Bayesian phase II adaptive randomization by jointly modeling efficacy and toxicity as time-to-event outcomes

被引:0
|
作者
Chang, Yu-Mei [1 ,2 ]
Shen, Pao-Sheng [1 ]
Ho, Chun-Ying [1 ]
机构
[1] Tunghai Univ, Dept Stat, Taichung, Taiwan
[2] Tunghai Univ, Dept Stat, 1727,Sec 4,Taiwan Blvd, Taichung 407224, Taiwan
关键词
Bayesian adaptive randomization; frailty; Phase II trial; random effect; time-to-event outcome; toxicity; CLINICAL-TRIALS; SURVIVAL;
D O I
10.1080/10543406.2023.2297782
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The main goals of Phase II trials are to identify the therapeutic efficacy of new treatments and continue monitoring all the possible adverse effects. In Phase II trials, it is important to develop an adaptive randomization (AR) procedure that takes into account both the efficacy and toxicity. In most existing articles, toxicity is modeled as a binary endpoint through an unobservable random effect (frailty) to link the efficacy and toxicity. However, this approach does not capture toxicity profiles that evolve over time. In this article, we propose a new Bayesian adaptive randomization (BAR) procedure using the covariate-adjusted efficacy-toxicity ratio (ETR) index, where efficacy and toxicity are jointly modelled as time-to-event (TTE) outcomes. Furthermore, we also propose early stopping rules for toxicity and futility such that inferior treatments can be dropped at earlier time of trial. Simulation results show that compared to the BAR procedures based solely on the efficacy and that based on TTE efficacy and binary toxicity outcomes, the proposed BAR procedure can better identify the difference in treatment toxicity such that it can assign more patients to the superior treatment arm under some scenarios.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 226
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Designing phase II studies in cancer with time-to-event endpoints
    Owzar, Kouros
    Jung, Sin-Ho
    CLINICAL TRIALS, 2008, 5 (03) : 209 - 221
  • [22] A phase II trial design based on median time-to-event
    Karrison, T
    Rudin, C
    CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2003, 24 : 225S - 225S
  • [23] A Bayesian semiparametric multivariate joint model for multiple longitudinal outcomes and a time-to-event
    Rizopoulos, Dimitris
    Ghosh, Pulak
    STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2011, 30 (12) : 1366 - 1380
  • [24] A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial
    Bekele, BN
    Shen, Y
    BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) : 344 - 354
  • [25] EFFICIENT AND ETHICAL RESPONSE-ADAPTIVE RANDOMIZATION DESIGNS FOR MULTI-ARM CLINICAL TRIALS WITH WEIBULL TIME-TO-EVENT OUTCOMES
    Sverdlov, Oleksandr
    Ryeznik, Yevgen
    Wong, Weng-Kee
    JOURNAL OF BIOPHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2014, 24 (04) : 732 - 754
  • [26] Validity of Tests for Time-to-Event Endpoints in Studies with the Pocock and Simon Covariate-Adaptive Randomization
    Johnson, Victoria P.
    Gekhtman, Michael
    Kuznetsova, Olga M.
    STATISTICS IN BIOPHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2024, 16 (04): : 468 - 482
  • [27] Phase II trial design with Bayesian adaptive randomization and predictive probability
    Yin, Guosheng
    Chen, Nan
    Lee, J. Jack
    JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2012, 61 : 219 - 235
  • [28] Time-to-Event Bayesian Optimal Interval Design to Accelerate Phase I Trials
    Yuan, Ying
    Lin, Ruitao
    Li, Daniel
    Nie, Lei
    Warren, Katherine E.
    CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (20) : 4921 - 4930
  • [29] Using recurrent time-to-event models with multinomial outcomes to generate toxicity profiles
    Gebski, Val
    Marschner, Ian
    Asher, Rebecca
    Byth, Karen
    PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2021, 20 (04) : 840 - 849
  • [30] Joint modeling of longitudinal continuous, longitudinal ordinal, and time-to-event outcomes
    Khurshid Alam
    Arnab Maity
    Sanjoy K. Sinha
    Dimitris Rizopoulos
    Abdus Sattar
    Lifetime Data Analysis, 2021, 27 : 64 - 90