Decision For The Next Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Considering Regional Operational Requirements Based on Z-Fuzzy Best-Worst Method

被引:0
|
作者
Saylam, Serhat [1 ]
Gundogdu, Fatma Kutlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Natl Def Univ, Turkish Air Force Acad, Dept Ind Engn, Istanbul, Turkiye
关键词
regional air power; unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); decision analysis; Best-Worst method; z-number theory; AIRCRAFT; AHP; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1109/RAST57548.2023.10197893
中图分类号
V [航空、航天];
学科分类号
08 ; 0825 ;
摘要
In this study, we discuss the relationship between being a regional air power and having military unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and we explore the priorities for Turkiye's next type of UAV to be developed. The Turkish Ministry of National Defence aims to have a strong and influential armed forces that is respected and accepted as a leader in its region and beyond. This requires a large and modern Air Force. UAVs have become an essential component of air power, allowing countries to project military strength and defend their interests in the region. To determine the priority for the next type of UAV, we present six alternatives: a strategic bomber UAV, an air refueling UAV, a multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities, a UAV in the role of Command and Control functions, an airlift cargo UAV/drone, and a Combat Search & Rescue swarm of UAVs/drones. Then, we use the Best-Worst Method (BWM) with z-number theory to rank the UAV projects and technologies. The z-fuzzy BWM is employed to prioritize UAV alternatives, considering the uncertainty in decision-maker's evaluations and reliability levels. Based on the judgments of experts, the priority value of each strategy is calculated, and the most important UAV alternative is determined as the multi-role loyal wingman UAV with EW capabilities.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Decision Making with Intuitionistic Fuzzy Best-Worst Method
    Cheng, Xianjuan
    Chen, Changxiong
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2024, 237
  • [2] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Method Based on the Fuzzy Interval Scale
    Goldani, Nastaran
    Kazemi, Mostafa
    ADVANCES IN BEST-WORST METHOD, BWM2022, 2023, : 59 - 73
  • [3] A neutrosophic enhanced best-worst method for considering decision-makers' confidence in the best and worst criteria
    Vafadarnikjoo, Amin
    Tavana, Madjid
    Botelho, Tiago
    Chalvatzis, Konstantinos
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2020, 289 (02) : 391 - 418
  • [4] Approaches for multicriteria decision-making based on the hesitant fuzzy best-worst method
    Li, Jian
    Niu, Li-li
    Chen, Qiongxia
    Wang, Zhong-xing
    COMPLEX & INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS, 2021, 7 (05) : 2617 - 2634
  • [5] Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making
    Dong, Jiuying
    Wan, Shuping
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    Information Sciences, 2021, 547 : 1080 - 1104
  • [6] Fuzzy best-worst method based on triangular fuzzy numbers for multi-criteria decision-making
    Dong, Jiuying
    Wan, Shuping
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2021, 547 : 1080 - 1104
  • [7] A Fuzzy Best-Worst Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making Method
    Guo, Sen
    Qi, Ze
    IEEE ACCESS, 2021, 9 : 118941 - 118952
  • [8] An α-cut intervals based Fuzzy Best-Worst Method for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making
    Ratandhara, Harshit M.
    Kumar, Mohit
    APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING, 2024, 159
  • [9] A novel intuitionistic fuzzy best-worst method for group decision making with intuitionistic fuzzy preference relations
    Wan, Shu-Ping
    Dong, Jiu-Ying
    Chen, Shyi-Ming
    INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2024, 666
  • [10] A novel fuzzy general best-worst method for considering diversity and inclusion in supplier selection programs
    Tavana, Madjid
    Sorooshian, Shahryar
    Sarvarizadehkouhpaye, Meysam
    Mina, Hassan
    ANNALS OF OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2024,