shameem, Mohammad
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2023, 6
  • [30] A hybrid emergency decision-making technique based on trapezoidal fuzzy best-worst method and zero-sum game
    Chen, Ze-hui
    Wu, Deng-feng
    Luo, Wen
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2023, 234