Bayesian phase II adaptive randomization by jointly modeling efficacy and toxicity as time-to-event outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Yu-Mei [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Pao-Sheng [1 ]
Ho, Chun-Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Tunghai Univ, Dept Stat, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Tunghai Univ, Dept Stat, 1727,Sec 4,Taiwan Blvd, Taichung 407224, Taiwan
关键词
Bayesian adaptive randomization; frailty; Phase II trial; random effect; time-to-event outcome; toxicity; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2023.2297782
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The main goals of Phase II trials are to identify the therapeutic efficacy of new treatments and continue monitoring all the possible adverse effects. In Phase II trials, it is important to develop an adaptive randomization (AR) procedure that takes into account both the efficacy and toxicity. In most existing articles, toxicity is modeled as a binary endpoint through an unobservable random effect (frailty) to link the efficacy and toxicity. However, this approach does not capture toxicity profiles that evolve over time. In this article, we propose a new Bayesian adaptive randomization (BAR) procedure using the covariate-adjusted efficacy-toxicity ratio (ETR) index, where efficacy and toxicity are jointly modelled as time-to-event (TTE) outcomes. Furthermore, we also propose early stopping rules for toxicity and futility such that inferior treatments can be dropped at earlier time of trial. Simulation results show that compared to the BAR procedures based solely on the efficacy and that based on TTE efficacy and binary toxicity outcomes, the proposed BAR procedure can better identify the difference in treatment toxicity such that it can assign more patients to the superior treatment arm under some scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 226
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Joint modeling of longitudinal continuous, longitudinal ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes
    Alam, Khurshid
    Maity, Arnab
    Sinha, Sanjoy K.
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Sattar, Abdus
    LIFETIME DATA ANALYSIS, 2021, 27 (01) : 64 - 90
  • [32] Nonparametric randomization-based covariate adjustment for stratified analysis of time-to-event or dichotomous outcomes
    Hussey, Michael A.
    Koch, Gary G.
    Preisser, John S.
    Saville, Benjamin R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 26 (03) : 579 - 589
  • [33] Adaptive Optimal Designs for Dose-Finding Studies with Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Ryeznik, Yevgen
    Sverdlov, Oleksandr
    Hooker, Andrew C.
    AAPS JOURNAL, 2018, 20 (01):
  • [34] Adaptive Optimal Designs for Dose-Finding Studies with Time-to-Event Outcomes
    Yevgen Ryeznik
    Oleksandr Sverdlov
    Andrew C. Hooker
    The AAPS Journal, 20
  • [35] BAYESIAN JOINT MODELING OF LONGITUDINAL MEASUREMENTS AND TIME-TO-EVENT DATA USING ROBUST DISTRIBUTIONS
    Baghfalaki, T.
    Ganjali, M.
    Hashemi, R.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (04) : 834 - 855
  • [36] A semiparametric Bayesian approach to population finding with time-to-event and toxicity data in a randomized clinical trial
    Morita, Satoshi
    Mueller, Peter
    Abe, Hiroyasu
    BIOMETRICS, 2021, 77 (02) : 634 - 648
  • [37] Commentary on 'Designing phase II studies in cancer with time-to-event endpoints'
    Case, Doug
    Morgan, Tim
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (03) : 222 - 223
  • [38] Bayesian design of clinical trials with multiple time-to-event outcomes subject to functional cure
    Cho, Seoyoon
    Psioda, Matthew A.
    Ibrahim, Joseph G.
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2025,
  • [39] TITE-gBOIN-ET: Time-to-event generalized Bayesian optimal interval design to accelerate dose-finding accounting for ordinal graded efficacy and toxicity outcomes
    Takeda, Kentaro
    Yamaguchi, Yusuke
    Taguri, Masataka
    Morita, Satoshi
    BIOMETRICAL JOURNAL, 2023, 65 (07)
  • [40] Bayesian analysis under accelerated failure time models with error-prone time-to-event outcomes
    Yanlin Tang
    Xinyuan Song
    Grace Yun Yi
    Lifetime Data Analysis, 2022, 28 : 139 - 168